Jump to content

Muslim Grooming Gang, Feat. 'sikh'


Balkaar
 Share

Recommended Posts

Nothing wrong with being suspicious of Islam.

And the Arabic supremacism it conceals behind it's religious mask.

But yeah, a perv is a perv and anyone who ruins a young girls life should be castrated.

In fact Mulsims pray to Mecca and receive instructions directly from the Arabs and Sikhs pray to Amristar and receive instructions directly from the Punjabi's so I guess

as an Englishman I should mistrust both religions and both peoples equally.

But then Catholics love the Pope and pray to Rome which is not in England but then well, Rome is closer than Mecca or Amristar, it's part of Europe anyway.

So I trust Catholics more than Sikhs or Muslims.

The main thing Sikhi has going for it more than Islam is there is no "kill the Kafir" in Sikhi or "subdugate the Kafir" or at least I hope not.

I haven't found anything like that so far and I am optimistic I don't but then you never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is sad...and it will be ironical cuz we always pointed fingers at the Pakistanis and Muslims.

We need a total direct breakdown of the perpetrators of sexual offences and from which community and ethnicity they came from to form a correct judgement.

Getting figures like these is probably impossible.

However the timing of the two new stories within one day of each, one about the Sikh hero and his Turban saving antics and the other about a Sikh perv shaging young kids seems a bit odd to say the least. Go figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those among you who believe that child grooming can only ever be committed by Muslims -

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3086387/Girl-victim-Asian-abuse-gang-sex-60-men-approached-Woolworths-aged-just-12.html

It would appear the corruption is spreading.

The corruption isn't spreading, it's always been there but we choose to focus on the problem's of other communities instead.

By definition, as human's we are all flawed, what you pray to or who you bow down to has nothing to do with t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But then Catholics love the Pope and pray to Rome which is not in England but then well, Rome is closer than Mecca or Amristar, it's part of Europe anyway.

So I trust Catholics more than Sikhs or Muslims.

Lol, Catholicism is trustworthy because the Roman Church is closer to you? The church which is more concerned with men kissing than with its priests raping the children of their own congregations? The Church which says AIDs is bad but condoms are worse, and condemns millions of diseased Africans to death because of this ridiculous pronouncement? The record of Catholicism is as deplorable as that of Islam. Of all the major religions, it is second only to Sunni Islam in its backwardness.

That has to be the weirdest reason for putting trust in anyone that I have ever heard - proximity. Those nearer to me are more trustworthy simply by virtue of the fact that they are nearer ME. There are undertones of narcissism in such an opinion.

I only consider a single thing when investing my trust in someone - their trustworthiness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The corruption isn't spreading, it's always been there but we choose to focus on the problem's of other communities instead.

By definition, as human's we are all flawed, what you pray to or who you bow down to has nothing to do with t.

Perverts are everywhere, however this particular problem from other communities has affected our community over the past few decades as Bhai Mohan Singh of Sikh Awareness Society would attest to.

Let us be aware of our community's faults,

but let us not get into this reverse moral equivalency where we try to find equivalency between blatant multiple organised grooming that has been around for decades, covered by local authorities and police as well as by the particular community in question with a few cases that may involve Sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use