Jump to content

Why No Harsh Law In Punjab Against People Who Do Beadbi?


Recommended Posts

All this anger for what? What did you accomplish by placing doubt on Amrit? The idea is to arise from the current state of mind into the Guru's wisdom. The Guru has never used Amrit as some magical potion and never will in the form of Punj Pyare. The event of 1699 is no show of magic or a miracle. To a blind man the idea of sight is a miracle. Kala afghana has been proven wrong in this very century. Gurbani/Shabad Guru/ Guru Sahib gave a blind man the ability to see. Can he explain this for us or use science? He can't and neither can science. Those who come with knowing little about Guru Sahib will call it a miracle or won't believe it is possible. Yet it is only a perspective and not reality. The reality is held by those who are able to understand the ability of Guru Sahib and why he expresses this ability from time to time that some call miracles or don't believe. To a man who is mostly driven by tamas, the day he gets out of bed early is a miracle. Same goes for a man beat down by addiction. It is not a matter of, if the Guru can revive a rat with Amrit, but why???? The Bani of Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji criticizes Krishna for showing off the ability to put a nose ring in a king cobra's nose, who no one else could do. Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji Maharaj ask Krishna, what has he accomplished by such act? Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji says, Akal Purakh created all and Akal Purakh is in control of creation. Giving us the indication the ability of doing anything is not to be measured by relativity as Akal Purakh is able to do anything. Kala Afghana has taken his own abilities and what science describes as possible by humans or nature and placed it as the benchmark to measure any other action or act in this world. Anything that has taken place in this world, which does not meet his benchmark is classified as of not taking place or is fictitious. Anyone who is a Sikh as defined by Gurbani will say this is absurd. Hence we have many people calling Kala Afghana a complete mor*n. His reasoning is all wrong and I really don't believe he reads Gurbani. What Kala Afghana and supporters want is for some Gurmukh to demonstrate some higher ability, which a normal human cannot do and science says is impossible. No Gurmukh will do this for anyone because they believe in Akal Purakh's ability to do anything. There small act will not solve anything and will provide nothing that Gurbani has already given us. If your whole religious belief is based on whether someone can perform these acts. Then simply type in Buddhist monk self immolation into youtube and watch a Buddhist monk demonstrate the ability which science says can't happen and is above human ability. The Guru-mat is not here to give the unbeliever magic shows. The Guru-mat is here to quiet the mind by telling us what is and giving the ability to experience Gurbani.

The question is simple. Why do you want Punj Pyare to revive a dead rat? The answer is simple because your ego can't handle what is beyond your ability to understand. How do I bring it in my grasp? Bow at the Gurus feet by saying I know nothing, I am nothing and I am here to learn through Gurbani. The tongue will rewrite the blueprint of the mind through Gurbani.

Where have I shown anger? You seem to be telling me not to question anything and just follow. Do you not see a problem in that? In no way am I comparing myself or this situation to that of Guru Nanaks, but had he not started question and just followed, would we really be having this discussion today? And as for why, usually if people claims that are quite extrordinary, people want to see it and have it proven, to say "I cant do it but I wont show you!" is childish in my opinion. Back up your claims. You say the Guru never used Amrit as a magic potion, so do you believe it doesn't have the ability to revive the dead? FYI, I do not believe science knows it all or can explain it all.

Also, you say Kala Afghana supporters want a Gurmukh to show a higher ability, but they will do no such thing. Yet, I often stubmle upon stories of "Mahapurkhs" performing practically miracles and leaving their followers in awe. So this leaves me a bit confused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

All this anger for what? What did you accomplish by placing doubt on Amrit? The idea is to arise from the current state of mind into the Guru's wisdom. The Guru has never used Amrit as some magical potion and never will in the form of Punj Pyare. The event of 1699 is no show of magic or a miracle. To a blind man the idea of sight is a miracle. Kala afghana has been proven wrong in this very century. Gurbani/Shabad Guru/ Guru Sahib gave a blind man the ability to see. Can he explain this for us or use science? He can't and neither can science. Those who come with knowing little about Guru Sahib will call it a miracle or won't believe it is possible. Yet it is only a perspective and not reality. The reality is held by those who are able to understand the ability of Guru Sahib and why he expresses this ability from time to time that some call miracles or don't believe. To a man who is mostly driven by tamas, the day he gets out of bed early is a miracle. Same goes for a man beat down by addiction. It is not a matter of, if the Guru can revive a rat with Amrit, but why???? The Bani of Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji criticizes Krishna for showing off the ability to put a nose ring in a king cobra's nose, who no one else could do. Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji Maharaj ask Krishna, what has he accomplished by such act? Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji says, Akal Purakh created all and Akal Purakh is in control of creation. Giving us the indication the ability of doing anything is not to be measured by relativity as Akal Purakh is able to do anything. Kala Afghana has taken his own abilities and what science describes as possible by humans or nature and placed it as the benchmark to measure any other action or act in this world. Anything that has taken place in this world, which does not meet his benchmark is classified as of not taking place or is fictitious. Anyone who is a Sikh as defined by Gurbani will say this is absurd. Hence we have many people calling Kala Afghana a complete mor*n. His reasoning is all wrong and I really don't believe he reads Gurbani. What Kala Afghana and supporters want is for some Gurmukh to demonstrate some higher ability, which a normal human cannot do and science says is impossible. No Gurmukh will do this for anyone because they believe in Akal Purakh's ability to do anything. There small act will not solve anything and will provide nothing that Gurbani has already given us. If your whole religious belief is based on whether someone can perform these acts. Then simply type in Buddhist monk self immolation into youtube and watch a Buddhist monk demonstrate the ability which science says can't happen and is above human ability. The Guru-mat is not here to give the unbeliever magic shows. The Guru-mat is here to quiet the mind by telling us what is and giving the ability to experience Gurbani.

The question is simple. Why do you want Punj Pyare to revive a dead rat? The answer is simple because your ego can't handle what is beyond your ability to understand. How do I bring it in my grasp? Bow at the Gurus feet by saying I know nothing, I am nothing and I am here to learn through Gurbani. The tongue will rewrite the blueprint of the mind through Gurbani.

@Akalifauj, reading some of the other stuff he wrote on this forum makes we doubt that he's even Sikh, (from my assumption he could be a closet-Punjabi atheist).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Akalifauj, reading some of the other stuff he wrote on this forum makes we doubt that he's even Sikh, (from my assumption he could be a closet-Punjabi atheist).

Does it matter? In my opinion my questions are still valid, and many would agree with me. Is this what Sikhi has become, ask a few questions and people start throwing accusations and demanding tankhiya practically. :rolleyes2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use