Jump to content

Sikhi Attacked In Schools - Double Standards


Balkaar
 Share

Recommended Posts

I guess you're lucky you even studied Sikhi at school. Went to a grammar school, did RS for GCSE and A Level but never covered Sikhi and the teachers barely knew anything about it.

Fastforward to Theology at university, and neither the students nor lecturers know much about Sikhi. Lecturers have often implied to me that it's of no real significance, just a branch of Hinduism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could enter for GCSE in Sikhi in your own intrest. Thats what II did. The school entered me for the exam but it was up to me study fro the exam in my own time. It would be better if the whole class studied SIkhi together.

The questions were the same but the religion you base the answers on is your choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess you're lucky you even studied Sikhi at school. Went to a grammar school, did RS for GCSE and A Level but never covered Sikhi and the teachers barely knew anything about it.

Fastforward to Theology at university, and neither the students nor lecturers know much about Sikhi. Lecturers have often implied to me that it's of no real significance, just a branch of Hinduism.

I had a mealy-mouthed gentleman from the Hindu faith try to tell me a few years back that Sikhi is "a samphradhya of Hinduism." My reaction was thus:

hans-landa-o.gif

He was trying his luck and he knew it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not unusual to get provocative questions in a religious studies paper. The idea is to either a) present a clearly-incorrect statement and test you on your overall knowledge by having you argue against it, or b) present something controversial and test your ability to argue for your own views on the subject. It's entirely fair that the exam board is asking things like those that you described above. If anything I'd take it as a good thing, clearly the exam writers believe (correctly) that the "Sikhism is a sect of Hinduism" theory is simplistic enough for even a school student to debunk.

Mind you, the wider education system doesn't really know much about Sikhi so unfortunately there might be less variety in terms of what they can ask about. And of course Sikhi is a very inclusive religion, so naturally we don't even agree ourselves on a lot of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea is to either a) present a clearly-incorrect statement and test you on your overall knowledge by having you argue against it, or b) present something controversial and test your ability to argue for your own views on the subject. It's entirely fair that the exam board is asking things like those that you described above. If anything I'd take it as a good thing, clearly the exam writers believe (correctly) that the "Sikhism is a sect of Hinduism" theory is simplistic enough for even a school student to debunk.

That may be the case in some places, but when a religious studies teacher peddles such fatuities as 'Guru Nanak was a practitioner of Bhakti Yoga' (as mine tried to do, having acquired this idea from some misinformed handbook by W. Owen Cole), the idea that Sikhism is some offshoot of Hinduism would naturally appear to be very credible to one of their students.

I wouldn't mind these sorts of questions being asked so much, if only what was being taught about Sikhi was more accurate, or, as you said, broader. It often isn't though. Some school textbooks (bearing in mind that children are practically required to regurgitate everything they read in these books during their exams) explicitly instruct children that the Sikh religion was created by borrowing shards here and chunks there from the older Hindu and Muslim faiths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And of course Sikhi is a very inclusive religion, so naturally we don't even agree ourselves on a lot of things.

I like this.

My own peronal opinion is that this is your strength. The fact you don't have a dogmatic doctrine that you follow like mindless zombies.

I mean I am only just scratching the surface of your religion and culture here and I do feel out of depth but the fact that so much of your religion is open to intellectual debate and heartfelt soul searching can only help develop you as human beings.

Your religion is internal and not external if you know what I mean, you don't look to the without you look to the within.

Truly fascinating.

I have got one question though, if worship is based a lot on sound and voice then where are your female singing artists?

I mean with Christianity we have Gospel choirs and a lot of very successful singers came out of the Church for instance Whitney Housten.

Am I missing something here, where is the link between your all inclusive non sexist singing religion and your very successful female singing artists?

Where are they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this.

My own peronal opinion is that this is your strength. The fact you don't have a dogmatic doctrine that you follow like mindless zombies.

I mean I am only just scratching the surface of your religion and culture here and I do feel out of depth but the fact that so much of your religion is open to intellectual debate and heartfelt soul searching can only help develop you as human beings.

Your religion is internal and not external if you know what I mean, you don't look to the without you look to the within.

Truly fascinating.

I have got one question though, if worship is based a lot on sound and voice then where are your female singing artists?

I mean with Christianity we have Gospel choirs and a lot of very successful singers came out of the Church for instance Whitney Housten.

Am I missing something here, where is the link between your all inclusive non sexist singing religion and your very successful female singing artists?

Where are they?

female singing artists? lol that is something we aren't concerned about producing singing artists to be honest. There are women kirtanis(play the harmonium and sing religious hymns). Whitney Houston might have been a singer but where was she on the stance of spirituality?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use