Jump to content

Hypothetical New Sikh Sect That Accepts Homosexuality


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was wondering, if a group of liberal Sikhs decided to form a new Sikh sect and call it Sikhism reformed and allowed behaviors such as homosexuality etc, how would the wider Sikh community react?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

I was wondering, if a group of liberal Sikhs decided to form a new Sikh sect and call it Sikhism reformed and allowed behaviors such as homosexuality etc, how would the wider Sikh community react?

Lust is one of the 5 evils, it's only formed like all other 5 evils from Haumai, and if some reformed branch allows Kaam to be public and open then they deserve excommunication. Reforming Sikhi is like saying that our Gurus taught nothing about righteousness, next these stupid human beings will be accepting people saying that killing innocent folk is ok. Eventually this branch will cause bloodshed like how Protestants killed Catholics during the reformation.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

That is completely unnecessary. I believe with the utmost conviction that Sikhi is the only major monotheistic religion that can accommodate homosexuals.

We, as Sikhs, keep our kes uncut because we are enjoined to accept our Satguru's design. Does the same not apply to one's sexual orientation? If one is born gay, then the 'Sikh' thing to do, in my opinion, is to accept that too.

And for those who are considering drawing comparisons between two consenting adults of the same sex having a loving relationship, and monsters who molest children, paedophilia and most other forms of sexual deviancy are acquired behaviors. Nobody is born with these proclivities. The instance of paedophilia for example is quite high among people who were sexually abused as children.

It is sad that certain elements have made Sikhi so inhospitable for some people that ideas of fantastical Sikh sects where they can finally be accepted even has to be considered.

We don't keep our Kesh because it's natural, we keep our Kesh because Guru Sahib told us; as such we should try our best as either manmukhs trying to be Gurmukhs or Gurmukhs bettering their GurSikhi to follow Rehat. If that's true why do we cut our nails, Why do we shower, why aren't we nudists? Lust is something everyone who wishes to follow Guru Sahib to the fullest has to control, as such we should ask Guru Sahib to break our Shackles of Paap, in the same way he broke Sajan Thugs Shackles. Nobody is born gay, because nobody is born straight: when you were born was the first thing that came in your mind:"Let's have sex with a man/woman"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Lust does not equal all sexual impulses or attractions. Lust is an excessive fixation on matters of sex and the exhibition of promiscuous behavior. It is bad, and it must be kept under control. However it is impossible and counter-productive to attempt to purge ourselves of all vestiges of sexual attraction. It is necessary for the continuation of the species no less, and for romantic love.

Our own Guru Sahibaan had children. They didn't spring from holes in the ground, Jacfsing, they weren't delivered to Guru Sahib's house by the magic stork. They were created as per the traditional method. And the traditional method necessitates sexual attraction.

Your nails will break off by themselves if you do pretty much anything with your hands. All these record breakers with extremely long nails have to sit there vegetating all day. We shower because we are stewards of our own bodies, they were given to us by God and we've a duty to look after them. I know nobody is born feeling attracted to men or women, you've missed the point entirely. But the genetic information which determines sexuality is still there in the child, only latent, not yet active.

If nobody is born straight, then I must ask Jacfsing, when did you decide that you liked women? Or don't you? Have you conquered all sexual attraction and become asexual, like a mushroom?

Well to answer your last paragraph, people don't start liking the opposite or same-sex when they're born, they are attracted whenever the time is right, including myself. We are all born from our previous paap which is why lust is a part of us, you say Guru Sahib had children, but he had kids because he was not homosexual, (not that Guru Sahib loves men less than women as he is the greatest lover to humanity there ever was). There are Sikhs trying to break their shackles of slavery to Kaam and your encouraging their current masters to keep enslaving more. If anyone has a lust problem they should talk to someone, ask them for assistance and helping them through GurPrassad to be victorious, yet you keep repeating "Be lustful all you want, if you have a natural tendency to rape someone do it, molest, do that to, it's only natural" stop being hypocritical on what's natural and what's not.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another question is would the panj pyare give Amrit to a homosexual? Or would the panj pyare not allow that person?

In my opinion we have no right to ban anybody from taking Amrit if they follow the basics of sikhi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

I am not. Pornography is bad. Rape is bad. Exorbitant Fetishes are bad. Promiscuity is bad. But homosexuality isn't.

I had a feeling somebody would equate rape to being gay. Two people who are married, man or woman, man and man, or woman and woman, who love one another, giving mutual consent to be physically intimate, is not the same as some boozy nutter forcing himself on a screaming woman.

I assume you support marital rape? I don't mean to sound wrong, but why are you being so defensive towards gay people? Would you support others right to be married for lust over love?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use