Hypothetical New Sikh Sect That Accepts Homosexuality

[Akalifauj]

edit

[Balkaar]

Of course it shouldn't be overflowing, but directed at one person, in a monogamous relationship, I fail to see the harm in it.

Both of the above quotes are your writing. And the first contradicts what you said earlier in blue. You even say, I fail to see the harm in it. Now you want to back out of what you initially said by saying you never stated it. Dishonest is not a good character in a man, who claims to be learned. Maybe you forgot what you said earlier today.

A blunder on my own part. I am sorry. Let me clarify then, in summary, that what I wrote above in blue completely expresses my sentiments on this issue. All else I wrote which does not conform to the spirit of this remark, you may disregard entirely.

[InderjitS]

Hasn't this topic been done to death on this forum and on several others previously :blink2:. Sachiaar Sikhs know in their hearts through Guru Sahib and history what the true path is, until this stage is reached this argument along with many other faaltoo ones are never going to be resolved. Lets not quibble over the Rehat as it stands.

[Guest Jacfsing2]

Why people are using ancient non-Sikh groups to defend homosexuality is rather awful. I feel sad that on a Sikh forum Alexander is treated higher than the only true king: Guru Sahib! And the admin is just being politically correct and allowing them to spread their garbage.

[Xerxes]

Why people are using ancient non-Sikh groups to defend homosexuality is rather awful. I feel sad that on a Sikh forum Alexander is treated higher than the only true king: Guru Sahib! And the admin is just being politically correct and allowing them to spread their garbage.

Nobody is using Alexander as an excuse to 'defend homosexuality', that's a gross misrepresentation. The only reason ancient civilisations were brought up was to refute the oft-repeated argument that homosexuality is caused by some kind of modern degeneration. To be clear nobody in this thread has used that argument yet, which is why my original statement was confined to an asterisked footnote.

As for the 'politically-correct' admins allowing people to 'spread their garbage', there's no point in having a discussion forum if you don't actually have a discussion, is there? If you only want one point of view, go and read a blog or something.

[SikhKosh]

We don't have a problem with homosexuals themselves, we have a problem with homosexual relationships.

The backside is for excretion, not sexual encounters. Going against nature is going againt Sikhi.

[Koi]

Just an FYI for all those uber-liberal types:

There is a hukamnana from the Akaal Takht explicitly forbidding this.

[SikhKosh]

Comparing anal sexual acts with using a computer. Seriously?

[Guest Jacfsing2]

Is going on a computer against nature then?? I'm sure we all indulge in stuff that is against nature. The only people who don't go against nature are jangali people.

don't you go on a computer, that's pretty hypocritical.

[Balkaar]

Comparing anal sexual acts with using a computer. Seriously?

Not all gay men do it up the hoo-hah you know. That's a stereotype.