Khalsa Fauj In Present Times

[Guest ShastarBastar]

ok. you know how we're the khalsa fauj. the army of god.

how comes our army is so out-dated?

our training, the weapons we use and our military power. shouldnt we be like the proper army, comandos, SAS, black-ops and be at that standard (if not better?)

why do we still wanna learn gatka as if that would stop a full on battle with a enemy.

I just feel like we've been left behind and if we're an army, we've become a army based in time, the past with no application to warfare today.

whats the sangat thinkinggg

[Guest Jacfsing2]

ok. you know how we're the khalsa fauj. the army of god.

how comes our army is so out-dated?

our training, the weapons we use and our military power. shouldnt we be like the proper army, comandos, SAS, black-ops and be at that standard (if not better?)

why do we still wanna learn gatka as if that would stop a full on battle with a enemy.

I just feel like we've been left behind and if we're an army, we've become a army based in time, the past with no application to warfare today.

whats the sangat thinkinggg

Having an army is really expensive, especially a modern one; and people in our Panth don't want to give that type of money. (The reason Isreal has an army is because other countries give them aid).

[Balkaar]

-

[Guest Sikh]

lol^^ there's a war coming, that's a fact, spiritual people everywhere have been shown it, even my mum has. For Satyug to come into being, this has 2 happen.

[MisterrSingh]

I was thinking something along the lines of this topic, albeit in a much generalised way.

Modern life and, as a result, modern warfare has made it nigh on impossible for an individual to gather a few men, form an army, and challenge and fight the tyranny of those in power.

Those who would once, long ago in history, have garnered enough support to challenge the status-quo are now rendered impotent and helpless. The "machine" is simply too huge to challenge. Instead, we're encouraged to protest and appeal and plead, all the while those whom we appeal to are probably cackling in glee at the uselessness of it all.

Wars are fought with rockets and missiles; long-range weapons that requite strategic and tactical knowledge, yes, but are no more than the press of a button. So, it seems as long as one has the finance to purchase and employ such weapons, that side could feasibly be the "bad guys" but because of the sheer power of their weaponry they can never be defeated. Where's the justice in that? Where's the morality?

Then there's the non-combat "warfare" of the modern age: the media. Anyone who differs from the norm and has designs of challenging the established order, if he's considered a genuine threat, then that particular character is destroyed before he even sets a foot outside his home. Newspapers, news channels, etc., swing into over-drive, pumping out propaganda to turn the people against such individuals. They smear them with accusations - implied or otherwise - and malign them, totally destroying any chance of such an individual being listened to and taken seriously by the people. Such a person is ridiculed, isolated, slandered, all because he or she poses a threat to this artificial order that's been constructed. Usually that's enough to quell any delusions of grandeur anyone may have had about making their mark and challenging the corrupt and the depraved.

Yet people, being the sheep that they are, buy into this nonsense every single time. In effect we, in this modern age, can never ever challenge those at the very top even if they wish our destruction. It's one big cosy stitch-up, and it lays bare how little control we truly have over our lives and our destinies.

[Guest Jagtar Singh]

How about just living in Peace?

Doesn't matter if your Sikh, muslim, Christian, Jew etc etc. We are all people of this earth.

A militant group Satkaar tried to be the violent mob a few years ago. Where did it get them? Nowhere. The so called 'beadbi' they tried to stop by even more 'beadbi' by themselves.

One life.....live it....with respect for others.

[Guest Jacfsing2]

We shouldn't really start an army, but Sikhs should be more protective of others and willing to die as individuals and not at groups wherever they are.

We shouldn't really start an army, but Sikhs should be more protective of others and willing to die as individuals and not at groups wherever they are.

We shouldn't really start an army, but Sikhs should be more protective of others and willing to die as individuals and not at groups wherever they are.

[JagsawSingh]

There's nothing to fight about these days anyways, since there is the helpful sarkar now.

If the "helpfull" sarkar is the one that destroys our holiest of holies, habitualy massacres us, habititualy rapes us, habitiualy tortures us, habititualy hangs us, habititualy bans everything we do, makes us the butt of their national jokes and generaly humiliates us I really dread to think what an 'unfriendly' and 'unhelpful' sarkar actually looks like. :omg:

[Guest Phaos_Phorus]

In the Vietnam war, the most well-funded, technologically advanced army was defeated by a group of guerillas of all ages.

[Guest Sikh]

There IS a war coming, spiritual people have been shown it for years, even my Mum has seen it, we've seen the same things.