Jump to content

Lazer Before Amrit


Guest Buxton
 Share

Recommended Posts

Do what you want, but just remember that our hairs play a purpose. If we end up in hell after we die, we are apparently pulled out of hell from our hairs. So the less hairs you have the more painful, I guess.

I usually do what I want all the time but this subject bugged me is all.

You can put it down to some sort of Old Skool British mentality of making sure the ladies are OK and not being bullied if you like.

A kind of misdirected chivalry.

Anyway from what I hear from the ladies on here I have no reason to be concerned, when I meet a white turbaned wearing lady with a furry lip on the street

I shall simply say "good day madam" nod my head and quietly go about my business undisturbed.

My main underlying moral compass tells me that it is a good thing to see Sikhs in the world, it always has done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do what you want, but just remember that our hairs play a purpose. If we end up in hell after we die, we are apparently pulled out of hell from our hairs. So the less hairs you have the more painful, I guess.

Also, someone could be the most wonderful Sikh in the world, but if they suffer from complete alopecia they're in trouble, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well to be female and have a positive relationship with your own body hair must be a good thing in my book.

I mean the phobia created in the media etc against female hairy legs and the like has got to be unhealthy for young girls.

To be embarassed to point of hysteria when a few facial hairs appear on your face is not condusive to building a good strong and confident female population.

But on the flip side it does give your enemies something easy to attack so any girl who has the bottle to go proper Sikhi has my admiration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ topic, it simply means that you don't love sikhi, instead worry about the outer beauty. If one love sikhi, these things don't bother or such thought don't occur.

try this for a week before taking amrit, cover your head with keski, don't remove any hair, do nitnem and after a week, look at yourself in the mirror. I can assure you that you will find yourself more beautiful than any fake beauty on earth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do what you want, but just remember that our hairs play a purpose. If we end up in hell after we die, we are apparently pulled out of hell from our hairs. So the less hairs you have the more painful, I guess.

Where did you get that from? What if youre naturally bald :/ do you get pulled out from your chest hairs?

The body is left behind here. Burnt/buried/drowned at sea/rotten/eaten by animals. All that goes ahead is the jot. Your soul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard it from a Katha in a Sri Gurdwara yeaaaaaaaaars ago. Whenever I talk about this with my Amritdhari friends, or Amritdhari relatives they agree to this saying that some of the 5ks are used for our next life too. Just like how we are born naked, and we leave naked. Supposedly we would be naked if we end up in Narakh, but we are so scared of what we have done in our life that nobody cares.

And also, hair helps identify who is part of Khalsa, and they can be sent back away from hell when Sri Yamraj Maharaj notices.

Never heard anything like it :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's so odd. Sri Chitragupt Maharaj also knows what you have done in your life, and would very well know you were part of Khalsa and have done bhagti in the religion of Sri Guru Nanak Dev JI. Also, Sri Yamraj Maharaj does not have the order to punish people who are sacha bhagats of Sri Narayan, and so far from what I see on this earth, is that the dharmic religions only really do bhagti like this. Of course, hair is a major nishani of what dharm you are from.

Chitargupt and yamraj are your maharaj? ? eek

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are the Rajas of hell, so it would make sense to refer to them with respect.

&& you never replied to any of my question, I have noticed I don't recieve replies from you, but instead you change the topic lol

Chitargupt is not the raja of hell. I dont understand that logic of yours.

Please point out which are your questions since there is not a single question mark visible lol.

if you ask a question, i will be sure to answer it :) ive yet to change the topic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use