Jump to content

Recommended Posts

But I think that we shouldn't look from a religious point of you, but of who owns the land. It was Palestine pre-1947, and after Israel was given power,it has lost many wars. Neither side is innocent, but they don't have to be. Since when does politics have ethics anyways?

Who told you Palestinians ruled the land prior to 1947? The levant reigion was split into many "provinces" of the Ottoman empire, not one was called "palestina" either lol.

Yeah, no. There is nothing religious about the situation. It is purely political.

We get Arabia? Right so that justifies a complete and utter landgrab, carpet bombing and genocide?

Anyone who supports the illegal and terrorist state of Israel is either.

a. Not human.

b. Ignorant as all get out.

I'm not saying you support Israel, but justifying driving people off of their land in any form is abhorrent, even if saying 'they have'. They are stateless, and unfortunately a lot of the Arab nations are so far up the USA's arse they also favour the Israelis to the Palestinians.

Disgusting.

Why don't muslim folks realize they will never defeat Israel? Come to a compromise, because if Hamas keep on trying to launch rockets at Israel, Hamas will keep on getting bombed in return. If Hamas gets bombed, it is civilians who will inevitably get bombed too considering the urban environment and density of Gaza. Cut your losses short, get Hamas out of there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not true. This conflict wouldn't even be happening if the Abrahamic religions weren't so fixated with the idea of a Holy Land. The Israelis would agree to the division of the Holy Land immediately if their messianic prophecies didn't propel them to colonize all it.

I agree, only a morally deficient individual could support Israel's theft. But I believe the same can be said of anybody who supports the equally sanguinary Palestinian state with its glorification of terrorism and Islamic radicalism - https://news.vice.com/article/palestinian-support-for-hamas-soars-after-israel-war-as-fatah-loses-backing

Screw the Israelis and screw the Palestinians.

Wow, what an awful attitude. I'd say 'Screw no one' inclusive of Sikhs. Then again, maybe that's just from a generally more tolerant stand-point and nothing to do with religion. Just like this fallacious 'holy land' BS you are going on about. The Palestinians care not about others in the holy land, they care about their homeland - the Israelis are not even practicing Jews, they are Zionists. Their care factor is at zero too. For them, it's a guise.

As for the Palestinians 'glorification of terrorism' - ugh, do some reading. The 'right to resist' is fundamental in a landgrab. And you'd do the same.

Why don't muslim folks realize they will never defeat Israel? Come to a compromise, because if Hamas keep on trying to launch rockets at Israel, Hamas will keep on getting bombed in return. If Hamas gets bombed, it is civilians who will inevitably get bombed too considering the urban environment and density of Gaza. Cut your losses short, get Hamas out of there.

A peaceful resolution would be reached in a caring world. We are trying to make the world open their eyes, and care about the eradication of tyranny.

Without resisting, this wouldn't be a war - this would be a genocide. Israel would simply kill every Palestinian there mercilessly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A peaceful resolution would be reached in a caring world. We are trying to make the world open their eyes, and care about the eradication of tyranny.

Without resisting, this wouldn't be a war - this would be a genocide. Israel would simply kill every Palestinian there mercilessly.

I guess thats where it comes to opinion or picking sides, I don't think either Hamas or Israel is the oppressor/aggressor 100% of the time. And launching rockets isn't resisting, nor is Israel trying to commit a genocide, if they really wanted to they'd proably wipe out all of Gaza in a week. If Hamas had the resources to wipe out Israel, they would have done so by now, Israel does have the resources but choose not too. Hamas isn't constantly having gun battles trying to keep Israel out, there is barely a geurilla war, Hamas launches some rockets, Israel enters Gaza, gives a beating and leaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Political leaders on both sides are to blame----but if israel was not attacked in 48 palesine would of bin an indendent state today I don't know much about the subject but may have a biased view and would love to learn more about this conflict----- didn't the jewish immigration start in the 1870's and I know there where indigenous people already there but a lot of jews and other arabs had immigrated to that region when the economy started booming and there was work available where before 1870's it was a very poor region---when Israel was created before the first war wasn't everyone living inside the Israel borders given citizenship even if they where muslim hence why 20% of Israel's population today is arab muslim----if the first war never happened then no one would of bin driven into refugee camps as well Palestine would be a state and they would of had a lot more land cause they had lost a lot of there land during the 48 war and then became occupied after the 6 day war----basically if there was no war to start with in 48 there would be no refugee problem-----but then again I have a lot to learn about this subject and would like to learn more so would it be ok if you could explain your point of view as well as correct what I stated as well isn't 40% of israels population middle eastern jews who have bin in the middle east for over 2000 years and are also considered indigenous people as well in the middle east an didn't they have there land taken away and get kicked out of countries like Syria Iraq at the beginning of the first war with Israel in 48?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isreal v Palestine - Which side would Sri Gobind Singh ji be on if he were here today ?

Simple: Sri Gobind Singh Ji would stand by the Jewish people's right to exist in their own land and even fight for that right; Isreal..... while, at the same time, not only would he remind the Isrealis that they've become like the Nazis that de-humanized them he would take his sword and stand by the Palestinians that are being de-humanized by the Isrealis.

Truth AND Justice is the norm HE set for himself and WE should follow him if we want to wear HIS saroop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use