Jump to content

Migrants Asked To Breed With Europeans.....................


sant123
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hmm, well most middle easterns can pull off looking Indian if they said they were :p Most of the half Indian Half whites look Indian to me, rather than white.

I've got a few in my family and they look fully Indian (which I think secretly annoys some of their coconut parents.....lol). And I like it that way too, so they don't have any airs and graces over being half-white. Some of the mixed race kids are actually more darker than the full Panjabis in the family actually.

I think it boils down to strong genes myself, Panjabi genes seem generally dominant over the white European ones - although you do get exceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha that's funny :p yeah, most half Indians consider them half Indians and not white at all! Even my half white friend who's dad left her family considers herself to be Indian than white (while living with her white mother). They all honestly look like normal Indians to me, whenever I see an half Indian person with their white parent I always get confused thinking it's a joke because I always picture them having typical Indian parents when thinking about my friend's parents lol.

......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

I agree, but can you imagine what this implies? I was trying to edit my post but I couldn't, instead, I pressed the wrong key. I think the one you have quoted is bit confusing. Have a look at edited version above.

I still disagree with the edited version. Vaheguru made each individual different. Anyone trying to have a uniformed humanity of one nature is comparable to Hitler.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still disagree with the edited version. Vaheguru made each individual different. Anyone trying to have a uniformed humanity of one nature is comparable to Hitler.

I asked you to look at the edited version because the one you quoted had not been edited properly, that's all. Whether you agree or disagree, you are free to decide like everyone else including myself. I don't agree with it either. It's horrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What sullay do amongst themselves, in their own lands is no business or concern of mine.

But when whites start jumping into the mix for their own greedy objectives they invite trouble in their own backyards in the form of retaliation. That's when it starts effecting us Sikhs. Whatever you might say, we haven't seen the levels of destruction and mass exodus from Arab land like we are now in living memory. So sullay internal fighting hasn't caused the kind of chaos we are seeing now.

Look at Yazhdis, they have been there for a long, long time - but only after whitey jumps into the mix and plays king maker in the region have they ended up in the state they are in now. Same with Arab Christians, who've been living in the region for eons.

How comes you are such an apologist for whites? Even some clued up goray are saying that the west's foreign policy is destructive and causing more and more problems; what makes you play down their actions and their consequences like you are?

You seem to be justifying neo-imperialism with the argument that as sullay fight amongst themselves it is okay for goray to jump in and start playing their games too. That's a crazy argument.

I'm not trying to just defend whites, I just find it annoying when "enlightened liberals" go around blaming everything on the West/USA. It's much bigger than that, maaany nation are involved geo-political games, many industries/lobbies (that span multiple nations) push for war, its not as simple "the west did it!!"

Sullay infighting (this is sullay infighting too) has caused plenty of chaos in the past, and there have been millions refugees in the past decades in and outside the middle east.As for the minority groups you mentioned that are suffering, Muslims have always picked on each other, since the beginning of their religion. Kurds vs Turks/Iraqis, Sunni vs Shia vs Alawites, its not just now that people started suffering there. This time its just that there is a ton of media attention and more refugees heading to Europe. But do you really think the refugees wouldn't have rushed towards Europe if only rival muslim countries had been responsible for the chaos in Syra? This was going to happen regardless.

I will give you the point that the West getting involved does create a want for revenge.

I'm this persistent in understanding why and how a certain type of 'news' story originates in the Daily Mail.

Bro, forget about the article for a second, fact is still you have this Imam, others, and Saudi multi millionaires who try to export their salafist/wahabbi Islam to other nations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use