Jump to content

Bbc Sunday Morning Live / Guest Jagmeet Singh Anand Karaaj Issue


Porsche911
 Share

Recommended Posts

BBC or any other western media channel is never gonna expose Indian torture of Sikhs in India and Punjab by either the Punjab Govt. or Indian Govt. The Indian Govt. currently ruling is well supported by the British Parliament, British Crown and it is in best interests of British to keep the current Indian regime united under so called corrupt Indian rulers, as they very well know they can bribe those corrupt Indian rulers to take back administration of complete India in one go and re-establish the British monarchy rule in India.

However, if Sikh genocide is exposed, British involvement in Sikh genocide is exposed, right UN investigation is carried out - this might result in establishment of Khalistan - successor to Maharaja Ranjit Singh's Khalsa Sarkaar which was the biggest roadblock for the British before British were able to fully conquer whole of India.

No way, British Parliament, British Monarch or British media will support any Sikh protests or even broadcast any genocide or atrocities of Indian/Punjab Govt. on peaceful demonstrations by peaceful Sikh organisations in Punjab/India.

We need to understand the long-term International politics around all this.

Why Margaret Thatcher sent intelligence to India (Amritsar) to aid Indian Govt. attacking Sri Darbaar Sahib. Where has that inquiry gone? Was BBC reporting during 1984 unbiased - we all know what sort of reporting Mark Tully did.

We need to get our cards correct and start thinking how international politics work and how Jews keep BBC and other such organisations at their finger tips. Do we think BBC/Western World or Christian's/Pope/Church is a friend of Jews? After all, Jews were responsible for persecuting Jesus Christ?

I think rather than any white-brown-black racial aspect over here, it is more what are British interests in terms of economical and political aspects. If these people have a profit of even £10 covering Sikh news or presenting Sikh news in the right perspective, these people will do so; else otherwise. At this minute in time, British media and British politics don't see any political or economic advantage in presenting any atrocities on Sikhs in India.

However they see this as a danger on creation of Khalistan as they don't want Khalsa Sarkaar back.

Exactly, I have been saying this for years but punjabi pendu's wouldnt wake up until it hit home. Basically Queen victoria was so determinied to have a vice like grip over the punjab and what remained of the Sikh empire she had maharajah duleep singh's offspring not produce any successors so that Sikhs would never be able to escape the clutches of the domiination of the european royal family over foreign lands. to this day can we see India as free? Why is it and Pakistan still legalled called the dominion of United Kingdom? Why are anglo-saxon christian invader laws and legal system still used over india and pakistan?

All these questions will point us towards why Sikhs never had a hope of getting Khalistan / Sikhistan in 1947 it was all a pre-planned genocide of Sikhs back then and in 1984 and now it seems like they want to do the same with a new generation they want to kill off if they have an uprising against the status quo corrupt anti-sikh system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's quite pitty shame uk sikhs have hardly any sikh representation in parliament, looks like uk lot seem to me more concerned about nitty gritty issues with their sikh mps instead of long term strategy.

Fast fwd to sikhs representation in canada, we have steady firm sikh representation in all three national parties strategically, this way we don't have to beg our media to bring awareness to sikh issues in india to politicians here , our sikh mps and their closed allies in high position does that.

Fast fwd to current times, whilst uk sikhs seems to be scrambling to get media coverage to get attention of politicians. In canada, our defense minister have already tweeted condemning the incident called india to put its own pressure on - sure one can argue coincidently canadian federal election is tom so its expected but if you take election out of equation on other events, canadian sikhs are much progressive on these things than uk sikhs who have absolutely zero unity on things, they are more concerned about mobing breaking ruining someone wedding day than looking at strategizing and looking at broader picture..time for them to take your heads out from sun does not shine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's quite pitty shame uk sikhs have hardly any sikh representation in parliament, looks like uk lot seem to me more concerned about nitty gritty issues with their sikh mps instead of long term strategy.

Fast fwd to sikhs representation in canada, we have steady firm sikh representation in all three national parties strategically, this way we don't have to beg our media to bring awareness to sikh issues in india to politicians here , our sikh mps and their closed allies in high position does that.

Fast fwd to current times, whilst uk sikhs seems to be scrambling to get media coverage to get attention of politicians. In canada, our defense minister have already tweeted condemning the incident called india to put its own pressure on - sure one can argue coincidently canadian federal election is tom so its expected but if you take election out of equation on other events, canadian sikhs are much progressive on these things than uk sikhs who have absolutely zero unity on things, they are more concerned about mobing breaking ruining someone wedding day than looking at strategizing and looking at broader picture..time for them to take your heads out from sun does not shine.

Has there been anything on CBC, Rogers or any other Canada media outlet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has there been anything on CBC, Rogers or any other Canada media outlet?

That's irrelevant, it really does not matter regarding media outlets as long as politicians are aware of it after all they-politicians/diplomats do the actual work on putting pressure on india condemning their actions..real work is behind the scenes not media story which is pigeon gallery anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's irrelevant, it really does not matter regarding media outlets as long as politicians are aware of it after all they-politicians/diplomats do the actual work on putting pressure on india condemning their actions..real work is behind the scenes not media story which is pigeon gallery anyway.

UK politicians I am sure is aware of the situation too.

Whether it is in their interest to do something or not is another matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use