Jump to content

Why Do Pakistanis Support Khalistan?


mrggg123
 Share

Recommended Posts

Why do Pakistanis support Khalistan?

It'll be easier for them to invade it when it's in our hands. That's the gist of the situation.

Plus, they like egging us on in order to annoy the Indians. Anyone who believes their support originates from a place of fraternal benevolence is mistaken. Pakistan cares for Pakistan.

We fail to see the number of absolutely key, albeit few in number, advantages we have on our side when dealing with India. It's in India's interests to keep us sweet, but they've got us fighting amongst ourselves so that they don't even have to bother with any of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The muslims in Punjab are with us because even they know if we fall now they will die too . The ones in pakistan however want us to get azaadi because we would be a relatively unarmed(of course India would have to give arms and Money to us initially), untrained army force protecting a large region of ex-India which they could overrun with their superior air and land forces.

Exactly, that is why to trust the pakistani muslim snake is worser than to trust the devil you already know (brahmin ruled indian union).

Lets not forget that Sikhs in pakistani dont have any freedom of religion they cant exactly go out and preach and give parchar for muslims to convert, they cant open up new gurdwara's they cant get key jobs within the establishment, they are mocked alot in drama shows, their girls are groomed and kidnapped by muslim zealots hence why most pakistani sikh parents want their kids to marry indian sikhs. Pakistani Sikhs are tolerated by the huge muslim majority they are not seen part and parcel of pakistani society or state because they are non-muslims. In education books muslim kids are taught to hate the kafir non-believers and that hindu's and sikhs are enemies of Islam.

In 1980s behnezir bhutto betrayed the Khalistan movement by giving the details of all the Khalistan armed groups based in pakistan and India that had american CIA / pakistani ISI backing to rajiv gandhi's government, the very government that was responsible for the genocide of Sikhs in New Delhi 1984. She also stopped the flow of arms and funds and stopped giving refuge to Sikhs fleeing Indian state persecution.

So amoung all this backdrop we can see we can never trust the pakistani muslim snake once bitten twice shy should be our motto

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly, that is why to trust the pakistani muslim snake is worser than to trust the devil you already know (brahmin ruled indian union).

Lets not forget that Sikhs in pakistani dont have any freedom of religion they cant exactly go out and preach and give parchar for muslims to convert, they cant open up new gurdwara's they cant get key jobs within the establishment, they are mocked alot in drama shows, their girls are groomed and kidnapped by muslim zealots hence why most pakistani sikh parents want their kids to marry indian sikhs. Pakistani Sikhs are tolerated by the huge muslim majority they are not seen part and parcel of pakistani society or state because they are non-muslims. In education books muslim kids are taught to hate the kafir non-believers and that hindu's and sikhs are enemies of Islam.

In 1980s behnezir bhutto betrayed the Khalistan movement by giving the details of all the Khalistan armed groups based in pakistan and India that had american CIA / pakistani ISI backing. She also stopped the flow of arms and funds and stopped giving refuge to Sikhs fleeing Indian state persecution.

So amoung all this backdrop we can see we can never trust the pakistani muslim snake once bitten twice shy should be our motto

we are sitting in a pit of vipers I see no difference between the kattards of both factions , maybe we have the benefit of the blustering arrogance of the pakistani to thank as they announce their intentions quite clearly before their actions, the more deadly is the Brahmin kattard viper , as they are so charming and smile looking into your eyes while they stab you in the back. But why trust them at all from Gangu until now all they've been doing is trying their damnedest to destroy Sikhi from the roots up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been looking at twitter etc and i see more pakistanis supporting khalistan than apneh. What is the reason for this? Is there an agenda here?

Wouldnt khalistan include lahore and nanakana, im confused about this....

The enemy of my enemy is my friend ;)

I want to see Dhan Nanakana Sahib Ji, my Lords place of pargat, just thinking about it makes me so emotional, just to even be near that place where my Lord was, makes me cry :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use