Jump to content

Guru Nanak Dev Ji's Photo Inappropriately Used In A Conspiracy Video Made By Vigilant Christian


Amaranth
 Share

Recommended Posts

Who cares? I do :)

It's not about the conspiracy garbage but rather the user has inappropriately placed an image of Guru Nanak Dev Ji in the video, where it shouldnt be, which I personally find hurtful and offensive.

Let me break the truth to you, NO ONE cares what hurts or offends you, not in the real world at least. No one is going to jump to ban something because Amaranth on SikhSangat had his/her feelings hurt. Its the real world, not elementary school. Better find a different way to cope with this lol.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me break the truth to you, NO ONE cares what hurts or offends you, not in the real world at least. No one is going to jump to ban something because Amaranth on SikhSangat had his/her feelings hurt. Its the real world, not elementary school. Better find a different way to cope with this lol.

I disagree with this. The more people that report and flag it will create awareness and may have the video removed.

Just because nobody cares doesn't mean one should not try to do something themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree with this. The more people that report and flag it will create awareness and may have the video removed.

Just because nobody cares doesn't mean one should not try to do something themselves.

I fail to see how that will raise awareness? Perhaps someone replying or getting in touch with the author will create more awareness and educate people, no?

But in general, we need to stop with the "hurt sentiment" bull**** it is pathetic, we seem like a bunch of babies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fail to see how that will raise awareness? Perhaps someone replying or getting in touch with the author will create more awareness and educate people, no?

But in general, we need to stop with the "hurt sentiment" bull**** it is pathetic, we seem like a bunch of babies.

Yes Paji, as well as flagging it, that would be a good idea too, to educate the author of the video.

I think good candidates for this task would be Basics of Sikhi making a video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

1. it is NOT a photo or even a picture of Guru Nanak DEv ji ...get a life folks it is a hindu motif picture to take people away from focussing on naam

I agree with the points you mentioned; however, non-Sikhs really don't care if it's real or not, they just care on that picture representing the light of Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji and would try their hardest to offend people with that picture. It's the same with non-Sikhs not caring about Bhad Shed or Larivaar Saroop, (Both forms are 100% Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji and both have the light of Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji) they just want to attack Sikhi. Jarnail Singh Bhinderwale wouldn't care if something was Bhad Shed or Larivaar Saroop he wouldn't let anyone disrespect Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Freedom of Speech > your feelings (Forgive my rudeness)

Too many Sikhs don't understand basic freedom. The Indian mentality of "censor everything" is stuck in their head. Although Youtube is technically a private corporation/service and they can ban whoever they like.

Obviously we should give a response, but we shouldn't just scream "OMG THAT HURTS ME FEELINGS TAKE IT DOWN" or call your buddies and go hunt the guy down and kill him allahu akbar style. What kind of image does it give of the Sikhs?

https://www.instagram.com/p/-5T_YLgCZR/?taken-by=the_greek_savagery

This guy posted a meme of Bhai Dayala Jee. Obviously he didn't know what was going on or who it was in the picture and he used it in a meme making fun his patience and calmness in the boiling cauldron. Eventually, I think he understood and he took it down. The link above is to a post he made right after

I understand some people were really hurt seeing a prominent shaheed being mocked, but the response to the picture was a total embarrassment for Sikhs. Someone even openly threatened to kill him and another challenged him to a fight IN BROOKLYN.

And then theres this whole "Ban Sikh Jokes" thing going on. Are we really telling a government to arrest, fine, and use force against those who make fun of us? Really? What does that show about us?

Sikhs are to be against oppression of rights as ordered by Dasmesh Pita Guru Gobind Singh Maharaj.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use