Jump to content

Golden Temple Put On Worl Heritage Site List


Singh, Mahan
 Share

Recommended Posts

According to news published in the newspaper, The Rozana Pehredar , the Cultural Minister of India has announced in the Parliament that the Sri Harmandar Sahib is now World Heritage site.

Source: http://rozanapehredar.com/news/srii-drbaar-saahib-yuunaiskoo-dii-vishv-viraast-suucii-c-shaaml

Sri Harmandar Sahib has been put on World Heritage Site list. What does it mean? It means that Harmandar Sahib , in the eyes of rest of the world is only a historic site. It means that world community would give its approval to any action that the Government of India thinks is necessary to “(so called )” safe guard the site. In fact, on international level, it gives the approval to put the overall control of and the responsibility of what happens inside Harmandar Sahib complex to Government of India (even though outwardly appears to be under the control of Sikhs through the SGPC which itself is legally responsible to Government of India by virtue of the act of Parliament of India)

Whenever some concerned Sikhs tried to protest this move, both the Government of India and the SGPC denied that such a plan is being contemplated. Denying this by the Central Government of India and SGPC every time the questions were asked was their scheme to keep it secret.

The recent – ( few months ago), the appointments of some highest level management personnel at the site (such as highly paid Secretary and controller/ accountant/auditor) who are NOT under SGPC, but would not only control the finances and management tasks at the complex but also the SGPC finances, seems like the initial attempt to snatch the control of Harmandar Sahib and the Akaal Takht away from Sikhs.

Such a massive fraud could not have been accomplished in such secrecy without the approval of Badals.

This means now that the UNO and rest of the world now recognizes Sri Harmandar Sahib only as a historic site (not a religious site) look after of that- (even the site of Akaal Takht) is officially the responsibility of Government of India (under the Cultural ministry of India).- not the Sikhs. Where are we going with this, only time will tell !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use