Jump to content

Muslim Friend Wants To Become A Sikh But She Has Questions


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

A wiki doesn't need to be owned by a cult for it to be corrupt, the way Wikis in general are made allows anyone to do anything. Even if Sikhiwiki was independent of 3HO, the viewers could still edit it to be pro-3HO. (I don't even have to be Sikh to edit it).

Unfortunately , many fall into the trap of thinking anything written about sikhi must true before even considering the motivations of the writers ... I've seen enough mangled gurbani translations and quotes to be sceptical at least ... it's websites with open edit facility that are most prone to attack by antisikh elements .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advice her to read all of Gurbani. For example if we were to concentrate on "Farid kiss the fists of your detractors...' then we would be making the Sixth and Tenth Gurus out to be an antithesis of what we read. I am working on an article regarding this at the moment, will put it up here soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sehajdharis were Sikhs who were not Amritdharis but attempted to follow the ethos. We attempt to impose modern logic on historic events which did not follow such criterion's. Taking Amrit also meant retaining a conspicuous identity which historically (under both Muslims and Hindus) meant a death sentence. The modern day criticism and vilification of Sehajdhairs is due to Babas who eat greatly, lead the sheep like masses on divergent tracks and occasionally lock lips.

Your definition of a Sehajdhari also incorporates Amritdharis. Amritdharis are also trying to follow the teachings of Sikhi. If you say Amritdharis have accepted to follow the ethos by taking Amrit. A sehajdhari has not and a Sehajdhari can't be called a Sikh because he or she has not accepted Guru Sahib as their Guru. If a Sehajdhari accepts Guru Sahib as his Guru. Then this sehajdhari is a Sikh because he or she is attempting to follow his Guru's ethos. Sehajdhari, may be defined as people on the fence of whether to accept Guru Sahib as their Guru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Often, on Muslim forums, a discussion like this appears, in which members debate how they can get a Sikh girl to turn her back on her family and embrace Islam. I often think, what kind of un-caring monsters are these that have no thought or care about the loved ones of that girl, how they will feel and how much hurt will be caused.

This thread, is a complete mirror image of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Often, on Muslim forums, a discussion like this appears, in which members debate how they can get a Sikh girl to turn her back on her family and embrace Islam. I often think, what kind of un-caring monsters are these that have no thought or care about the loved ones of that girl, how they will feel and how much hurt will be caused.

This thread, is a complete mirror image of that.

Islam has no equality of men and women, Sikhi does have equality. (In fact Sikhi is the only faith to believe in gender equality).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Often, on Muslim forums, a discussion like this appears, in which members debate how they can get a Sikh girl to turn her back on her family and embrace Islam. I often think, what kind of un-caring monsters are these that have no thought or care about the loved ones of that girl, how they will feel and how much hurt will be caused.

This thread, is a complete mirror image of that.

Well surely this thread is different, coz they use lies n deciet to get converts, where as the thread starter here, says their muslim friend wants to become sikh off their own accord, quite a difference!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Often, on Muslim forums, a discussion like this appears, in which members debate how they can get a Sikh girl to turn her back on her family and embrace Islam. I often think, what kind of un-caring monsters are these that have no thought or care about the loved ones of that girl, how they will feel and how much hurt will be caused.

This thread, is a complete mirror image of that.

No, it's completely different.

The reasons Muslims target apneean for conversion are as follows:

1 - To diminish the following of our 'kuffar' Sikh faith, which they see as competing with their own.

2 - To discredit the Sikh religion online by waving these clueless former "Sikh" girls in our faces, and posting their testimonies online to be used as propaganda.

3- To increase their own numbers and move a step closer to their stated objective of a worldwide Islamic hegemony.

4 - To fulfill the deviant sexual appetites they are bound to have acquired as people who idolize and insist on following the example of the paedophile and sex-fiend Muhammad.

This desire expressed in this thread is rooted in Sarbat Da Bhala, and in the certainty that the best thing for the people of the world, including the daughters of Muslims, is to accept Sikhi. We shouldn't feel any guilt about liberating people from violent and backward religions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the Quran at fault which was followed by numerous Muslims in the past who made excellent allies to Guru Sahib or does the fault lie in the interpretation? All faiths face a similar conundrum when it comes to fundamentalist preaching, Sikhi is not immune to it either, albeit we're at the other end of the spectrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the Quran at fault which was followed by numerous Muslims in the past who made excellent allies to Guru Sahib or does the fault lie in the interpretation? All faiths face a similar conundrum when it comes to fundamentalist preaching, Sikhi is not immune to it either, albeit we're at the other end of the spectrum.

Those "muslims" who were allies of sikhs/sikh gurus, were sufis, who were/are/always will be kuffars to sunnis's. Sheikh Farid wasnt allowed inside mosques and denied a muslim burial coz he was a sufi. Those sufi's r so opposite of normal sunnis let alone the h@rami salfist/wahabis of 2day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the Quran at fault which was followed by numerous Muslims in the past who made excellent allies to Guru Sahib or does the fault lie in the interpretation? All faiths face a similar conundrum when it comes to fundamentalist preaching, Sikhi is not immune to it either, albeit we're at the other end of the spectrum.

The fundamentalist interpretation is the only right one Singh Ji. Think about it. Muhammad directed his preaching at the small folk of Arabia, who were mostly illiterate and uneducated. Camel herders, shepherds and slaves. They'd hardly have been capable of discerning some deep allegorical meaning in the things that they were told, and Muhammad would have known this. He would therefore have taken care to express himself as simply and as honestly possible.

Why can't all these stupid moderate Muslims and Islamic apologists, scratching their heads, see that "kill all the infidels wherever you find them" means EXACTLY THAT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use