Sikh Hero Lt Brian Murphy Asked Trump A Question Regarding Safety Of Sikhs In Usa

[WaljinderSingh]

Brainy little soldiers of trump, he won't get 1 million Sikh votes.

I would suggest stop wasting your precious time...

Better luck next time.

[MisterrSingh]

Left wing or Right wing, islamism still wins.

Multiculturalism - islam = Utopia. The right aint going to kick out all browns and slant eyed people come on. All western nations have become multicultural and it works fine just minus the moslims.

That boot you talk about is Sir Donald Trump, whats amazing about this guy is he is self funding.

This is off-topic, so I'll put it in spoilers.

I was looking further ahead than a potential Trump presidency (like 50 to 100 years+), as well as hypothesising about the situation in Europe.

I predict there will be an uprising from the disenfranchised white population, and it'll start on a street-level at first. That's if they haven't been completely brow-beaten by their governments by that stage. The thing is, in my lifetime, whites have been conditioned to become very insular and selfish, with a complete lack of communal responsibility to even their own race.

The only thing that the modern, middle-class or aspirational white person cares about is "his and his own", which is in stark contrast to previous generations where the sense of community and togetherness was strong. (It's something minorities are succumbing to as well. I think it's strongly linked to prosperity and modern consumer / material culture, but I haven't given it much thought).

The grooming of their daughters by Islamics - as these whites stand and watch helpless, or simply without a care to intervene, whilst these issues have occurred right before their faces, on their own streets - is a prime example of this.

When the indigenous population of a Western country is so compliant, even in the face of provocation, governments will gradually chip away at various thresholds to discern how far they can shape society until something snaps in the minds of the public. That time is yet to arrive IMO. When it does, it won't be a surprise because it will have been a long time coming.

[KhoonKaBadlaKhoon]

Brainy little soldiers of trump, he won't get 1 million Sikh votes.

I would suggest stop wasting your precious time...

Better luck next time.

Of course he wont since there isnt even close to 1 million Sikhs in the USA.

[WaljinderSingh]

Of course he wont since there isnt even close to 1 million Sikhs in the USA.

Well done. An applause. Good on you.

[Balkaar]

Britain's Labour Party Vows to Ban Islamophobia

www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5665/uk-islamophobia-ban

^^ Thank the lord the leftist uk party didnt win. This is the way its going down. Slowly leftist parties are going to turn the democracies into sharia compliant. Until there numbers grow

to about 60% one day that will happen if leftists remain in power. Leftist love moslim immigration as they vote leftist parties. Moslims love leftist as they appease islam give them everything

they want.

I dont think you understand the threat of islam? Or maybe you do know. But i dont think you are aware how dangerous islam is so i have posted some videos for you.

That link is from 2015, and it pertains to Ed Miliband's Labour Party. In case you are unaware, Ed Miliband lost the prime-ministerial election and is no longer leader of the Labour Party. It is irrelevant.

On the contrary Singh Ji, I think Islam is the single most dangerous ideology in the world today. But making martyrs of Muslims by banning them from America or persecuting their religion, as Trump intends to do, will only strengthen it. Persecution never has its intended effect, it only emboldens those at whom it is directed. We Sikhs ought to understand this better than anybody, in light of our history. Trump isn't a champion of common sense, he's just trying to curry favour with the American people, most of whom are too stupid (mentally hobbled by corrosive ideologies such as radical Christianity) to realize that his solutions will achieve nothing but the expansion of what they purport to oppose. What do they think the Muslims are going to do when Trump bans them from entering and starts profiling them specifically? They're going to be angry, and we all know what happens whenever Muslims get angry.

Alot of sikhs could do with thinking independently instead of being brain dead sheep. Thinking that Sir Donald Trump is a racist just because he said the T word. This is how far left way of thinking some sikhs has gone. Its like only sikhs should use the T word and nobody else. Any non-sikh using the T word from now on is a racist, a bigot, anti-sikh, sikhiphobe

Same as only blacks should use the N word. If anyone else uses it they are racist and deserve a beating. Trump is a common sense person fed up with the political correctness the leftist party has been corrupting us with. Political correctness needs to be dumped in the trash can.

Have you heard of those students that are scared, frightened, because someone wrote Trump 2016 on the stairs of a University. The students are scared for their life, feel victimized. Aww these poor babies will never recover. I hope there mothers take time off work, the students should be given a month to recover. The mothers must give them milk, keep them away from the nasty internet and television. and give them warm milk and tuck them to bed early at 9pm.

I have said many times Trump has momentum. Everyone is doing their utmost best to malign the great Sir Donald Trump. Sikhs are around 1% if you round it up in north america. Even if 99% sikhs vote against trump it will not matter.

Sir Donald Trump has around 11% moslim vote. This poll is from CAIR, a muslim organisation. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/03/cair-poll-donald-trump-has-more-support-than-all-remaining-gop-candidates-combined/

Dailymail website is a right wing newspaper/website. Alot of the Top comments on Donald Trump articles are actually anti-trump. So your theory doesnt hold any ground.

Balkaar, now my question to you is this. Are those comments i posted right or wrong? Was Sir Donald Trump Insulting the Turban ?

Our brand of British right wing politics is very different from its American counterpart. As is the character of British people, who are generally much more cynical and less gullible than the average American, a cynicism which is reflected in the general hostility with which our politicians are treated by all and sundry. This is probably why he receives a cold reception in the comments section of the mail, that and the fact that mail readers are a miserable pack of sh1ts who survive on negativity.

The scumminess of the reactionary left does not make Trump or the things he says right. No, I don't think he was insulting the turban, but why should that preclude me from seeing him for what he is? - a fool and a danger.

[MisterrSingh]

To add to the above, Muslims are the 'effect.' They are not the 'cause.' Who creates and foments an environment - in the West - that encourages those within their ranks to push boundaries? They haven't just magicked their way into being, have they? It's the Establishment that allows them and anyone else to thrive in such circumstances. The White Establishment that we repeatedly vote for time and time again; the establishment - Left and Right - that's taking the public for fools.

The difference between an admittedly diverse group such as Muslims - however homogeneous - and another minority group that doesn't follow a fundamentally proto-facscist political and religious ideology is that the non-Muslim group's raison d'être does not hinge on a belief system that directs its followers that in order to be a true believer one must propagate that faith in whichever way possible, peacefully or otherwise, dependent on the situational context of the environment in question, I.E. bide your time until a moment arrives where you will be free to enact a direct course of action.

That ^^^ is where the White Western powers are underestimating the followers of Islam. The Establishment believes they (the West) are in control of the various geo-political games being played all over the world involving Islamic interests and parties, but ultimately what they've failed to realise is that the West has unleashed the genie from the bottle (no pun intended), and unfortunately now that it's tasted freedom it will never willingly return to its confines.

Anyway, the Islamic "problem" is a smokescreen designed to disguise the sleight of hand being performed by our so-called leaders. The true crimes being perpetuated are ones involving economics and politics. The flash-bang of terrorism and immigration is just a flashpoint around which to focus people's attention whilst drawing attention away from the things we should be focusing on.

[N30S1NGH]

Trump wouldn't be so much of a problem if he can speak in a responsible way so that his many wacky garden variety of followers don't get carried away and start abusing, restoring to violence to other protesters including attacking sikhs mistaken for muslims or innocent muslims. There is a indirect evidence, when trump made muslims speech, sikh at convenience store and innocent muslims were hatefully targeted by racist. Trump is not directly responsible for this off course but he is definitely creating easy environment for all kind of racist, closet racist, fascist etc etc.

I don't mind right wing conservative policies at times to handle other religious right wing goons, extreme lefty but as long as they can be assertive, firm and responsible and have careful crafted firm policies like policies by david cameron implemented not like fear monger, affected with extreme hysteria, irresponsible, dictatorship quality politician.

So do we need trump to destroy islamic fascist threat? Hell yes, but do rest of world need trump? no way but do make him navy commander to have him deal with islamic terrorist along with putin in middle east.

Akaal purkh creates bigger nuts to deal with rest of nuts before consuming both of them into KAAL. Pure khed of akaal purkh happening here.

[dallysingh101]

I'm glad people are alluding to the BIG point of western leaders actually secretly wanting some level of violent terrorism to take place, so they can try and use it as a tool to keep focus off of their own many kartootan. Given both the economic and cultural uncertainty in the west today, and given the devious nature of politics being played by some, it's actually logical that certain politicians would do that. Especially those who want to keep eyes and focus off the growing discrepancy between the rich and poor.

Thing is, they may arrogantly feel that they can switch this jihadi threat on and off - as required for their agenda, but that is likely to be the fatal miscalculation on their part.

[Quantavius]

Trump wouldn't be so much of a problem if he can speak in a responsible way

Basically you are asking for censorship. If you crave censorship so much, feel free to pack your bags and go live among your own kind in India.

In the US there is something called the Right to Free speech or the First Amendment. The right to free speech means you can pretty much say anything, short of yelling fire in a theater and making bomb jokes in an airport, you have that right. The Constitution protects everyone, Gays, Nazi, KKK, Black Panthers. No matter how offensive ones speech is, you have that right. To quote Voltaire, "I disapprove what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it". This is how Americans built their nation and that is how in a short span of 200 years they achieved something a country like India could never achieve in 10,000 years. Americans of different variety (Mormons, Protestants, Catholics, Irish, Italians....) could live under this rule and prosper but now we have recent immigrants like yourself challenging the status quo. This right here is the problem.

​If you think the problem will just go away if Trump drops out, you are sadly mistaken. No people in any nation around the world will allow their country to be reshaped.

[Quantavius]

Of course he wont since there isnt even close to 1 million Sikhs in the USA.

Looking at Nikki Haley and Bobby Jindal, I don't think the Dems have a lock on Punjabi or Indian votes.