Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Were they German converts? They look like white boys to me.

2,w=559,c=0.bild.jpg

Yes most probably. German, denmark, austria and belgium have a sizable salafi convert community. They had a sharia4germany group sharia4belguim group with the likes of anjem choudary who had islam4uk and islam4india group before they were banned just before the syria war started.

These alleged attackers could also be north african arabs they tend to be quite light skinned compared to other muslims.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I think when such people get caught the best punishment for them that the judge should give is they should be made to do seva at the Gurdwara and they should be made to attend classes on Gurmat and Si

its war time with these half cut goat beardos

I think another aspect of being a warrior is having enough self-respect to value your independence and not becoming some sort of guileless tool for other people's agenda. In a world where plenty of

After the massacre the residents of the village pointed the police to Mohammad Yakub Magray as one of the suspects.[11]

In 2010, the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) associate David Headley(a U.S. citizen who changed his name from Daood Gilani in 2006), who was arrested in connection with the 2008 Mumbai attacks, reportedly confessed to the National Investigation Agency that the LeT carried out the Chittisinghpura massacre.[15] He is said to have identified an LeT militant named Muzzamil as part of the group which carried out the killings apparently to create communal tension just before Clintons visit.[16]

sources:

[11] http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl1707/17070340.htm The massacre at Chattisinghpora

[15] http://www.hindustantimes.com/Lashkar-behind-Sikh-massacre-in-Kashmir-in-2000-says-Headley/Article1-617459.aspx Lashkar behind Sikh massacre in Kashmir in 2000, says Headley

[16]http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20101026/j&k.htm#2 Chittisinghpura Massacre: Obamas proposed visit makes survivors recall tragedy

And we all know how islamic jihadi salafi terrorists operate they first attack when the non-muslim community carries out revenge attacks they cry how the non-muslim community is killing them they ask the mainstream muslims to help them attack the non-muslim community.

WAKE UP!!! yes the indian army is no angel and kills minorities and is a terrorist organisation in my eyes.... we do not have any love for indian army it has a disgusting genocidal past especially for their crimes against Sikhs. However they aren't the only one that carries out these kinda killings. Salafi muslim jihadis are all too happy to attack you and your family because you are not a sunni muslim of their brand of islam.

If you want to live in cloud coco land and live in ignorance thats your choice but the salafi muslim wild dog has you as the lamb in in the green fields in his sights

Ooooooooooh paaaalease!! I KNEW u were gona pull out that SO-CALLED/SUPPOSED "confession" by that militant. 1st of all he supposedly confessed to the indian authorities upon being captured. If u seriously believe this cock/bull story, then u r as dumb as u sound. This is SAME rubbish they have fabricated about prof. Davinderpal singh bhullar, or i suppose u think prof. bhullar is guilty too? Its the same rubbish method they use, by torturing random ppl to the point they fabricate confessions.

Also u very very very lazily put 3 cr@ppy links to sites/stories, and those websites dont even work!

This is an account of a witness:

'One of the captive men who had been lined up recognised someone among the gunmen. He asked, "Chattiya, tu idhar kya kar raha hai?" ("Chattia, What are you doing here?"). The person he spoke to immediately opened fire. At the same time the other captors began firing. As they started firing, the gunmen shouted 'Jai Mata Di' and 'Jai Hind'. In theatrical fashion, one of them took swigs from a bottle of rum even as the killing went on. While leaving, one of the men called out to his associates: "Gopal, chalo hamare saath" ("Gopal, Come with us").'

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As crazy as it sounds, there probably are some 'low iq pendus' out there blaming Trump for this attack.

LOL

We can spin it around too. Maybe that sikh guy protesting at Sir Donald Trumps private event enraged the guy who attacked a sikh in Qubec. I bet that sikh guy got paid good money to protest, what are they paid i think $15 a hour.

The sikhs that protected mosques in southall during the london riots, i wonder who they feel now. I couldnt believe they were doing it. They groom our girls and then these guys protect their mosques

Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^

Wat garbage, EVERYMAN and his dog knows, those sikhs killed in chittisinghpura were killed by indian army personnel. The fact that they did that upon president clintons visit and THEN, they tried to do the EXACT same thing when obama visited india, shows u who is behind this all. The eye witnesses said that they captured indian army topis and quelled anotha organised killing by arming themselves when obama came. All the locals of chattisinghpura n surrounding areas (hindu, sikh n muslims) all say that both incidents were done by indian army (border security forces id imagine).

Sikhs have every right to be suspicious of Indian army after what happened during the 80s/90s. But izlamic militants are far worse in my opinion.

You have izlamic ideology that preaches hate. VS corrupt government officials that hated sikh minorities and others who dont look upon minorities as equal. As well as corrupt Brahman caste system that loves to be in power with great amounts of wealth.

I dont know who did it, there were opinions/witnesses from both sides. We also know moslims lie, like they blame everything on America for the cause of islamic terrorism, to take the heat off their hateful cult called izlam

I wouldnt be surprised if jihadists did it, i wouldnt be surprised if hindu army had a hand in this.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooooooooooh paaaalease!! I KNEW u were gona pull out that SO-CALLED/SUPPOSED "confession" by that militant. 1st of all he supposedly confessed to the indian authorities upon being captured. If u seriously believe this cock/bull story, then u r as dumb as u sound. This is SAME rubbish they have fabricated about prof. Davinderpal singh bhullar, or i suppose u think prof. bhullar is guilty too? Its the same rubbish method they use, by torturing random ppl to the point they fabricate confessions.

Also u very very very lazily put 3 cr@ppy links to sites/stories, and those websites dont even work!

This is an account of a witness:

'One of the captive men who had been lined up recognised someone among the gunmen. He asked, "Chattiya, tu idhar kya kar raha hai?" ("Chattia, What are you doing here?"). The person he spoke to immediately opened fire. At the same time the other captors began firing. As they started firing, the gunmen shouted 'Jai Mata Di' and 'Jai Hind'. In theatrical fashion, one of them took swigs from a bottle of rum even as the killing went on. While leaving, one of the men called out to his associates: "Gopal, chalo hamare saath" ("Gopal, Come with us").'

Im not claiming it was muslims or hindus who did it, but if it was hindu army trying to frame mulims why would they be using hindu names and chanting jai hind? Sort of counter-productive.
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not claiming it was muslims or hindus who did it, but if it was hindu army trying to frame mulims why would they be using hindu names and chanting jai hind? Sort of counter-productive.

True, but at the same time, the post evidence points 2wards a indian govt hand in it. Even bill clinton himself stated that it was done by indian personnel. The indian govt, typically picked up random sullehh frm kashmir, charged, tortured n imprisoned them. Then the dna samples which the govt "obtained" turned out to be complete fabrications, which the j&k chief minister admits to himself. Arundhati roy, an author n big critic of indian state terror/hindutva, writes in her books of how it was carried out by indian state too.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=cFatxEZCOU4C&pg=PA214&lpg=PA214&dq=arundhati+roy+chittisinghpura&source=bl&ots=VAAfm7nXRc&sig=i2XbHLbSgsFFM3jBb6ZzCPBs2k8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwih3f_6xaPMAhWkLMAKHSzlDasQ6AEIYjAQ#v=onepage&q=arundhati%20roy%20chittisinghpura&f=false

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=acwS0vbIVAMC&pg=PA62&lpg=PA62&dq=chittisinghpura+massacre+fake+encounter&source=bl&ots=TjJJXitzW4&sig=_h_K82zlJmD5hpVu3Mk0HbKCH3M&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiQ6Kz6w6PMAhWILsAKHQXICNk4ChDoAQghMAI#v=onepage&q=chittisinghpura%20massacre%20fake%20encounter&f=false

But i suppose its about opinions at the end of the day, just like the air india bombing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I never said anything about life for Sikhs in the UK in the 70s, I was talking about the present day. I understand and respect the struggles that you all went through to get to the position where you are today. But I hope you all don't lose sight of the fact that the freedom and status that Sikhs enjoy in the UK today is very far from the norm. Sikhs in the US today are fighting battles that were settled in the UK decades ago (and without the benefit of a population density that gives Sikhs in the UK at least some visibility and political sway). But forget about the US. You don't have to go that far, you can just cross the English channel and see how precarious the position of Sikhs is in continental Europe. Thanks for giving details about the grooming issue. Do you think this had to do with Labour being more concerned about the Muslim vote (as Muslims former a larger voting block than Sikhs) or political correctness? Or both? I concede that leftists sometimes go to far with political correctness and "canceling" in order to try to show how "fair" and "unbigoted" they are. I am not going to question your take on the whole grooming issue. You know more about that than I do. But that seems to be a very specific situation in the UK. I stand by my general point that left-leaning people are by far the most likely to support the rights of vulnerable minorities (which is the category that Sikhs fall under almost everywhere).   I don't buy your point about a backlash to "wokeness" at all. I don't think that that is what is causing the growing popularity of far-right movements. The way information is shared and distorted today is radically different from what was the norm not very long ago, and that has been the game-changer that has led to today's division and polarization. You seem to think that if the "woke" people would just be quiet, the racists would not have a "rallying cry". That is simply not true. First of all, those people will ALWAYS find something to complain about. (That has certainly been true throughout American history. If it has been less true in UK history, that is probably because the white British majority did not feel threatened by a sizable minority until relatively recently. See my second point.) Second of all, the complaints of the more hardcore right-wing racists increasingly resonate with the more "passive" racists as the majority community diminishes in size and feels more threatened. And third of all, as I alluded to before, today's media/information landscape will allow for any complaints to blow up and go viral.   Any time anyone from the non-majority community asks for anything, no matter how reasonable, there is going to be a backlash from the majority community. And in many instances, the non-majority community doesn't even have ask for anything or complain about anything to provoke a backlash. Their mere existence is enough. This is what history has shown us.
    • Guest free
    • And people want to talk about poverty, look at how India was stripped of wealth. Here 2800 silver bars were taken for ww2 but didn't make it back here. Now that they've found it, look at what they are doing with it. The pillaging is still going on.      Treasure from the deep: Thousands of silver bars that were meant to fund Britain's WWII effort but were sunk by German U-boat FINALLY reach their destination - and will be sold as coins Merchant ship carrying silver from India for the war effort was sunk in 1941 Its cargo of 2,800 bars of silver has sat on the bed of the Atlantic ever since Record-breaking bid to salvage the silver from three miles down a success The Royal Mint is now making the metal into coins to remember the tragedy https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2596785/Thousands-silver-bars-sunken-WWII-ship-sold-coins.html
    • I was reading something on the internet and came across this article and thought it may be of some interest to everyone here regarding their perspective on the impact of brutalities of colonisation upon India and its people.  Here is the link:-   https://www.myindiamyglory.com/2019/03/10/atrocities-on-indian-women-and-india-by-british-during-their-rule/     Atrocities on Indian Women and India by British During ... - myIndiamyGlory 10 Mar 2019 — Raped Indian women were forcefully made prostitutes by British Christians. Prostitution houses were set up by the Britishers in 350   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use