Who Is Responsible For The Hate Towards Dasam Granth?

[WaljinderSingh]

Darahan rogi qualification is matriculation (10th grade) and a diploma in Music from Missionary college.

[GPS]

Darahan rogi qualification is matriculation (10th grade) and a diploma in Music from Missionary college.

In my view he has no diploma as he never went to college and missionary colleges did not exist that time. He learned kirtan from nanksar.

To know little bit about him he was employed as a compounder with a doctor at jargraon after matric.There he was stealing money,got caught and dismissed.

[Quantavius]

My brother first of all he is not professor as he is 10 grade only. It takes 17 years after ph d to become professor if one's thesis is accepted. He has put a label of lies on his forehead of professorship. He is neither a historian nor an academic.He can do kirtan on harmonium by reading from a hand written slip in front of him.A person who lies is unfit to preach as his Jeevan is low.

All his life he earned money by singing banis of Dasam granth. Now when time has changed he is making money to propagate against same Granth.

Perhaps however, he was a former Jathedar so I very much doubt his knowledge on Sikhism is questionable.

[WaljinderSingh]

So were shaheed Baba Gurbachan Singh Manochal and shaheed Jathedar Gurdev Singh Kaunke. Both were jathedaars of Akaal takhat. Both were students and preachers of DDT ( have immense knowledge of Dasam and SGGS bani and Sikh history). Kaunke got shaheed while he was Jathedaar of Akaal takhat.

DDT - Damdami Taksal.

Quantavius you should stop arguing now.

[jkvlondon]

I read that and I'm not convinced our Guruji Maharaj wrote that.

From what I've read elsewhere one of the vocal Anti Dasam crowd is Professor Darshan Singh who is a former Jathedar of Akal Takth. I very much doubt he of all people are ignorant on Sikhism.

he has been excommunicated so forget the past he is NO LONGER A SIKH, his bought opinion has no sway

[WaljinderSingh]

he has been excommunicated so forget the past he is NO LONGER A SIKH

Excommunicated by 'Akaal Takhat' to be precise...

[Quantavius]

he has been excommunicated so forget the past he is NO LONGER A SIKH, his bought opinion has no sway

From Sikhwiki

Recently, he was excommunicated from panth for not reciprocating his tankha. In addition, he and all other's who were "excommunicated" from the panth were called back to be given pardon, he denied, saying that going would give the jathedar's the pleasure of assuming that he agrees with their excommunication; namely, him not attending Akal Takhat to reciprocate his tankha. He said that there was evidence of him going there and this was merely a way to dis-character him.

http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Professor_Darshan_Singh_Khalsa

[jkvlondon]

From Sikhwiki

Recently, he was excommunicated from panth for not reciprocating his tankha. In addition, he and all other's who were "excommunicated" from the panth were called back to be given pardon, he denied, saying that going would give the jathedar's the pleasure of assuming that he agrees with their excommunication; namely, him not attending Akal Takhat to reciprocate his tankha. He said that there was evidence of him going there and this was merely a way to dis-character him.

http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Professor_Darshan_Singh_Khalsa

In my eyes he excommunicated himself by going against the SRM as well as becoming bemukh by throwing dubida on Guru ji's character and bachan, just because this was formalised by the Akal Takht means just a confirmation.

He has no respect for Guru Ji it is clear and neither the institutions of sikhi so why the hell does he think the Sikh world owes him anything?

[GPS]

I read that and I'm not convinced our Guruji Maharaj wrote that.

From what I've read elsewhere one of the vocal Anti Dasam crowd is Professor Darshan Singh who is a former Jathedar of Akal Takth. I very much doubt he of all people are ignorant on Sikhism.

I did not read your first line. You made a statement earlier on this topic that you do not know much about DG.

After 5 to 6 days you are writing that you have read it. What is going on.I am sorry to state that you are a habitual liar.

[Quantavius]

I did not read your first line. You made a statement earlier on this topic that you do not know much about DG.

After 5 to 6 days you are writing that you have read it. What is going on.I am sorry to state that you are a habitual liar.

Look, you're obviously looking for an argument and I really don't have time for that. Yes, yes....I'm some secret RSS guy. Wait! Actually I'm a Missionary! Or maybe a combo of both? I don't know man.

You better get used to the idea that not everybody is going to agree with you. And you can't convince others by fighting with them. It's not going to work.