Jump to content

Budha Dal Is Punjva Takht, Chalda Vaheer


Recommended Posts

there has to be a moving takht.

If we believe in 5 stationary takhts, there will be problem. We will need to open new takhts in Europe, America,Canada,Australia,kenya etc etc.

That doesn't make any sense. Takht by its very definition cannot be human being. Why do we need Takhts in western countries or anywhere else when we already have 5 takhts that have parvaangi of the Sikh Panth? If we take your theory of Nihangs to be a Takht to be true, surely it would find mention in at least one puratan source. But we find no mention of this in Panth prakash, suraj prakash or even the works of Giani Gian Singh who wrote his works in the modern era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bro , I may be naive but the Taksal is based on the dharti of Talwandi Sabo i.e. DamDama Sahib ji thus I held no diff in my mind , sure the institution is not the takht in the same sense that Chalda Vaheer has no anchor point but more like Akal Takht or the other takhts tied a location.

What lol? Mehta Chowk is no where near Bhatinda area. Damdami Taksal is in Majha reigon. Damdama Sahib is in Malwa. You can just admit if you made a mistake confusing the two to be one.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What lol? Mehta Chowk is no where near Bhatinda area. Damdami Taksal is in Majha reigon. Damdama Sahib is in Malwa. You can just admit if you made a mistake confusing the two to be one.

damdama sahib is the location historically where Guru Pita ji started the Taksal in 1705 is it not , mehta chowk started a lot later with Baba Sunder Singh ji in the last century

Link to comment
Share on other sites

damdama sahib is the location historically where Guru Pita ji started the Taksal in 1705 is it not , mehta chowk started a lot later with Baba Sunder Singh ji in the last century

Perhaps, may be. I am not sure, is that a fact with sources? Ether way, damdama sahib has been accepted by the overall Sikh panth as a Takht. Nihangs of any dal do NOT deserve status of Takht, they are useless to the Sikh kaum today.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps, may be. I am not sure, is that a fact with sources? Ether way, damdama sahib has been accepted by the overall Sikh panth as a Takht. Nihangs of any dal do NOT deserve status of Takht, they are useless to the Sikh kaum today.

Dear Brother,

U are making a big mistake by calling Nihang Singhs useless. They are like GOLD. They need some minor improvements.Thats it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sikh Panth has come to accept Sri Damdama Sahib as the Panjwa Takht. And no one including Nihangs are bigger than the Sikh Panth. Before there were only 4 Takhts. Later on sometime during the modern era or 20th century the Nihangs began to self proclaim themselves as a "takht", no puratan source says Nihangs are a Takht. Now the Sarbat Khalsa which the Nihangs also attended has chosen Bhai Baljit Singh Daduwal as the Jathadar of Takht Shri Damdama Sahib aka Panjwa Takht.

Dear Veer,

U are a wonderful Sikh Brother of mine, but sometimes I get the feeling that you are a bit pro-damdami taksal and u dont have much faith in Dal Panth.

Do we have the right to create a new takht?According to me answer is no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That doesn't make any sense. Takht by its very definition cannot be human being. Why do we need Takhts in western countries or anywhere else when we already have 5 takhts that have parvaangi of the Sikh Panth? If we take your theory of Nihangs to be a Takht to be true, surely it would find mention in at least one puratan source. But we find no mention of this in Panth prakash, suraj prakash or even the works of Giani Gian Singh who wrote his works in the modern era.

Dear Veer,

According to you, Sikh Panth has the right to create a new takht ie Damdama sahib.

So if we can create one new takht, we can also create new takhts in england, america etc.

According to me, we dont have right to create a new takht. Damdama Sahib is not a takht and Budha Dal is the moving takht.

Dhan Dhan Dal Panth!

Dhan Dhan Akali Baba Mitt Singh Ji

Dhan Dhan Akali Baba Tara Singh Ji

Dhan Dhan Akali Baba Surjit Singh Ji

Dhan Dhan Akali Baba Joginder Singh Ji

Dhan Dhan Akali Baba Prem Singh Ji

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Brother,

U are making a big mistake by calling Nihang Singhs useless. They are like GOLD. They need some minor improvements.Thats it

Minor improvements? Far from it. There are Im sure plenty of great individual nihangs, but as a whole theyve been useless to Sikhs for past few centuries. When is the last time they really behaved like the Fauj they claim to be?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sikh Panth has come to accept Sri Damdama Sahib as the Panjwa Takht. And no one including Nihangs are bigger than the Sikh Panth. Before there were only 4 Takhts. Later on sometime during the modern era or 20th century the Nihangs began to self proclaim themselves as a "takht", no puratan source says Nihangs are a Takht. Now the Sarbat Khalsa which the Nihangs also attended has chosen Bhai Baljit Singh Daduwal as the Jathadar of Takht Shri Damdama Sahib aka Panjwa Takht.

Actually purataan sources do state so, the primary sources of Hazoor Sahib state so. Damdama Sahib was only recognized as Takhat in 1966, the S.G.P.C's own report on the matter alludes to the Budha-Dal being the 5th Takhat; if we accept your argument (4 takhats versus 5) then even today Damdama Sahib can be removed as Takhat, why honor it so?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use