Jump to content

Sikh Youth Stabs Woman With Kirpan


singh598
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Jacfsing2
32 minutes ago, Berserk said:

Get real, please. It is very possible for someone dressed as a Sikh to commit evil actions. Even if they recite naam, it is still very possible as it takes a long time for naam to correct their mind. What makes a Khalsa is their inward and outward qualities, not just how they look on the outside. Don't be so foolish. 

Even if Hitler did Simran it would effect even him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Of course this judge is racist, you can never rightfully accuse a Khalsa because Khalsa is pure. This judge probably hates Hispanics and Black people as well.

Are you saying, a person who is an Amritdhari can't commit a wrong action?  How do you know this guy was a khalsa in the pure since and not just in name like the 3HO?  

I wouldn't condemn or support this guy because what actually happened is not told in the news.  To call the judge a racist is a stretch of reality.  Also those brandishing their high heels need to take a chill pill.  We don't know what the woman did.  Don't be so simple minded and fall at your knees to yell help for women, who you know nothing about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know plenty of so called amritdhari's who dont deserve a kirpan they are mentally unstable and have alot of rage in them. Most of them have been in prison or been badboys during their college and uni days then stopped shaving their facial hair and became singhs. So just because a singh has a kirpan and taken up the khalsa roop it doesnt make them a pure and nice person. Every person is an individual with different circumstances, experiences and stresses in life you never know when that one thing will make them snap against an aggressor and they lash out using whatever they have available to hand.

As for those who say this singh in this article shouldnt have used a kirpan. I would ask them what is the purpose of the kirpan? And why did guru ji give Khalsa Sikhs the right to bear arms and carry it? It was obviously to use it when you are attacked or to defend against an attacker. And from what I read in this case, the guys mother was being attacked. If your any of your mothers were attacked I would like to think most of you Sikhs would not hesitate to use whatever you had at hand to defend your family, preferably not use the blunt kirpan but if that was the only tool available at hand to protect yourself and your loved ones and innocents then so be it. Most of the time Singhs wearing kirpans run away from situations where innocents are mugged or attacked because they been feminised they been cucked in a feminist liberal society. We need to ensure our Sikh males of the future are strong street fighters and not cuck's who run and hide behind a woman's skirt at first sign of trouble.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
7 hours ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

trying too hard to be "loyal." 

What's wrong with supporting other Sikhs? We shouldn't expect the media to be honest with us. 2 of the Hukams say this about other Sikhs: (the bottom one clearly shows the need for trust).

1. 46. Dikhaavae da Sikh nahee banana - Do not act a Sikh outwardly only for show. 

2. 49. Sikh da itbaar karnaa - Have confidence in a Sikh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2016 at 11:42 AM, singh598 said:

This guy has done biggest bezti of Sikh religion and brought the sacred Kakkars into disrepute.

it is never justified for a man to attack a woman with physical violence 

jacfsingh comments r shocking 

when it becomes common knowledge that Sikhs are fighting in Gurdwaras and using Kirpaan for personal disputes and not self defence then politicians will act to ban the Kirpaan 

Preachers are to blame for giving naive kids Amrit Sanchaar 

Uk Sikh groups have done or achieved NIL besides from nice photos with MPS and pardaans

Singh - I am not going to justify his action but we havent been told the full story on this. But take into account what may have forced him to use his kirpan? What would drive someone to do that? I've been reading through all comments here and everyone seems to be tearing this singh apart for using a kirpan. Let me give you all a reality check, a kirpan is a shaster not an "article of faith".

 

I will give you a sceniro, what would you do if someone broke into your house with the intention of hurting your family? I dont know about anyone of you but that khanda on the side of bed is coming out with the intention of destruction lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use