Jump to content

70+ Dead In French Terror Attack


Recommended Posts

They know that they will overtake the native population sooner than in the west as it well known that Japan has a major population drop off ... there are more oldies than youngsters .

Very difficult to quantify that they will take over Japan.

Japan has been very reluctant to accept immigrants even when their population is tailing off.

Japan is looking towards robots instead of cheap labour.

Japan has not been the same nation since WW2, however with China's increasing aggression with their neighbours, Japan will find a way back to their Samurai ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very difficult to quantify that they will take over Japan.

Japan has been very reluctant to accept immigrants even when their population is tailing off.

Japan is looking towards robots instead of cheap labour.

Japan has not been the same nation since WW2, however with China's increasing aggression with their neighbours, Japan will find a way back to their Samurai ways.

going back to samurai ways ? they killed off samurai themselves by betraying them ...on the orders of the emperor who wanted to be seen as 'modern' sounds much like our kaum betraying the khalsa tradition to become 'modern'. Many of the masters of the old ways are dying out and modern Japanese men are too effeminate through influence of anime/manga many even eschewing normal relationships with the opposite sex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

going back to samurai ways ? they killed off samurai themselves by betraying them ...on the orders of the emperor who wanted to be seen as 'modern' sounds much like our kaum betraying the khalsa tradition to become 'modern'. Many of the masters of the old ways are dying out and modern Japanese men are too effeminate through influence of anime/manga many even eschewing normal relationships with the opposite sex.

Sparrows have to be turned into Hawks again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

going back to samurai ways ? they killed off samurai themselves by betraying them ...on the orders of the emperor who wanted to be seen as 'modern' sounds much like our kaum betraying the khalsa tradition to become 'modern'. Many of the masters of the old ways are dying out and modern Japanese men are too effeminate through influence of anime/manga many even eschewing normal relationships with the opposite sex.

That's exactly the reason the Japanese are under threat from any outside group that bears overt masculine qualities, and funnily enough it's those attributes that attracts the female.

It's a similar issue in the West, particularly in places like Britain, where masculinity is frowned upon, and generations of young men are being raised to have feminine behavioural and personality traits. I suspect it's easier to strike fear into a weak, feminised male population than it would be if they were strong, fighter-types with very little fear of authority. Who benefits from this insidious weakening of the male population? Well, I know who'll take advantage of it, and that's the hordes of Middle-Eastern, battle-hardened (in some cases) men of fighting age being imported into Europe whose existence is underpinned by a religious and political ideology that implores conquest of the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/18/2016 at 11:09 AM, MisterrSingh said:

That's exactly the reason the Japanese are under threat from any outside group that bears overt masculine qualities, and funnily enough it's those attributes that attracts the female.

It's a similar issue in the West, particularly in places like Britain, where masculinity is frowned upon, and generations of young men are being raised to have feminine behavioural and personality traits. I suspect it's easier to strike fear into a weak, feminised male population than it would be if they were strong, fighter-types with very little fear of authority. Who benefits from this insidious weakening of the male population? Well, I know who'll take advantage of it, and that's the hordes of Middle-Eastern, battle-hardened (in some cases) men of fighting age being imported into Europe whose existence is underpinned by a religious and political ideology that implores conquest of the other.

funny thing is I noticed during the seventies it was good to be manly , then during the eighties and nineties the pop scene and advertising started to move away from the manly male towards a boy model , cleanshaven, trimmed eyebrows, perfumed and preened , almost homoerotic model of manhood .Guess it was all part of neoliberal model to produce a non-combative population. Now we have scenes where Morlok like foreign males are arriving and ruling the roost through intimidation and violence . The only possible combatants are the working class macho bigots or kaley, a handful of sikhs maybe .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

funny thing is I noticed during the seventies it was good to be manly , then during the eighties and nineties the pop scene and advertising started to move away from the manly male towards a boy model , cleanshaven, trimmed eyebrows, perfumed and preened , almost homoerotic model of manhood .Guess it was all part of neoliberal model to produce a non-combative population. Now we have scenes where Morlok like foreign males are arriving and ruling the roost through intimidation and violence . The only possible combatants are the working class macho bigots or kaley, a handful of sikhs maybe .

My personal belief is that the biggest deception played on westerners in a post-modern society (in terms of after WW2) is the aforementioned weakening and, in most cases, destruction of the masculine mentality. I'm not referring to the drunken, boorish fools who'd beat their wives and kids after work, but a general and concerted effort to undermine strong male ideals. The reason? Who'll hold our so-called betters to account for their misdemeanours when the very people who would've risen up in protest in previous times have now been emasculated and cowed into submission? Along with the various "encouragements" given to females to spurn the family unit, the promotion of promiscuity, and delaying motherhood it all leads to the complete subversion and eventual dismantling of the values that are the cornerstones of a successful and strong society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use