70+ Dead In French Terror Attack

[genie]

Which of the European nations do you think will fall first? My money's on France, Sweden, and perhaps Germany. It'll take generations, but it's inevitable. Of course, there are 14 million of them in Russia, but those old-school Ruskies aren't cucked to hell.

Your assessment is correct. Germany with its low birth rate of native white german population is also at high risk of being islamised especially by the extremist salafi sect and then rise of far right gaining strength to counter that threat.

France is most likely to kick off first as the white french native population are begining to think very carefully about their liberal credentials and having such a huge muslim population in their nation. Russia is in danger too as their native Christian population has a low birth rate and they have a huge muslim migrant population.

All nations should basically have a covert policy banning muslims to migrate into their lands.... non-muslims should be given preference. And any muslims living in your lands should have no special treatments they should be forced to adopt the host nations customs and traditions. No conversions of non-muslims should be allowed only then a war can be prevented. But these easy and small steps wont be implement therefore war will come

[Ranjeet01]

Your assessment is correct. Germany with its low birth rate of native white german population is also at high risk of being islamised especially by the extremist salafi sect and then rise of far right gaining strength to counter that threat.

France is most likely to kick off first as the white french native population are begining to think very carefully about their liberal credentials and having such a huge muslim population in their nation. Russia is in danger too as their native Christian population has a low birth rate and they have a huge muslim migrant population.

All nations should basically have a covert policy banning muslims to migrate into their lands.... non-muslims should be given preference. And any muslims living in your lands should have no special treatments they should be forced to adopt the host nations customs and traditions. No conversions of non-muslims should be allowed only then a war can be prevented. But these easy and small steps wont be implement therefore war will come

The Welfare State is a big part of the problem also in Europe.

It encourages Muslims to have more children, their birth rate needs to decrease significantly.

Muslims play the demographic game.

However, this will backfire on them because if the Islamic population becomes a majority, the non Muslim that did all the work to create the systems of wealth disappears and they will be left with the Islamic hell-holes they left in the first place.

It is parasitic behaviour.

[Ranjeet01]

This is what happens when Muslims in western countries reach the magic 10% population mark (or 9.6% for the pedants out there).

For the sake of balance, here's an article on France's unique problem with its imported ex-colonial population and their descendants:

http://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la-fg-france-threat-history-20160716-snap-story.html

Of course, only warped, demented, cowardly apologists would attempt to justify the mass murder of innocents on social conditions that are the same for non-Muslims in similar situations. "My life is a hell-hole, so I'm going to make others pay for my misfortunes." What else to expect from an ideology punctured with more holes than Swiss cheese?

We see this same behaviour with the UK muslim population on British Whites in various towns and cities.

This is the kind of behaviour that leads to the far right groups emerging.

What is more dangerous than Islamicization is the cohesive organisational ability of the native Whites.

If "white guilt" gets removed, these ghettos/no go areas will be snuffed out quite ruthlessly.

And if there is one thing a muslim understands instinctively is a stronger,more ruthless force. That is the only thing they respect.

[MisterrSingh]

We see this same behaviour with the UK muslim population on British Whites in various towns and cities.

This is the kind of behaviour that leads to the far right groups emerging.

What is more dangerous than Islamicization is the cohesive organisational ability of the native Whites.

If "white guilt" gets removed, these ghettos/no go areas will be snuffed out quite ruthlessly.

And if there is one thing a muslim understands instinctively is a stronger,more ruthless force. That is the only thing they respect.

And if anyone believes Sikhs living in these areas won't be on the receiving end of these marauding mobs of Islamic hate, then we're living in cloud cuckoo land.

Your assessment is correct. Germany with its low birth rate of native white german population is also at high risk of being islamised especially by the extremist salafi sect and then rise of far right gaining strength to counter that threat.

France is most likely to kick off first as the white french native population are begining to think very carefully about their liberal credentials and having such a huge muslim population in their nation. Russia is in danger too as their native Christian population has a low birth rate and they have a huge muslim migrant population.

All nations should basically have a covert policy banning muslims to migrate into their lands.... non-muslims should be given preference. And any muslims living in your lands should have no special treatments they should be forced to adopt the host nations customs and traditions. No conversions of non-muslims should be allowed only then a war can be prevented. But these easy and small steps wont be implement therefore war will come

Looking at the issue in the long-term, there's 3 ways I see this playing out in Europe. Btw, the United States is an unknown quantity or sorts; their 2nd Amendment could allow the situation to develop in one of two ways: A non-Muslim uprising against the corrupt establishment headed by, unfortunately, anti-minority militants heralding from the South, OR a ruthless government crackdown on such elements in order to send out a message to others with similar designs on taking on the state. Anyway, back to Europe.

1. Things are allowed to develop as they are at the moment, i.e. Muslim demographics continue to explode through birth-rates and the import of Muslim populations from the Middle East and Africa are allowed unperturbed into European countries. Eventually they'll out-breed non-Muslims, and of course, they will begin push for legislation that protects them and affords them privileges based on their religious and cultural requirements. If they manage to get enough of their own into every single political and social institution this will be a much easier process for them. Eventually, they WILL be the majority. However, if there is some resistance to Islamic infiltration into the machinery of the State, the liberal media will need to be complicit in smoothing the way via the ideological subversion of society in regards to their current, "Not All Muslims" narrative that is facilitating this sleepwalk into oblivion, as well as the current obsession with undermining masculinity (when a society has been culled of its everyman warriors - and the armed forces are under the absolute control of the State, there is nobody to stop a corrupt system of government), and the promotion of deviant behaviours; all signs of a civilisation heralding its own destruction as has been the case throughout the history of mankind when decadence and deviancy has led to the fall of nations and peoples.

2. The first part of the above scenario plays out, BUT the host population (whites) realise the severity of the situation before the tipping point. Tired of being cowed in their own country, they fight back. Civil war, blood on the streets, enclaves based on race and religion. The authorities try to restore calm, but the people will have been pushed beyond endurance. Serious stuff. Thankfully, the least likely outcome IMO.

3. My personal theory is that Islam and its followers are being given enough rope to hang themselves. The end result being that moments before the head-long hurtle into destruction, the non-Muslim populations will cry out to be saved by their governments - the very governments that will have fostered Islamic encroachment into every facet of western life, and when that happens the crackdown on Muslims will be unlike anything the world has ever seen. Their numbers will be purged and there will be nobody amongst the non-Muslims to object, because - and this is the genius of their demented plan - the people themselves will demand protection after years of butchery at the hands of Islamic fundamentalism and similar yet smaller-scale social infractions that have been facilitated by the establishment. I believe Muslims are being used as pawns in a terribly dangerous game where the victims will be the average man, woman, and child. Total control through a fall-guy, although in this case the fall "guy" will not be one man but an entire religion and its people.

[Ranjeet01]

And if anyone believes Sikhs living in these areas won't be on the receiving end of these marauding mobs of Islamic hate, then we're living in cloud cuckoo land.

Looking at the issue in the long-term, there's 3 ways I see this playing out in Europe. Btw, the United States is an unknown quantity or sorts; their 2nd Amendment could allow the situation to develop in one of two ways: A non-Muslim uprising against the corrupt establishment headed by, unfortunately, anti-minority militants heralding from the South, OR a ruthless government crackdown on such elements in order to send out a message to others with similar designs on taking on the state. Anyway, back to Europe.

1. Things are allowed to develop as they are at the moment, i.e. Muslim demographics continue to explode through birth-rates and the import of Muslim populations from the Middle East and Africa are allowed unperturbed into European countries. Eventually they'll out-breed non-Muslims, and of course, they will begin push for legislation that protects them and affords them privileges based on their religious and cultural requirements. If they manage to get enough of their own into every single political and social institution this will be a much easier process for them. Eventually, they WILL be the majority. However, if there is some resistance to Islamic infiltration into the machinery of the State, the liberal media will need to be complicit in smoothing the way via the ideological subversion of society in regards to their current, "Not All Muslims" narrative that is facilitating this sleepwalk into oblivion, as well as the current obsession with undermining masculinity (when a society has been culled of its everyman warriors - and the armed forces are under the absolute control of the State, there is nobody to stop a corrupt system of government), and the promotion of deviant behaviours; all signs of a civilisation heralding its own destruction as has been the case throughout the history of mankind when decadence and deviancy has led to the fall of nations and peoples.

2. The first part of the above scenario plays out, BUT the host population (whites) realise the severity of the situation before the tipping point. Tired of being cowed in their own country, they fight back. Civil war, blood on the streets, enclaves based on race and religion. The authorities try to restore calm, but the people will have been pushed beyond endurance. Serious stuff. Thankfully, the least likely outcome IMO.

3. My personal theory is that Islam and its followers are being given enough rope to hang themselves. The end result being that moments before the head-long hurtle into destruction, the non-Muslim populations will cry out to be saved by their governments - the very governments that will have fostered Islamic encroachment into every facet of western life, and when that happens the crackdown on Muslims will be unlike anything the world has ever seen. Their numbers will be purged and there will be nobody amongst the non-Muslims to object, because - and this is the genius of their demented plan - the people themselves will demand protection after years of butchery at the hands of Islamic fundamentalism and similar yet smaller-scale social infractions that have been facilitated by the establishment. I believe Muslims are being used as pawns in a terribly dangerous game where the victims will be the average man, woman, and child. Total control through a fall-guy, although in this case the fall "guy" will not be one man but an entire religion and its people.

The potential of this happening to Sikhs is how it will happen to Sikhs. We may very be "colateral damage".

Sikhs tend to be more spread out and dispersed and less ghetto-ised which may reduce the impact.

However with muslim ghetto-isation, they will be sitting targets.

I very much agree with your assertion that muslims are given the rope to hang themselves.

However, I cannot understand what the elites stand to gain from creating a problem in order to solve the problem many decades later.

The public are already mistrustful of the government and the political systems in place.

How much more control and power can the elites gain that they have not got already?

Are the elites really as smart as we think they are or are they also fallible?

[genie]

This is what happens when Muslims in western countries reach the magic 10% population mark (or 9.6% for the pedants out there).

BTW this video was made by a white nationalist reporter based in america back 4 or more years ago before the paris attacks before charlie hebdo abdul attacks before nice attacks.

When the white western elites in the ruling classes can see the problem but don't overtly speak out or bring in policies to change the situation then you know its their plans for this to happen and they are complicit in bringing in mass muslim migration for their next step in the world order they trying to set up.

[MisterrSingh]

However with muslim ghetto-isation, they will be sitting targets.

I very much agree with your assertion that muslims are given the rope to hang themselves.

However, I cannot understand what the elites stand to gain from creating a problem in order to solve the problem many decades later.

The public are already mistrustful of the government and the political systems in place.

How much more control and power can the elites gain that they have not got already?

Are the elites really as smart as we think they are or are they also fallible?

A compliant, grateful, and considerably manageable global population after decades of death and destruction would be an absolute boon to any authority. Once the dust has settled, all the blame will be placed at the feet of socialism, particularly the virulent strain of cultural Marxism that's sweeping the West at the moment. The subtext in such a situation will be, "Do you want to return to those dark days? No? Then don't challenge us, don't question us, and allow us carte-blanche to do as we see fit for your benefit."

I think there is an element of sadism that manifests itself once someone reaches a stage of wielding incredible power and control. Logically it is understandable that a person asks, "How much more power do these people need?" but in doing so I think we overlook Man's lust for as much as he can get away with regardless of whether he needs it or not. Once someone gets to that level of existence, it genuinely is a huge disconnect from reality. Normal rules of society don't apply to these people. They will continue to push all conceivable limits for as long as they can get away with it.

It's quite humbling for me to realise how the more the world begins to fall into confusion and unpredictability, the more I'm beginning to realise how many answers to these issues lie in core Sikh philosophy. The 5 vices and the subject of a balanced existence are a direct antidote to the corruption and subversion of these times. Anyway, that's another subject.

[MisterrSingh]

My God, they've reached Japan, lmao. What's their reason for behaving like beasts in Japan? How many Islamic colonies did Japan rule over, lol? These people...

[Jonny101]

Your assessment is correct. Germany with its low birth rate of native white german population is also at high risk of being islamised especially by the extremist salafi sect and then rise of far right gaining strength to counter that threat.

France is most likely to kick off first as the white french native population are begining to think very carefully about their liberal credentials and having such a huge muslim population in their nation. Russia is in danger too as their native Christian population has a low birth rate and they have a huge muslim migrant population.

All nations should basically have a covert policy banning muslims to migrate into their lands.... non-muslims should be given preference. And any muslims living in your lands should have no special treatments they should be forced to adopt the host nations customs and traditions. No conversions of non-muslims should be allowed only then a war can be prevented. But these easy and small steps wont be implement therefore war will come

Eastern Europeans are different from western Europeans. They don't have a white guilt like the westerners. And in the case Russians and Serbs who are orthodox Christians, they don't hold back when provoked and according to their beliefs they will one day reconquer Constantinople from the Muslims which is the ancient and spiritual capital of Orthodox Christianity.

[StarStriker]

My God, they've reached Japan, lmao. What's their reason for behaving like beasts in Japan? How many Islamic colonies did Japan rule over, lol? These people...

Wat the hell? i heard somewhere, that muslims/building of mosques were banned in japan, and permanant residency of muslims in japan was also banned....seems a lie then.