Jump to content

70+ Dead In French Terror Attack


Recommended Posts

Wat the hell? i heard somewhere, that muslims/building of mosques were banned in japan, and permanant residency of muslims in japan was also banned....seems a lie then.

There's 11 mosques in Japan.

A mosque in itself is the symbolic equivalent of planting a flag on a piece of land and declaring, "I claim this land for myself." Their history makes no bones about such things. The mosque is viewed as an outpost; an act of aggressive ownership.

Nowadays, in relative peacetime, it may seem harmless, but in future times their mosques will be used as staging posts for their activities, and any non-Islamic country and its government that allowed the construction of a mosque to be built on their land will come to regret it.

It could be argued that our Gurdwareh were also historically utilised as forts during turbulent times, but the difference being our ideology of self defence against hostiles, as opposed to the Islamic ideology of aggressive expansionism against the Kaffir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read that the guy who did this atrocious act was not a muslim.

He ate bacon, drank alcohol, never went to mosque and didn't observe ramadan.

I've read that he didn't do it for extremist reasons, he just wanted to commit suicide but he wanted to be remembered so he decided to do something big and unique.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Islamic State has claimed responsibility for the truck attack in Nice that killed 84 people, injured more than 200 and brought carnage to a Bastille Day fireworks celebration on Thursday night.

In a statement on Saturday, the news agency Amaq, which supports Isis, said: “The person who carried out the operation in Nice, France, to run down people was one of the soldiers of Islamic State. He carried out the operation in response to calls to target nationals of states that are part of the coalition fighting Islamic State.”

Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel, a 31-year-old Tunisian man with French residency status who lived in the Riviera city, drove a heavy-goods vehicle through a crowd that had gathered to watch the display on Nice’s Promenade des Anglais.

Later on Saturday, the Isis-operated radio station Bayan claimed that Lahouaiej-Bouhlel was a soldier who had completed a “new, special operation using a truck”. It also warned western nations that no security measures would spare them “from the blows of the mujahideen”.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/16/islamic-state-claims-responsibility-for-nice-truck-attack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eastern Europeans are different from western Europeans. They don't have a white guilt like the westerners. And in the case Russians and Serbs who are orthodox Christians, they don't hold back when provoked and according to their beliefs they will one day reconquer Constantinople from the Muslims which is the ancient and spiritual capital of Orthodox Christianity.

I was reading an opinion piece a few days ago about the current differences in attitude between Eastern Europe and Western Europe, and an idea suggested was that Eastern Europeans haven't given up a large part of their political and cultural authority to women; cultural authority being the key. This may seem almost misogynistic to some, but the argument being that there's a choice between having reason guide culture or having women do it, but not both.

I think the argument above, broadly, has some merit, but it's a tad more complex. For example, I know a handful of Poles from where I work, and we've had conversations about Punjabi / Sikh history and their own particular Polish historical and cultural figures that are revered by them to this day, and the similarities between them and us in that particular regard are quite striking. After WW2 it was Polish women who raised generations of strong men without huge male influence, and more importantly, in the modern era where white, middle-class, Ivy League / Oxbridge educated "snowflakes" are lecturing modern women on strength and independence, other women from less cossetted cultures were getting on with things decades ago without being told what to do.

The Poles have many female freedom fighters, political agitators, and generally tough women in their historical and cultural landscape, so like I said, scapegoating the entire female gender is inaccurate. I think a certain type of female (perhaps with a traditionally no-nonsense masculine "soul" or philosophy) can raise soormeh in times when the men are elsewhere or missing entirely. But I think those times are long gone. The female mind has been poisoned in the West. Family values, self-respect, and strength of mind are needed in the women of a society that has designs on thriving. When those qualities are absent, well, just look around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was reading an opinion piece a few days ago about the current differences in attitude between Eastern Europe and Western Europe, and an idea suggested was that Eastern Europeans haven't given up a large part of their political and cultural authority to women; cultural authority being the key. This may seem almost misogynistic to some, but the argument being that there's a choice between having reason guide culture or having women do it, but not both.

I think the argument above, broadly, has some merit, but it's a tad more complex. For example, I know a handful of Poles from where I work, and we've had conversations about Punjabi / Sikh history and their own particular Polish historical and cultural figures that are revered by them to this day, and the similarities between them and us in that particular regard are quite striking. After WW2 it was Polish women who raised generations of strong men without huge male influence, and more importantly, in the modern era where white, middle-class, Ivy League / Oxbridge educated "snowflakes" are lecturing modern women on strength and independence, other women from less cossetted cultures were getting on with things decades ago without being told what to do.

The Poles have many female freedom fighters, political agitators, and generally tough women in their historical and cultural landscape, so like I said, scapegoating the entire female gender is inaccurate. I think a certain type of female (perhaps with a traditionally no-nonsense masculine "soul" or philosophy) can raise soormeh in times when the men are elsewhere or missing entirely. But I think those times are long gone. The female mind has been poisoned in the West. Family values, self-respect, and strength of mind are needed in the women of a society that has designs on thriving. When those qualities are absent, well, just look around.

point is Khalsa embrace both halves of their energies and thus are complete , women become as strong mentally and emotionally as the Daddy's girls they need to be and the men become dayavaan and nuturing as their mother Mata Sahib Kaur ji.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My God, they've reached Japan, lmao. What's their reason for behaving like beasts in Japan? How many Islamic colonies did Japan rule over, lol? These people...

They know that they will overtake the native population sooner than in the west as it well known that Japan has a major population drop off ... there are more oldies than youngsters .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read that the guy who did this atrocious act was not a muslim.

He ate bacon, drank alcohol, never went to mosque and didn't observe ramadan.

I've read that he didn't do it for extremist reasons, he just wanted to commit suicide but he wanted to be remembered so he decided to do something big and unique.

new facts coming out , he had violent behaviour he beat his wife and even attacked his motherinlaw causing the estrangement from his wife . He was a member of a local gym Bodybuilding and had gotten kicked out of salsa classes for getting controlling/obsessive over the women there. He had sent out coded messages saying 'bring more weapons ' so was part of a cell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read that the guy who did this atrocious act was not a muslim.

He ate bacon, drank alcohol, never went to mosque and didn't observe ramadan.

I've read that he didn't do it for extremist reasons, he just wanted to commit suicide but he wanted to be remembered so he decided to do something big and unique.

EVERY time a muslim commits a hate crime in Western lands rumors immediatly spread how he was such a bad muslim. Not falling for that anymore.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was reading an opinion piece a few days ago about the current differences in attitude between Eastern Europe and Western Europe, and an idea suggested was that Eastern Europeans haven't given up a large part of their political and cultural authority to women; cultural authority being the key. This may seem almost misogynistic to some, but the argument being that there's a choice between having reason guide culture or having women do it, but not both.

I think the argument above, broadly, has some merit, but it's a tad more complex. For example, I know a handful of Poles from where I work, and we've had conversations about Punjabi / Sikh history and their own particular Polish historical and cultural figures that are revered by them to this day, and the similarities between them and us in that particular regard are quite striking. After WW2 it was Polish women who raised generations of strong men without huge male influence, and more importantly, in the modern era where white, middle-class, Ivy League / Oxbridge educated "snowflakes" are lecturing modern women on strength and independence, other women from less cossetted cultures were getting on with things decades ago without being told what to do.

The Poles have many female freedom fighters, political agitators, and generally tough women in their historical and cultural landscape, so like I said, scapegoating the entire female gender is inaccurate. I think a certain type of female (perhaps with a traditionally no-nonsense masculine "soul" or philosophy) can raise soormeh in times when the men are elsewhere or missing entirely. But I think those times are long gone. The female mind has been poisoned in the West. Family values, self-respect, and strength of mind are needed in the women of a society that has designs on thriving. When those qualities are absent, well, just look around.

The Polish are a very macho culture like other Slavic nations, the Polish women respect and prefer masculine males rather than the feminised types.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use