Jump to content

Kashmir protests and killings


mrggg123
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, CEO said:

Damn Pakistani people can't get enough. They ruined their country, now trying to ruin another region. If only we were able to demolish these people. 

its not always the people, its mostly the gov and armies and their egos. Lets not forget India are no saints themselves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Why do some Sikhs expect helping the Muslims would benefit us in anyway? All we have to do is a see a BasicsOfSikhi video featuring a person Muslim debate to see that they really won't be friendly. What will they, (Muslims), do to Sikhs when they get yet another country for themselves? (Our people bow way too much to Muslims these days, just look at that Sunny Hundal).

When did I say help Muslims? But Kashmir issue is a very important issue for all of South Asia. And Punjab is right next door to all this. We are currently living at times which will have very serious future consequences. All of the Muslim population of Kashmir is in rebellion. Indian army has 7 lakh soldiers stationed there. India is currently being ruled by the most hard-line Hindu politician(Modi) who has a reputation of using violence against Muslims which is partly the reason Hindus in India elected him. Muslim Jihadis are also getting more extreme and confident especially due to their successful Jihad in the middle East and in Afghanistan. Both of these extreme elements(Hindus & Muslims) are headed for a clash. And that clash will be over Kashmir. Next few years we might see chaotic like situation in the Indian Sub continent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrggg123 said:

its not always the people, its mostly the gov and armies and their egos. Lets not forget India are no saints themselves. 

India is even worse. What is Government, army made up of? People. And these people infuence other people. They then start forming up as "people" rather than the government etc. The people are just as "bad" as any government. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
13 minutes ago, Jonny101 said:

You know, the same can be said of India

The Bharat that our people died for doesn't even exist in the modern world, when India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh would be one country, and our people wouldn't lose most of their land from Hindus and Muslims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jonny101 said:

Define India? If by India you mean the artificial state that the British created in 1947, then no. But if by India you mean a continent of independent nations and regions as it always has been historically then yes I agree with you much like Europe is a continent with many independent nations and regions. One just needs to read Mahabharat and see what was the geography of India back then. It was never an artificial one nation centralized state as it is now. Bharat was full of independent kingdoms. Back then Punjab was called Madhardesh

great post! Btw, who gave panjab the name panjab? Was it genghis khan? Coz i know that it was formerly called the sapt sindhu (land of 7 rivers), which is panjab + sindh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
1 hour ago, Jonny101 said:

Define India? If by India you mean the artificial state that the British created in 1947, then no. But if by India you mean a continent of independent nations and regions as it always has been historically then yes I agree with you much like Europe is a continent with many independent nations and regions. One just needs to read Mahabharat and see what was the geography of India back then. It was never an artificial one nation centralized state as it is now. Bharat was full of independent kingdoms. Back then Punjab was called Madhardesh

Why was Punjab so easily conquered before Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji? Indo-Aryans, Greeks, Persians, Afghans, and Mughals, now the British and Indians, as well as Pakistan owned Punjab, all seemed to have their ownership of Punjab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Why was Punjab so easily conquered before Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji? Indo-Aryans, Greeks, Persians, Afghans, and Mughals, now the British and Indians, as well as Pakistan owned Punjab, all seemed to have their ownership of Punjab.

Its not a coincidence that when the tribes of panjab become sikhs, that the indigenous population of panjab finally put a stop to outside invaders. What makes me laugh is how panjabi muslims have been the majority community in panjab for many centuries now (600+yrs), yet they havnt once been rulers of panjab, and were subservient to mughals/afghans, who all treated em like sh!t, yet it was under kuffar sikh kingdoms were they left alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use