Jump to content

Kashmir protests and killings


mrggg123
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

The Bharat that our people died for doesn't even exist in the modern world, when India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh would be one country, and our people wouldn't lose most of their land from Hindus and Muslims.

in that case there would have been no sikh majority punjab. Partition was painful but at the end of day both communities got benefited from it;  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Preeet said:

Don't you think Punjab could have come from sanskrit? As in Pancha means 5, and Aaap means water.. So it makes PanchAap/Punjab.

no, punjab is not Sanskrit but Persian. This is common knowledge. Sanskrit word for water is aapaH. So if it was Sanskrit it would have been PunchaapaH not matching the Persian Punjaab

Personally I don't have a problem with the Persian language. All our Gurus learned this language and used Persian words extensively in Gurbani. Especially Guru Gobind Singh Jee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
3 hours ago, Preeet said:

but kaur ji, it has the same meaning from sanskrit, and of course the punjabi language is also from sanskrit/indo aryan and not the iranic/dardic side.

Punjabi before Guru Sahib was only in Shahmukhi, Punjabi isn't an Indo-Aryan language which may confuse people from it's location in the world. Also the massive amount of Islamic conquests bringing their Sharia from time to time made huge impacts to Hindi, (the word Hindu is a persian word, before these people were called Sindhu, then the Persians gave the word to the conquered people the same as thieves).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Punjabi before Guru Sahib was only in Shahmukhi, Punjabi isn't an Indo-Aryan language which may confuse people from it's location in the world. Also the massive amount of Islamic conquests bringing their Sharia from time to time made huge impacts to Hindi, (the word Hindu is a persian word, before these people were called Sindhu, then the Persians gave the word to the conquered people the same as thieves).

Before Gurmukhi, Punjabi was written in the Landa script which was almost the same as the Gurmukhi script. The Landa script or very similarly related scripts were used all over Punjab, Sindh, Jammu and Kashmir areas. The Gurus modified it and added LagaMatra. Only the Sufi Saints wrote in the arabic script. Gurmukhi is the indiginous script of Punjab. The Devnagri and the Arabic(Shahmukhi) scripts are both foreign scripts to Punjab and surrounding areas. Only the Sikh people have enough self respect to use the indigenous script of the land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
4 hours ago, Jonny101 said:

Punjab being a formation of two Persian words Punj and Aab is common knowledge that even school going infants in Punjab know. Yet you are arguing the opposite. If Punjab is a Sanskrit word then why arent you and everyone else calling it a weird word like PunchAapaah? why is Punjab pronounced exactly like the Persian Punj aab? Due to invasions and centuries of cultural exchanges, the persian language has had a huge impact on the Punjabi langauge much like English has many French loan words

 

Punjabi was never written in Devnagri. Where did you get this info from? Have you ever read a text book on the history of Punjabi or Gurmukhi? Read about the Language politics that occurred in UP/Avadh/Bihar areas between Hindus and Muslims in the 1800s. Devnagri was an ancient script used to write Sanskrit. It was only revived during the mid 1800s by Hindu nationalists who wanted to sanskritise Hindustani while the Muslims wanted to Persianise Hindustani langauge. This resulted in the distinct formations of Hindi and Urdu.  Due to the influence of Arya Samaj, the Punjabi Hindus also began advocating Devnagri and Hindi languages.Seeing this pro Devnagri and Hindi stance of Punjabi Hindus, Giani Dit Singh of the Singh Sabha also had written a book proving their pro Hindi and pro Devnagri arguments wrong. Himachal and Haryana have only adopted Devnagri scripts recently in the past few decades. In the case of Himachal for centuries they used their own Pahari script which was related to the Punjabi Landa script. Not sprirsingly since Pahari is basically a dialect of Punjabi itself. And Haryanvi language which is similarly related to Rajasthani never had any Devnagri script.

 

 

Your arguing with someone who believes Sikhi supports the idea of Hindu rituals, is it really worth arguing her? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use