Jump to content
shastarSingh

Proof of Sikhs eating Meat in 17th Century!

Recommended Posts

Guest Jacfsing2
15 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

Read the post again some other time.  Clearly your anger is not allowing you to read my post as it was written.  Put the carrot down or better yet, use it as a pointer and read my post again.

Daas re-read your post, trying to get the bits and pieces, sorry for previous temper towards you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2
5 minutes ago, muscleman said:

Yes, but haven't become a Mahapurakh yet.  Still learning Sikhi. Still a learner in a primary class.  Still not become a daas. 

Good luck bro on your journey, but don't give-up on the thin path, we are all growing slowly, hopefully one day we can all learn to accept differences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2
1 minute ago, muscleman said:

Wow!! This is so interesting.  How come you know all this for a Sikh?  I thought as a Sikh one could never speak about other religions?  I am intrigued.

While on the personal journey from pre-Amritdhari days, Daas was a soul-searcher, also one of the 52 Hukams is to learn about different religions, "Doosrae mataa dae pustak, vidyaa parhnee. Pur bhrosaa drirh Gurbanee, Akaal Purakh tae karnaa|

Study the books and beliefs of other faiths. But maintain trust in Gurbani and Akal Purakh [Undying divine personification]." (31) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2
3 minutes ago, muscleman said:

Wow! You must be a very enlightened person, then? I am very happy for you. 

No, what Daas has is the DESIRE to BE enlightened, not at that level.

3 minutes ago, muscleman said:

Thank you mate.  I hope I can call you 'mate?' Bul chuk maf.

O.k, bro, but try not wasting time on topics for arguments in the future. (We could work towards something if we use our time wisely).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, shastarSingh said:

They believe that all the Gurus are the same as Nanak. The Sikhs are not restricted in the matter of eating or drinking

 

 
-Mohsin Fani, 'Dabistan-e-Mazahib.'

Im suprised with all the dumb bickering on this thread, nobody has bothered pointing out this part. This cant b right surely? Sharab being permissable?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, StarStriker said:

Im suprised with all the dumb bickering on this thread, nobody has bothered pointing out this part. This cant b right surely? Sharab being permissable?

 
 

This is the same guy that posted in another thread saying that when he consumed marijuana, he was able to jap naam non-stop for three days. Dude, 'cause you were high! 

Next he'll be saying sex before marriage is permissible because a sikh isn't restricted in anything, and naam removes all our karam. lol And he'll be sure to have all the historians back this up (other than Gurbani or rehit) ;)

Edited by Berserk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, StarStriker said:

Im suprised with all the dumb bickering on this thread, nobody has bothered pointing out this part. This cant b right surely? Sharab being permissable?

bro , outside observers can get things wrong ...plus you have got to remember they have their own agendas ...can't criticise our valour or high morals so put in question marks and doubts about something else...maybe he is referring to shaheedi degh because muslims would consider that haram  in bhang form ...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Berserk said:

This is the same guy that posted in another thread saying that when he consumed marijuana, he was able to jap naam non-stop for three days. Dude, 'cause you were high! 

Next he'll be saying sex before marriage is permissible because a sikh isn't restricted in anything, and naam removes all our karam. lol And he'll be sure to have all the historians back this up (other than Gurbani or rehit) ;)

its not marijuana, its called shaheedi degh and I was not high.After having shaheedi degh(with 5 patte) i did simran for 4 hours at a stretch and this 4 hour stretch helped me to do simran for next few days.

Moreover this topic is about meat and not shaheedi degh. 

If tomorrow people from sweden, denmark, greenland, siberia etc decide to become Sikh, will they be able to survive on vegetarian diet ? The answer is NO.

will u tell these lakhs of people to relocate to places with moderate climate ?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

its not marijuana, its called shaheedi degh and I was not high.After having shaheedi degh(with 5 patte) i did simran for 4 hours at a stretch and this 4 hour stretch helped me to do simran for next few days.

Moreover this topic is about meat and not shaheedi degh. 

If tomorrow people from sweden, denmark, greenland, siberia etc decide to become Sikh, will they be able to survive on vegetarian diet ? The answer is NO.

will u tell these lakhs of people to relocate to places with moderate climate ?

 

bro they do have growing seasons and they do have veggies , in modern scenario there is not so much of an excuse to eat maas ...especially khulla maas due to the immense berahimi with which it is produced ...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, kangw said:

This topic is to do with intoxication too!  Marijuana induces intoxication too.

If tomorrow, people from Sweden, Denmark, Siberia decide to become Sikhs, they will have to effing adapt to Sikhi Rules and not the other effing way around, you fool! They can either follow the Rules, OR they can get LOST and take you along with them. They are NOT SUPERIOR to Sikhi!  Sallah badmash.

As far as relocation is effing concerned, one relocates to where one's mouth is fed, where one can do an honest day's kiratt to feed one's effing family and have an effing roof over one and one's family's head!  

You don't need to imbibe shaheedi degh to get intoxicated, your hankaar is enough to give you the high.  You are the most foolish forum participant on this forum apart from one or two others.  

lol

thanks for the lovely post and thanks for praising me so much!

U talk about the rules? Other than one jathebandi, all panthic organizations believe that bajjar kurehit is HALAT MEAT EATEN BY MUSLIMS. 

There is so much evidence in the history that sikhs used to eat meat.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's a great deed in itself to have the Gurus Roop but sadly most women decide not to. We should encourage men and women alike don't get me wrong, but girls tend to feel more insecure about the way they look in the first place.   Chup kar. 
    • I've always wondered what the first edition covered that caused so much upset in the colonialist establishment of the time?       “ONE OF THE MOST VALUABLE BOOKS EVER PUBLISHED IN CONNECTION WITH INDIAN HISTORY”: RARE FIRST EDITION OF CUNNINGHAM’S HISTORY OF THE SIKHS, 1849, HANDSOMELY BOUND (INDIA) CUNNINGHAM, Joseph Davey. A History of the Sikhs, from the Origin of the Nation to the Battles of the Sutlej. London: John Murray, 1849. Octavo, modern full brown calf, raised bands, burgundy morocco spine label.$4800. First edition, with map of Punjabi political divisions until 1803 outlined in color, color folding map of Punjabi political divisions after the treaty of 1846, and folding genealogical table of the Gooroos, handsomely bound. Cunningham joined the Bengal Engineers in 1831 and arrived in India in 1834. “In 1837 he was selected by Lord Auckland to join Colonel Claud Wade, who was then the political agent upon the Sikh frontier, as assistant, with the special duty of fortifying Firozpur, the agent’s headquarters. This appointment brought him into close connection with the Sikhs, and, as he spent the next eight years of his life in political employments in this part of India, he was able to obtain that thorough knowledge of their manners and customs which makes his History of the Sikhs one of the most valuable books ever published in connection with Indian history. In 1838 he was present at the interview between Lord Auckland and Runjeet Singh, the great Sikh chieftain; in 1839 he accompanied Colonel Wade when he forced the Khyber Pass, and he was promoted first lieutenant on 20 May in that year; in 1840 he was placed in charge of Ludhiana, under G. Russell Clerk, Colonel Wade’s successor, and as political officer accompanied Brigadier-general Shelton and his army through the Sikh territory to Peshawur on his way to Cabul, and then accompanied Colonel Wheeler and Dost Muhammad, the deposed ameer of Afghanistan, back to British territory; in 1841 he was sent on a special mission to the principality of Jammu; in 1842 he was present at the interview between Lord Ellenborough and Dost Muhammad and the Sikhs… He spent four years on [the History], and on its publication in 1849 it was received with the greatest favor by the English press, a verdict which posterity has ratified, for it is universally recognized as the one authority upon the subject. But though this history made his name as an historian, it brought him into deep disgrace with his superiors. In his last chapter he treated of the history of the first Sikh war, and in it he made use of the knowledge he had obtained while acting as political agent with the army in the field, and distinctly asserted that two of the Sikh generals, Lal Singh and Tej Singh, were bought. Both Lord Hardinge and Colonel Henry Lawrence, who had acted as political agent after the death of Major Broadfoot, asserted that there had been no private negotiations with any of the Sikh leaders; but the confidential position which Cunningham had held, and still more his disgrace which followed, are strong arguments that such negotiations did pass” (DNB). As a result of the controversy, Cunningham was stripped of his authority and ordered to go on regular regimental duty. He lost most of his income in the process and any possibility of political advancement. Indeed, the publication of The History of the Sikhs marked the end of his career. He was known primarily for revealing confidential documents and his great accomplishments were little recognized, The History of the Sikhs having been largely suppressed. Cunningham died unexpectedly in 1851. Indeed, the second edition—featuring Cunningham’s own corrections and additions—was not published until 1853, too late for Cunningham’s reputation to matter. Folding map expertly linen-backed, interior generally quite nice, binding fine. A lovely copy in fine condition.   https://www.baumanrarebooks.com/rare-books/cunningham-joseph-davey/history-of-the-sikhs/89967.aspx
    • Like a UK SGPC........ Guaranteed corruption, and our enemies will know exactly who to target for compromising our community. 
×

Important Information

Terms of Use