Jump to content

Grooming at universitys


Big_Tera
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Jacfsing2
54 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

What are SJWs?

 

If Trump voted against the Iraq war, then he has some moral authority. The tossers from here (England) and the US who decided to jump into Iraq and remove Saddam are responsible for everything we see there i.e. the ISIS and the mass refugee crisis. 

One thing I like about Trump is that he isn't into all the regime change sh1t. If we've learnt anything in the 21st century it's that removing a dictator on some bullsh1t, dubious, moral crusade can release something 100 x worse.

SJW's are Social Justice Warriors, they basically support Muslims and also hate anything about men. Trump was against the Iraq War way back in the day, while Hillary supported it. How would you explain the European grooming cases not just against our people, but also against other Subcontinentals, Whites, and the Orientals against the rise of grooming from Muslims?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
29 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Some might call it "grooming" but there's a few who walk into it with their eyes open. It's called "dating." The fact that Muslims and Sikhs date, especially in university, is an uncomfortable reality we need to acknowledge. Not all such encounters result in the innocent, gullible Sikh girl being drugged, then having pictures of her taken in a state of undress, that the Muslah then threatens to show said pictures to her family. 

Again, enough with this white knighting rubbish. Why are we trying to save these girls who don't see themselves as victims? They're more likely to turn around and tell you to mind your own business.

Approach this issue with the mindset that these Sikh girls aren't chunni-wearing damsels in danger of being dishonoured, and you'll begin to get to the reality of the situation.

Grooming does happen. I'm not denying that. But how many of those cases where the Sikh girl enters into a sordid brief encounter with a Muslim for it to go south ("I'm away from home for the first time in my life; let's have some fun"), which she then turns around into an "I was groomed" narrative to save face amongst her family and community? And we swallow it every time.

What about the Swedes getting raped, if our people are Libtards that's one thing, but there are going to still be problems wherever there are Muslims, the Europeans should have never been unintelligent enough to have allowed Syrian Refugees, and now they are making a mockery of the natives there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jacfsing2 said:

What about the Swedes getting raped, if our people are Libtards that's one thing, but there are going to still be problems wherever there are Muslims, the Europeans should have never been unintelligent enough to have allowed Syrian Refugees, and now they are making a mockery of the natives there.

What's that got to do with the situation on campuses? Are Syrian and Iraqi men enrolling onto marketing or business degrees and seducing Punjabi females?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Anywhere you get Muslims, you are guarnteed problems for everyone. Muslims wouldn't even dare to try to groom Sikhs in America, because people here have stood-up to Sharia and prevented to Islam solution, like Europeans have to go through on a daily basis.

Grooming had being on due to the shee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I fail to understand is why these girls are dating people of a faith widely known to hate non muslims?  It does not make sence. Why are they open to being used and abused by people who see them as infidels that are going to hell. This is just self humiliation and disrespect of the highest order.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
26 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

What's that got to do with the situation on campuses? Are Syrian and Iraqi men enrolling onto marketing or business degrees and seducing Punjabi females?

Daas would rather not waste the celebration of Vaheguru revealing himself from 1469, to argue on Muslims, so Lakh Lakh Vidaya on this special day. If you don't believe that Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji was Vaheguru, then still may he still give you his blessings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

What about the Swedes getting raped, if our people are Libtards that's one thing, but there are going to still be problems wherever there are Muslims, the Europeans should have never been unintelligent enough to have allowed Syrian Refugees, and now they are making a mockery of the natives there.

It is not the syrians here who are doing the grooming it's well establish bradford and brum pakistani musleh , now others are joining them. The swedes are getting a mixed salafi bag from the start they are on an accelerated curve. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

What I fail to understand is why these girls are dating people of a faith widely known to hate non muslims?  It does not make sence. Why are they open to being used and abused by people who see them as infidels that are going to hell. This is just self humiliation and disrespect of the highest order.

 

Our newer generations have succumbed to the "All paths lead to the One / GGS Ji featured Bani of Hindu and Muslim (for argument's sake) bhagats / A Muslim laid the foundation stone of Harmandir Sahib.. etc" faction of certain types of Sikhs who are trying their utmost to turn the Sikh faith, particularly in the West, into some sort of flimsy, rule-less, Southeast Asian spiritual, pick n' choose past-time, as opposed to a religion with certain requirements for its followers.

The above three examples I've given are all true without a doubt, but they're being taken and emphasised to extremes at the expense of other equally valid  Sikh facts, because those aforementioned three aspects of Sikhi promote a free, less rigid way of following Sikhi, which is apparently ideal for our shallow and increasingly irreligious people.

5 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Daas would rather not waste the celebration of Vaheguru revealing himself from 1469, to argue on Muslims, so Lakh Lakh Vidaya on this special day. If you don't believe that Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji was Vaheguru, then still may he still give you his blessings. 

Why would any sane person even mention such a thing? Are you having a dig for some unfathomable reason?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use