Jump to content

The Christian menace to Sikhi in Canada


Guest Jagsaw_Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

Are those evangelicals protestant? 

 

13 hours ago, puzzled said:

evangelicals are protestants. its basically the same thing 

It's not the same thing. Evangelicals are Protestants, but not all Protestants are evangelicals.

Evangelical comes from the Greek meaning "good news". Basically, all non-Christians are going to Hell, and evangelicals believe in spreading the "good news" that you can be saved from going to Hell by accepting Jesus.

Now do you understand why they are constantly trying to convert everybody? 

In their mind, they're just doing you a favor, even if by deception.

Older, more established churches tend to be Protestant, but not evangelical. Such as most Anglicans and Methodists. They are more moderate and usually mind their own business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BhForce said:

It's not the same thing. Evangelicals are Protestants, but not all Protestants are evangelicals

Well yh  evangelicals are protestants but not all protestants are evangelicals because protestant is an umbrella term for the many reform movements that separated themselves from the catholic church including the church of England. Protestant comes from the word protest. The movements started of as protests against the pope and all that catholic stuff.      King henry the 8th saw these protests and reformers as a ticket to break off from catholic church and get a divorce and make himself head of the english church 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, puzzled said:

King henry the 8th saw these protests and reformers as a ticket to break off from catholic church and get a divorce and make himself head of the english church 

And chop off a few of his wives heads off..........great foundation for a 'religion'!

9 hours ago, BhForce said:

Older, more established churches tend to be Protestant, but not evangelical. Such as most Anglicans and Methodists. They are more moderate and usually mind their own business.

Unless they are attacking, colonising and committing genocide on another nonwhite nation......

 

9 hours ago, BhForce said:

Evangelical comes from the Greek meaning "good news". Basically, all non-Christians are going to Hell, and evangelicals believe in spreading the "good news" that you can be saved from going to Hell by accepting Jesus.

Oh, okay I get it! Basically just like sullay without the melanin though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

And chop off a few of his wives heads off..........great foundation for a 'religion'!

Yup!  Fornicator, adulterer, murderer, tyrant, and head of the church!   Not too different to when prince Charles is gonna become king and head of church! 

Popes who are heads of the catholic church were no different!  Murderers, tyrants, carried out massacres,  inquisitions, Some popes even used to hold orgies in the vatican because they felt their sins would be forgiven because they were "chosen"   some popes even slept with their sisters.   Popes have one of the darkest and  most evil history. Catholic church is responsible for the death of millions of people. 

It's one of the reasons why our gurus didnt give authority to any king or priest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/21/2020 at 12:23 PM, BhForce said:

Thanks for point this out. Though, there's also the fact that all Christians are not unified in that belief. It's true the Bible states that there are satan-derived religions, but that's different from saying a specific region is of the devil.

Some Christian preachers make that connection. Other denominations (like Unitarians) explicitly reject that.

Christian Internet / YouTube preachers have devised a method of grouping and dismissing all non-Semetic Eastern faiths as religions that promote and practice the Occult. It's a lazy and quicker way of warding off potential curiosity into an alternative religious path, or even just cordial feelings on the part of those Christians who aren't perhaps as informed on the details of other faiths, and therefore more susceptible to keeping ties and friendships with the likes of us. 

Scare the flock into believing we sacrifice chickens in a pentagram, and conduct séances to summon demons, and most people would run a mile. It's deviously effective and eliminates the need for time consuming debate and vichaar which might inadvertently highlight deficiencies in Christian thought. Unfortunately, they have the benefit of the doubt on their side in the minds of Westerners and those influenced by Western thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Scare the flock into believing we sacrifice chickens in a pentagram, and conduct séances to summon demons, and most people would run a mile. It's deviously effective and eliminates the need for time consuming debate and vichaar which might inadvertently highlight deficiencies in Christian thought.

Yup. Funny and accurate.

As for the Unitarians, they believe that when Jesus gave his sacrifice for humanity (as in their view), he gave it that one time for all humanity. You don't need to "accept" it by promising yourself to Jesus as your "Lord and Savior". That's why they call themselves "universalists".

By the way, that particular theory of sacrifice is referred to by some (liberal) Christians as God saving humanity from the wrath of God by sacrificing himself to God. Because otherwise everybody would go to Hell. For not being Christian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jigsaw_Puzzled_Singh

It's funny you're all saying what you're saying about Christians now but....I do recall....when there was a Christian girl here on this forum to 'spread the love of Jesus' I was the only one that took her on and you all held her in in support. Remember that ? Hypocrisy much ?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Christian Internet / YouTube preachers have devised a method of grouping and dismissing all non-Semetic Eastern faiths as religions that promote and practice the Occult. It's a lazy and quicker way of warding off potential curiosity into an alternative religious path, or even just cordial feelings on the part of those Christians who aren't perhaps as informed on the details of other faiths, and therefore more susceptible to keeping ties and friendships with the likes of us. 

Scare the flock into believing we sacrifice chickens in a pentagram, and conduct séances to summon demons, and most people would run a mile. It's deviously effective and eliminates the need for time consuming debate and vichaar which might inadvertently highlight deficiencies in Christian thought. Unfortunately, they have the benefit of the doubt on their side in the minds of Westerners and those influenced by Western thought.

In Europe there has been a rapid decline in Christianity. 

In the heyday of Christianity in the 1600s Europe, witchcraft was commonplace. 

If you look at pre-Christian Europe, there does seem to be elements of Dharma. 

Christianity took a lot from Greek philosophy as well since parts of the Eastern Mediterranean was Greek speaking.

Since the "enlightenment ", it seems that there has been a gradual move away from Christianity. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

In Europe there has been a rapid decline in Christianity. 

In the heyday of Christianity in the 1600s Europe, witchcraft was commonplace. 

If you look at pre-Christian Europe, there does seem to be elements of Dharma. 

Christianity took a lot from Greek philosophy as well since parts of the Eastern Mediterranean was Greek speaking.

Since the "enlightenment ", it seems that there has been a gradual move away from Christianity. 

The so-called Enlightenment was the beginning and the precursor to today's humanist liberalism, which is the Enlightenment on super steroids, where the individual is "God". 

You're correct in saying there was a mystical and rather Dharmic aspect to much of Christianity before that period, particularly where the great seats of learning were locatec from as far back as the Hellenic non-Christian period. The Church was to all intents and purposes the lingering remnants of the Roman Empire. It downsized and rebranded itself mostly out of necessity and outside pressure. 

The contemporary radical who lives by the doctrine of his learned comrades of previous centuries, lol, delights in the fall of the Church in the West, but what's arisen in its place? A soul-less, deviant, dead-eyed pursuit of materialism and self-gratification where the Self reigns supreme.

Modern Christianity is a mockery of its previous form. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Christian Internet / YouTube preachers have devised a method of grouping and dismissing all non-Semetic Eastern faiths as religions that promote and practice the Occult. It's a lazy and quicker way of warding off potential curiosity into an alternative religious path, or even just cordial feelings on the part of those Christians who aren't perhaps as informed on the details of other faiths, and therefore more susceptible to keeping ties and friendships with the likes of us. 

Scare the flock into believing we sacrifice chickens in a pentagram, and conduct séances to summon demons, and most people would run a mile. It's deviously effective and eliminates the need for time consuming debate and vichaar which might inadvertently highlight deficiencies in Christian thought. Unfortunately, they have the benefit of the doubt on their side in the minds of Westerners and those influenced by Western thought.

I think they are a bit scared of the growing popularity of meditation in the west  (from various dharmic traditions) and how this affects the psyche of the rigid minded Abrahamic victims, freeing them of a lot of the dogmatic silliness therin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use