Jump to content

Hypocritical "Sikhs"


Khalistanisinghni
 Share

Recommended Posts

WJKK WJKF,

it is sometimes funny how majority of the Sikh kaum loves bhindranwale, claim to believe that are sant/mahapurkh but very few actually follow them?

in local area, some uncles continuously ask kavishers to sing about bhindranwale and the same uncles invite anti-gurmat parchariks to the area. 

Taksal is currently not following the maryada left by either Baba Thakur Singh ji or other mahapurkhs of taksal. Other jathebandis like AKJ don't accept raagmala. While some aren't to believe Charitropkyan to be bani.

are we lying to ourselves when we call them "sant baba jarnail singh ji khalsa bhindranwale"? They surely contributed to the panth and have clarified on other points. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Khalistanisinghni said:

WJKK WJKF,

it is sometimes funny how majority of the Sikh kaum loves bhindranwale, claim to believe that are sant/mahapurkh but very few actually follow them?

in local area, some uncles continuously ask kavishers to sing about bhindranwale and the same uncles invite anti-gurmat parchariks to the area. 

Taksal is currently not following the maryada left by either Baba Thakur Singh ji or other mahapurkhs of taksal. Other jathebandis like AKJ don't accept raagmala. While some aren't to believe Charitropkyan to be bani.

are we lying to ourselves when we call them "sant baba jarnail singh ji khalsa bhindranwale"? They surely contributed to the panth and have clarified on other points. 

 

Please Akj and Ragmaala - it is not correct to state ALL jatha members feel the same , many still recite ragmaala it is left as an individual decision.  All of Dasam Bani is accepted by all the older generation and Mahapurakhs  , maybe there are some unpard people now who refuse Charitropakyan because they do not understand why or what it is  but I do not think it is a majority stance .

Given we know that all the jathedars of the taksal were selected by the standard of their jeevan and personality prior to Dhumma It is not hard to understand them to be brahamgyani especially the effect their presence had on people . Dhumma was a minor figure who was abroad and nobody knew well and it is clear he is not even close to the level of his predecessors in terms of khirdaar.I would object to placing Sant before his name but only him .

Sant ji was the real deal , evil people are still scared of his name long after his time with us , his words still have the immense strength in them and the youth getting exposure to them are still being transformed .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
53 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

I would object to placing Sant before his name but only him . Sant ji was the real deal , evil people are still scared of his name long after his time with us , his words still have the immense strength in them and the youth getting exposure to them are still being transformed .

What's wrong with calling Jathedars of Taksal Sant, (not Dhumma or the modern Jathedars), each one of them were Mahapurukhs from it's founding of Baba Deep Singh Ji/(some say Bhai Mani Singh Ji) till Baba Thakur Singh Ji. (There were a few Nirmallas there and there, but their influence is long gone as well as Sewapanthis).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

What's wrong with calling Jathedars of Taksal Sant, (not Dhumma or the modern Jathedars), each one of them were Mahapurukhs from it's founding of Baba Deep Singh Ji/(some say Bhai Mani Singh Ji) till Baba Thakur Singh Ji. (There were a few Nirmallas there and there, but their influence is long gone as well as Sewapanthis).

I meant I would only object to adding to Dhummas name ....(sorry for the line break)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

sorry Bhen ji I don't understand ... I am speaking from actual real people experience not videos

I mean I have been watching videos of those anti-raagmala and saying all sorts of things to prove their point. So I came up a "generalisation" which according to your experience is false

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use