Jump to content

Turkish Referendum: Erdogan Victorious


MisterrSingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Another in a succession of intriguing recent political events that has the potential to shape contemporary world history, was yesterday's constitutional referendum in Turkey. After last July's failed coup and subsequent declaration of an indefinite state of emergency that's been extended for a further 3 months, Turks yesterday went to the polls to vote, in essence, on the granting of presidential powers to the current incumbent of the Turkish presidency, Tayyip Erdogan, as well as other potential future leaders. Erdogan won which means he can potentially rule until 2029 providing he wins the necessary elections.

Opinions? Is Turkey on the road to a dictatorship? What does this mean for European relations and ties between Turkey and the Middle East? Was the supposed coup a modern Kristallnacht designed to lend Erdogan a pretence under which he could strengthen his grip on Turkey? Or is he a patriot for putting his country's interests before any other foreign considerations, and democracy has had its day? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 5akaalsingh said:

With such behaviour, one thing is clear; you simply can't join the EU.

I think they have the perfect excuse not to curb the oncoming migrant wave that's headed for Europe. In a way it's quite heartening to see someone like Erdogan thumbing his nose at these weak and cowardly European leaders, but as you say, the Kurds are in for a torrid time. I do think he'll eventually go too far towards an Islamic autocracy over the next decade or so, and when that happens things will be a mess for the whole country. In the meantime, it'll be curious to see who he reaches out to in a diplomatic sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Does that mean he wants to take on the Arabs?

That may be a possibility. 

He definitely wants to have some degree of influence.

The Ottoman empire did lord it over the Arabs in present Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and other parts of the Arab world.

He does not want Kurds to gain too much power in Iraq and Syria because it would make the Kurds in Turkey very restless.

He does not want Iran to have too much of an influence either. The Ottomans and Iran (when it was the Safavid empire) used to come to blows in the same region.

Even before Islam, it seems there were the same problems when there was the Byzantines and the Sassanids. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

That may be a possibility. 

He definitely wants to have some degree of influence.

The Ottoman empire did lord it over the Arabs in present Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and other parts of the Arab world.

He does not want Kurds to gain too much power in Iraq and Syria because it would make the Kurds in Turkey very restless.

He does not want Iran to have too much of an influence either. The Ottomans and Iran (when it was the Safavid empire) used to come to blows in the same region.

Even before Islam, it seems there were the same problems when there was the Byzantines and the Sassanids. 

I don't know how useful it is to project past dynamics on the situation today? I'm not saying that they might not be entirely accurate and valid, but change and pragmatism on part of those involved wouldn't be any sort of big shocker. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

I don't know how useful it is to project past dynamics on the situation today? I'm not saying that they might not be entirely accurate and valid, but change and pragmatism on part of those involved wouldn't be any sort of big shocker. 

If there is one thing I have learnt is that history does tend to repeat itself and the geopolitics of the region have a much bigger impact than we realise.

One thing from my own observations is that Erdogan is very determined to undo the foundations of the modern Republic of Turkey set up by Ataturk. 

But he is doing the dismantling in a step by step process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Erdogan once said that democracy is like a tram ride. It's useful until you get off at the next stop.

The country is going towards a dictatorship and it will be an Islamic dictatorship. 

It seems he wants to re-create the Ottoman empire.

It'll be amusing to see what justifications certain parties begin to churn out when he starts a Soviet style cracking down on dissent; the whole political opposition / artists / minorities routine that become the victims of these type of regimes. The same people who cheered when the military coup was crushed last year will be wringing their hands in disbelief, asking why nobody is helping those oppressed Turks. Give it another 7 or so years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

It'll be amusing to see what justifications certain parties begin to churn out when he starts a Soviet style cracking down on dissent; the whole political opposition / artists / minorities routine that become the victims of these type of regimes. The same people who cheered when the military coup was crushed last year will be wringing their hands in disbelief, asking why nobody is helping those oppressed Turks. Give it another 7 or so years.

what do you mean start I thought he had already soon flavour last year by murdering dissenting army generals, journalists etc calling mobs to put down the soldiers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

It'll be amusing to see what justifications certain parties begin to churn out when he starts a Soviet style cracking down on dissent; the whole political opposition / artists / minorities routine that become the victims of these type of regimes. The same people who cheered when the military coup was crushed last year will be wringing their hands in disbelief, asking why nobody is helping those oppressed Turks. Give it another 7 or so years.

The urban/coastal Turks are the ones who tend to be anti-Erdogan.

Most of his support comes from the Anatolian heartlands. They are the more conservative religious types and would definitely be the ones cheering him on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use