Muslim upset Sikh cabbies giving free rides to Manchester victims?

[BhForce]

Sikh24 reported that Gurdwaras were opening their doors to Manchester jihadi attack victims, and also Sikh cabbies were giving free rides to victims. No biggie, right? Wrong. It seems that at least some Muslims and their sympathizers were upset at highlighting this fact.

Check out this tweet by a Sikh about Sikh cabbies giving free rides:

https://mobile.twitter.com/SinghLions/status/866930974369632256/photo/1

@dineshjoshi70 applauds @SinghLions and says:

Gurudwaras worldwide are messengers of humanity . So are the Sikhs    and so do some others.   But not Twitter user @ShazU_91. She asks why identify the religion of the good samaritans?: Quote "Sikh cab driver" couldn't just say he's offering lifts? Or just cab driver? ...goodness. https://mobile.twitter.com/ShazU_91/status/866937798686912512?p=p and: Quote Pisses me off that people start creating divisions like that. They aren't the first brown people to offer help for last night https://mobile.twitter.com/ShazU_91/status/866941338742378496?p=p Actually what really pisses off Miss ShazU_91 is that normal people appreciate Sikhs' warm and giving personalities and the fact that they are not bombing average British people, and people are figuring out the difference between Sikhs and Muslim, even people like Katie Hopkins in her latest article: Quote Let’s be honest and admit that none of these outrages has been committed by Sikhs or Hindus or Christians, though it is perfectly true that some members of the IRA who planted bombs over 20 years ago regarded themselves as devout Roman Catholics. It’s not a form of persecution, but a reflection of reality, to admit the presence of extremists in some Muslim communities. I repeat: such people are not usually found among Christians, Hindus or Sikhs. What Miss ShazU_91 wants is a united colored peoples front where whenever the latest Islamic terror attack occurs, everybody who isn't white (West Indians, Chinese and other orientals, aboriginals from various places, Indians including Sikhs, Pakistanis, middle-easterners, Africans, North Africans, Latinos, etc.) get lumped into a single category, and no further distinctions are made. And I don't think we should give her what she wants.

[BhForce]

Here are some other Twitter responses:

@manfaceUK	May 23
Replying to @SinghLions I'm from Huddersfield where all my life the Sikh community showed the same supportive community spirit and care, just like today ❤️

 

Leslie Grantham @LesGranthamReal

May 23

Replying to @SinghLions @thelouisemerick Well done sir.   #wengerout @simon_gooner May 23 Replying to @SinghLions @Dansullyafc Always found the Sikh community to be top notch! Well played   Star4WestBromWest @StarAnderton May 23 Replying to @SinghLions @SteveUnwin01 As ever the generosity of the Sikhs & decent humans beings in Manchester is there for those in need after this cowardly terrorist attack.   Here's one negative comment: Nuala Kitty Woulfe @NWoulfeWriter May 23 Replying to @SinghLions @CorkSeashell Seriously, I'd never say a Catholic cab driver or a Protestant.. you don't need to tell me his religion/spiritual beliefs...deceny is human   My response: Well, it's like this: you cannot tell a Catholic cabbie from a Protest taxi driver by merely glancing at him. You can with a Sikh in 21st century Britain. Secondly, Sikhs are very often mistaken by some people for Muslims. And that's why we constantly highlight Sikhs doing kind deeds so maybe we can save the life of some random, innocent Sikh.   Lastly, I'd like to say all the stuff that Sikhs do, like distributing langar in the community, and just general being-a-good-person, all that stuff does create positive karma which comes back and we get repaid by the Law of Karma.

[MisterrSingh]

Further proof that the western liberal media are no friends of Sikhs:

Cosmo knowingly and deliberately removed reference to the fact that the taxi driver offering free lifts was a Sikh, in order to push their 'Not All Muslims' narrative. The journalist knew the guy was a Sikh. It was there in the original tweet that was edited. 

These people are not on our side.

[genie]

50 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Further proof that the western liberal media are no friends of Sikhs:

Cosmo knowingly and deliberately removed reference to the fact that the taxi driver offering free lifts was a Sikh, in order to push their 'Not All Muslims' narrative. The journalist knew the guy was a Sikh. It was there in the original tweet that was edited. 

These people are not on our side.

The far right wing white media are not on our side either they are only on our side when it suits their interests and narrative. If you check the Canadian jewish owned "rebel media" on youtube they have created negative stories on Sikhs, hindus and other ethnic minorities and only show positive stories on Sikhs when they want to differentiate Sikhs from muslims. Having said that the british far right white media tends to be very pro-Sikh and I've not seen them put any negative stories on Sikhs out before its only the canadian and american far right white/jewish media that does that.

There are some on the liberal left side of politics who are friends of Sikhs and do know the problem is solely down to Islam because islam is a far right fascist ideology.

And there are those on the far left liberal spectrum who are covertly racist because they lump all asian/brown people all religious or ethnic minorities in one box thinking we all think the same we all have same ideologies and same values and outlooks in life when we dont. These far left m0rons dont want to acknowledged islam's ideological goal of taking over lands and populations to make everyone submit to its religion.

These far left lot actually do more harm than good by defending islam when they should be singling it out and calling it out when atrocities are commits in its name or by its adherents using islamic texts. They are shielding and letting the problem carry on instead of rooting out the extremist narrated ideology and extremists within the muslim community.

[BhForce]

The reasons I believe @ShazU_91 is Muslim are that her profile pic shows her to be an "Asian" looking person,

Google images shows more such pics, and links from a Google search for ShazU_91 show various pages where the location is indicated as Pakistan, including a Pakistani cars discussion forum. Additionally, there's this tweet:

Shaz ? @ShazU_91	8 May 14
Replying to @l3ahpar @l3ahpar as a born muslim, I've stopped caring. Still don't eat pork but not arsed about halal or not.   Shaz ? @ShazU_91 9 Mar 15 Replying to @CaliBesteen @HipsterAllah rather be Muslim than a Hindu ?   Quite interesting how even non-practicing Muslims are so very nationalistic or Islamist.

[BhForce]

1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

Further proof that the western liberal media are no friends of Sikhs:

Cosmo knowingly and deliberately removed reference to the fact that the taxi driver offering free lifts was a Sikh, in order to push their 'Not All Muslims' narrative. The journalist knew the guy was a Sikh. It was there in the original tweet that was edited. 

These people are not on our side.

Liked.
Amazing how "journalists" feel free to just brazenly lie about people who they don't happen to favor.

[BhForce]

Btw, Miss ShazU_91 is upset that Katie Hopkins' kids don't want to die in a bomb blast:

Shaz  ?‏ @ShazU_91  May 23

Shaz  ?Retweeted Katie Hopkins

Maybe you need to let your kids be kids then. Horse face c*nt

Shaz  ?added,

Katie HopkinsVerified account @KTHopkins

My children say they would rather be shot than die slowly by nail bomb. This is the UK today. #ManchesterArena

0 replies1 retweet4 likes

 

 

May I point out that most people would prefer a quick death to bleeding out slowly and painfully? ShazU is upset that somebody wouldn't want to be the recipient of one of her radical Islamist brothers' nail bombs.

 

Amazing how hard-core non-practicing Muslims can be. It seems to me that most of our non-practicing Sikh girls would never stand up for Sikh issues like Miss ShazU_91. Can anyone explain this?
 

[MisterrSingh]

4 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Liked.
Amazing how "journalists" feel free to just brazenly lie about people who they don't happen to favor.

Journalism died a very long time ago. Now it's just sponsored corporate or state propaganda. 

 

18 minutes ago, genie said:

The far right wing white media are not on our side either they are only on our side when it suits their interests and narrative. If you check the Canadian jewish owned "rebel media" on youtube they have created negative stories on Sikhs, hindus and other ethnic minorities and only show positive stories on Sikhs when they want to differentiate Sikhs from muslims. Having said that the british far right white media tends to be very pro-Sikh and I've not seen them put any negative stories on Sikhs out before its only the canadian and american far right white/jewish media that does that.

Yes, without a doubt. I've always believed we, as Sikhs, are in a unfortunately unique position whereby the racist Right are as much a threat to us as the apparently cordial-but-not-really Left. Neither have our interests at heart, yet Sikhs gravitate towards to the harmless liberal side because of the belief that their doctrine aligns with aspects of our forgiving and tolerant teachings, which they do in some ways but not in the ways they'd like to believe.

[BhForce]

21 minutes ago, genie said:

If you check the Canadian jewish owned "rebel media" on youtube they have created negative stories on Sikhs, hindus and other ethnic minorities

Do you have any Youtube links for this? Or keywords or journalist names?

I think it's quite tough getting Canadian media personalities on our side just because of the whole Air India tragedy. Of course, it's difficult to know the truth because the CSIS destroyed the evidence. Very convenient.

Not all Rebel Media personalities are anti-Sikh. For example, here's Gavin McInnes being interviewed by talkshow host Alex Jones:

Gavin McInnes says Sikhs are people who fought against Islam. Against oppression.
Their raison d'etre is helping the oppressed. Totally compatible with the West. Host Alex Jones then agrees and says yes, we don't care if you have brown skin.

[MisterrSingh]

Be careful of the likes of Alex Jones and his mates. They're into loopy conspiracy theories. Whilst there might be an unimaginable, all-encompassing conspiracy at play behind the scenes, unfortunately the average man and woman can only operate in an environment that deals with provable facts, even if those facts have been compromised. I'm not suggesting the likes of Jones don't present nuggets of truth here and there, but Sikhs should always seek the uncomfortable, unfiltered truth regardless of affiliations and biases, and not the Chinese Whispers version of the truth from parties with vested interests. Be confident in yourselves as individuals and thinking entities, so that you don't feel to compelled to hitch your wagon to a cause or a particular side that presents elements of reality and truth in amongst a whole host of falsehoods.