Jump to content

Sikh king for Britain


Dsinghd
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

So you advocate a monarchy as opposed to a democracy 

in the case of indian parliament, absolutely. But remember, there we had monarchies as opposed to a monarchy.

Or how about a mixed system, democracy and monarchy as well? The way it was before India did the act for disabling the monarchies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WRONG! How would we feel if someone claimed "White King for Punjab!" Oh yeah! Pehla Punjab da smbaal-lo. Let's leave rulers in countries they rightfully belong. ONLY white should be king/ Prime minister in Britain. ONLY Sikhs should rule in Punjab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Whilst this article was published in the daily mail it throws open some very interesting questions.. 

However it goes off the basic issues for me.. 

Firstly why is there a need for a Sikh king? 

Secondly Maharaja Ranjit Singh wasn't the only Sikh king just arguably the one who had the most success if we measure success by conquests of land.. 

Thirdly sikhi essentially promotes a Republican model of governance which is radical to the extreme where power is devolved to the Sangat.. But none has the power or right to coerce another.. 

In many ways it promotes a social system which resembles those which we may today call  'anarchist'. Devolved, local confederations, without a  legalistic structure.. One under which people have total freedom of existence to live and practice their beliefs as they choose with intervention only being sanctioned if oppression and exploitation  is found.. 

if it was true he would have germanic blood but he didn't ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ipledgeblue said:

in the case of indian parliament, absolutely. But remember, there we had monarchies as opposed to a monarchy.

Or how about a mixed system, democracy and monarchy as well? The way it was before India did the act for disabling the monarchies.

A contradiction in terms no such thing as a monarchy and democracy. You seem to be mixing up political systems.. 

Moreover are you talking about the dismantling of the Indian state as opposed to the secession of the panjab and its independence 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

duleep was married to a germanic lady illegimate daughter of a german Muller and a woman from abyssinia and his sons too were married to christians . 

This is nonsensical.. I believe the article however farfetched suggests that this man is descended from a illegitimate bloodline of duleep Singh  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use