Jump to content

Was Ravan responsible for conflict with Sri Raam !


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, puzzled said:

It was Ravans sister who was a ogre that was responsible for it. She saw Raam and got really kaami and asked him to marry her, Raam was already married so refused the proposal, plus she was a ogre and probably looked like Shrek. She then got angry and started attacking Sita so Lakshman cut her nose off lol!  She then ran back to her brother squealing and Ravan decided to punish Raam by kidnapping Sita. The only reason Ravan didn't forcefully have a physical relationship with Sita was because in the past Ravan had raped many women, one of the ladies he raped went running to Bramha and Brahma said to Ravan that if he has s3x with a woman without her consent then he will immediately die. Ravan then tried tricking Sita by taking on Raams form etc but nothing worked.

But regardless, Ravan was a tyrant, he was taxing Brahmins, harassing meditating rishis/yogis and treating his subjects really badly and whenever a tyrant like that gained too much power a Avtar came down to earth to slay the tyrant. The whole Sita incident was just a excuse ...    

Makes you wonder why the tyrants of today are not being slayed and roaming freely, perhaps because its Kalyug ? ...  

 

Where u getting all this info ? What source you have most of the Kathavachak I listen to say he was good guy just got stuck with ego at the end but never touched any lady he even respected Sita was waiting from Sri ram chandra so could get revenge 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sometimes feel we take the opposing view on raavan to just irritate north indian hindus. No doubt there is a tradition in the south of viewing history differently than the north in terms of Raam and Raavan, but the current trend amongst our community to sort of belittle Raam Chandar is misplaced.  Raavan is linked to the fatal flaw of ego. Whatever shortcomings might be there in Raam Chandars life, it is completely eclipsed by the fact that he was the Treta Avataar, sent to end a tyrants reign.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Pallav2015 said:

Where u getting all this info ? What source you have most of the Kathavachak I listen to say he was good guy just got stuck with ego at the end but never touched any lady he even respected Sita was waiting from Sri ram chandra so could get revenge 

Got it from Valmiki Ramayan. I have never heard a kathavachak call Ravan the good guy! Not quite sure how a individual that kidnapped another mans wife can be called the "good guy" 

Dasam bani says that of you go with another mans wife then you will die the death of a dog, and look how Ravan died ... 

Ravan was a tyrant king, the whole reason Raam came down to earth was to destroy Ravan. Just how the Man/Lion avtar came down to destroy Prahlads father and how Krishna came to destroy Kans and other tyrants. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use