Jump to content

Singh's finding it hard to find life partners.


Guest Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 3/8/2019 at 7:12 PM, Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh said:

Bit excessive innit ??

What percentage did you say 'no' to and how many said 'no' to you ?

 

My kids are only little but if, when they grow up. they decide to go though this traditional method I will give them this one sound advice when it comes to these introductions to girls at people's houses:

  • When the girl walks in to the room does she plod or does she glide ? The one that glides is the one.
  • At your one to one chat with her and you ask her what she thinks look out for the one says she's happy but is happy with what her elders say. She's the one.

What mean plod and glide ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/8/2019 at 2:22 PM, puzzled said:

 Note how a lot of the Punjabi women married to white men are normally not that pretty or dark skinned or in their 30s!  

Two examples 

https://www.justgiving.com/fundraising/geeta-sidhu-robb ; https://www.standard.co.uk/news/how-mother-built-her-life-up-again-from-ruin-to-riches-6852084.html

b773b24f-16e3-4ca9-85b4-eee3a2e67c7e.jpg?template=FundraisingPageHeroImageM

 

Star.PNG

 

Image result for tina daheley

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcthree/2011/10/cv-tina-daheley.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Premi5 said:

The likes of Geeta Sidhu left her husband after the fortune was lost. 

What a wonderful woman! 

Tina Daheley is in the media. Her social circle is middle class goreh. 

What you guys have to realise is that woman marry up.(The term is called hypergamy )

These types of woman will not consider a man of their own ethnicity as it would be beneath them.

Marrying a gorah is an upgrade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

Do you think all the white women who have kids with black men in the UK consider it marrying/'parenting' up?

The majority of white women who have kids with black guys in the UK are not marrying them.

These type of white women are predominantly on welfare.

Women have a dual sexual strategy

:to have a kid with the most alpha male that they can find

:to have someone to provide for them.

Some women cannot find these two strategies in one man.

In the case of these type of white women, their provisioner is big daddy government. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

The majority of white women who have kids with black guys in the UK are not marrying them.

These type of white women are predominantly on welfare.

Women have a dual sexual strategy

:to have a kid with the most alpha male that they can find

:to have someone to provide for them.

Some women cannot find these two strategies in one man.

In the case of these type of white women, their provisioner is big daddy government. 

 

Nowadays I'm seeing that some women like to sort of collect children of different hues. I see some gorian with a white kid, an obviously half black one....and sometimes they are eyeing you up in the supermarket like they want to add a half brown one to the collection....lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/6/2019 at 11:44 PM, Guest Amritdhari said:

So what will happen to all the Amritdhari Singhs in Punjab the future?

They are already more of them than corresponding women. Gender ratio in Punjab on top of that making things worse!

Then on top of that more females going abroad to study and marrying NRI's.

Meaning that no way can all Amritdhari Singh's in Punjab find local Amritdhari women!

Solutions:

1. We need to stop hating on Gursikhs marrying non-Amritdhari or non-Punjabi women!

2. We should stop assuming that the Khalsa Panth will die out because of non-Amritdhari spouses or non-Punjabi's!

(If someone is so weak that a spouse weakens their commitment to Sikhi then they clearly had weak commitment to begin with)

Especially when Muslim men and groomers who marry non-Muslim women all retain 100% loyalty to Islam in 99% of cases!

 

And what about the lack of Sikh men that all the west Sikh guys getting married to goriah or going back to Punjab create too.

On 3/8/2019 at 2:22 PM, puzzled said:

Note how a lot of the Punjabi women married to white men are normally not that pretty or dark skinned or in their 30s!  Women get it hard too

I really don't understand this impression that some people create that there are 1000s of singhs queing up struggling to get married. 

It's like every singh is dying unmarried 

I really p1sses me off when some singhs pull out the victim card for everything!  It's like they view everything in a negative way 

Punjabi's have an inferiority complex (self-internalised racism) when it comes to dark skin. Gorah skin color is considered inferior to dark-skinned Indians. And that's despite that being in opposition to Gurmat with the Punj Piare being from South India, Gujarat, Orissa etc where folks are pretty dark and most of the Khalsa Panth being very dark skinned in comparison to goreh.

So when some dark skinned girls are shunned by their own community in the West, why do we scratch our heads as to why they are marrrying goreh who think of dark skin as "exotic" instead of inferior.

All Singhs are not dying unmarried but at least 20% of Sikhs born in the West must be struggling to get married in their 30's and 40's.

I think it's Sikh guys struggling most in Punjab but in the west I'd say it is women struggling most due to so many guys marrying goriah or going back to Punjab. But Amritdhari Singhs are probably an exception in the West as there are more of them compared to Amritdhari Singhnian. And if Amritdhari's restrict themselves of their own accord then it's a demographic recipe for disaster. 

So all in all we need to quit hating on our own people and stop hating dark skin but still be accepting of mixed background couples so long as everybody regardless of who they marry realises the vital importance of connecting all children to Sikhi and the community.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Premi5 said:

Those women aren't even attractive in indian standards let a lone Punjabi standards. They don't even remotely look Punjabi!   But that's what a lot of Punjabi women married to white men look like! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use