Jump to content

Dealing with people who try to judge your rehat?


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Somebody is confused by every post I make lol.  What is confusing about the above two posts confused people?

Since there is no dislike rating, people use the confused one.

It usually means you have caught the attention of someone who disapproves of your posts (or you). An opponent lol.

Good song btw. Bit controversial though, wonder what the IRA have to say about her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, MrDoaba said:

Since there is no dislike rating, people use the confused one.

It usually means you have caught the attention of someone who disapproves of your posts (or you). An opponent lol.

Good song btw. Bit controversial though, wonder what the IRA have to say about her.

I think they would first cry over the fallen children of Ireland.

I think they would appreciate the homage to their fallen brothers who died for the cause. 

The call to end the violence though, will fall on deaf ears in the IRA until Ireland is unified.


Éire go Brách

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

I think they would first cry over the fallen children of Ireland.

I think they would appreciate the homage to their fallen brothers who died for the cause. 

The call to end the violence though, will fall on deaf ears in the IRA until Ireland is unified.


Éire go Brách

True. The British did what they do best. They're teared apart Ireland. The Loyalists were backed by the government. Although the IRA began to do some questionable things, I cannot fault them overall.

Tiocfaidh ár lá!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MrDoaba said:

True. The British did what they do best. They're teared apart Ireland. The Loyalists were backed by the government. Although the IRA began to do some questionable things, I cannot fault them overall.

Tiocfaidh ár lá!

They definitely did some questionable things.  One they turned to crime, victimizing fellow Irish, to support the movement.  And two they started to target British civilians with terror attacks. 

My family's involvement pre-dated the bomb use.  They were snipers, which is a much cleaner way of fighting, due to the reduced collateral damage.  My family never supported bombings, but it didn't seem to strike home for the British until then.

It makes me less judgmental of other cultures that resort to terrorism.  As much as I don't support those type of means to an end, I always ask myself why does this person feel they must? 

Despite our history supporting the movement, any time a bombing would make the news my grandmother would cry and tell me that wasn't our way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

They definitely did some questionable things.  One they turned to crime, victimizing fellow Irish, to support the movement.  And two they started to target British civilians with terror attacks. 

My family's involvement pre-dated the bomb use.  They were snipers, which is a much cleaner way of fighting, due to the reduced collateral damage.  My family never supported bombings, but it didn't seem to strike home for the British until then.

It makes me less judgmental of other cultures that resort to terrorism.  As much as I don't support those type of means to an end, I always ask myself why does this person feel they must? 

I have spoken to a couple of Irishmen in the past and the majority or Irish folk, according to them, do not support the IRA at all and many would rather not remember the days of the Army. But support for the Unification of Ireland still has strong support.

Woah so your kin were IRA? Is that what inspired you to join the military? And well it hit home for the British because they did nearly off the PM at the time. She was, and is, despised by many Brits.

With the exception of islamic terrorism, the word in itself must be used in context. Today it's used liberally to simply malign a cause which interferes with an agenda. Any act of violence is labeled terrorism without any consideration of the intentions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MrDoaba said:

I have spoken to a couple of Irishmen in the past and the majority or Irish folk, according to them, do not support the IRA at all and many would rather not remember the days of the Army. But support for the Unification of Ireland still has strong support.

Woah so your kin were IRA? Is that what inspired you to join the military? And well it hit home for the British because they did nearly off the PM at the time. She was, and is, despised by many Brits.

With the exception of islamic terrorism, the word in itself must be used in context. Today it's used liberally to simply malign a cause which interferes with an agenda. Any act of violence is labeled terrorism without any consideration of the intentions.

As the purity of the IRA movement declined the support for it declined as well.  Also, since protestants and catholics have made peace under the Republics flag it makes it unsavory to talk about. 

I use the term IRA loosely, which isn't really the most accurate way to speak about the various forms of resistance, but it's the easiest way to get the idea across to people.

My kin have a history of fighting against the British that goes back 700+ years, my family's involvement ended in about 1900, so we actually never were involved the IRA, but it's historical predecessors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use