Jump to content

Was the Indira Gandhi assassination a staged psy-op? Did she fake her death?


Guest Jas S Virdee
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Jas S Virdee

This may seem controversial but having studied the JFK assassination there are a lot of striking similarities . If you are not aware of this, there is a lot of compelling information that the JFK assassination was staged psyop. 

http://mileswmathis.com/barindex2.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/user/dallasgoldbug/videos 

Like other staged events, there are many conflicting reports and not one individual actually saw the assassination. Witness accounts are all directly before and directly after the event which is a red flag in itself. One of the most compelling points is how Peter Ustinov the  MI6 operative was with Indira in days before her death and was scheduled to interview her on the day of her 'death'. 

There is a case that her alleged assassination was planned and pre-meditated and was necessary in the grand plan that they had devised. Please listen to her last speech and how strange it is that she is talking as if she already knows what will happen to her. Also look at the TIME magazine front cover in Nov 1984. It all makes perfect sense. We all know what followed the event and how the anti-sikh-riots were orchestrated from the top. So why should Indira's death be any different? Surely the assassination had to be planned from within for them to organize, mobilize and execute the genocide that followed and make it look spontaneous. 

I hope there are people out there who can relate to what i am getting at and i'd like to hear from you. For everyone else who isn't familiar with this please look up the strategies of Intelligence and psychological operations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Guest Jas S Virdee said:

This may seem controversial but having studied the JFK assassination there are a lot of striking similarities . If you are not aware of this, there is a lot of compelling information that the JFK assassination was staged psyop. 

http://mileswmathis.com/barindex2.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/user/dallasgoldbug/videos 

Like other staged events, there are many conflicting reports and not one individual actually saw the assassination. Witness accounts are all directly before and directly after the event which is a red flag in itself. One of the most compelling points is how Peter Ustinov the  MI6 operative was with Indira in days before her death and was scheduled to interview her on the day of her 'death'. 

There is a case that her alleged assassination was planned and pre-meditated and was necessary in the grand plan that they had devised. Please listen to her last speech and how strange it is that she is talking as if she already knows what will happen to her. Also look at the TIME magazine front cover in Nov 1984. It all makes perfect sense. We all know what followed the event and how the anti-sikh-riots were orchestrated from the top. So why should Indira's death be any different? Surely the assassination had to be planned from within for them to organize, mobilize and execute the genocide that followed and make it look spontaneous. 

I hope there are people out there who can relate to what i am getting at and i'd like to hear from you. For everyone else who isn't familiar with this please look up the strategies of Intelligence and psychological operations. 

she had planned to martyr herself to catapult her lame duck second son's political career , I suspect she had cancer so didn't care for living rather preferring to live on  as a legend 'mother India' 'durga' etc etc . She knew that the sikhs will not let it stand unavenged from history and as the female cousins of those faujis told sikh families in Gravesend , they had been in enforced barrack stay , for two weeks during the op Blue Star , woodrose etc before being allowed to go home and find out what happened . When they returned they were surprised that they were put on duty . she died  that was true ...but the motives were not out in the open .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jas S Virdee

 

12 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

she had planned to martyr herself to catapult her lame duck second son's political career , I suspect she had cancer so didn't care for living rather preferring to live on  as a legend 'mother India' 'durga' etc etc . She knew that the sikhs will not let it stand unavenged from history and as the female cousins of those faujis told sikh families in Gravesend , they had been in enforced barrack stay , for two weeks during the op Blue Star , woodrose etc before being allowed to go home and find out what happened . When they returned they were surprised that they were put on duty . she died  that was true ...but the motives were not out in the open .

 

Do you know that history is full of psy-ops on Halloween day? That's one of their favourite days to pull off a staged event/death hoax. E.g  http://mileswmathis.com/river.pdf

What evidence do we have that she died on 31 Oct 1984? 

1.A few witness reports who didn't actually see the event? Read them there are loopholes everywhere.

2.An artist's painting that shows her getting shot? Where are the photographs of her at the scene/in the immediate aftermath or even in the hospital?

3. Because the media said so?

There are so many points to consider and please do not cite that her body was at the funeral as evidence that she was assassinated, because that is just a presumption as i will expound below...

Firstly take a look at the funeral video. Look at Rajiv's face and body language? Anything odd there?

Also we can clearly see the face of Indira in the coffin. Does it look like a 4 day old corpse? I have seen dead bodies and been to morgues regularly. In my opinion it looks like a wax sculpture like in Madame Tussaud's. Look at the eyelids, they are not natural at all and are the hardest thing to look real in wax work. it looks artificial and manufactured. They did a poor job.

If you think this is beyond the realm of possibility know that people have been  doing this for centuries! Tussaud's first wax sculpture being in 1777. 

Take a look at things with an open mind. 

Do you actually think that she would choose to die given the same results could be achieved if her death was staged???

This is Indira we are talking about. The elite don't kill their own. History is written by those that are in power. You are just meant to lap it up and believe it all like sheep.

Denial is the first stage of the grieving process, since we have been lied to our whole lives. So I can understand some of your reactions.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Guest Jas S Virdee said:

 

 

Do you know that history is full of psy-ops on Halloween day? That's one of their favourite days to pull off a staged event/death hoax. E.g  http://mileswmathis.com/river.pdf

What evidence do we have that she died on 31 Oct 1984? 

1.A few witness reports who didn't actually see the event? Read them there are loopholes everywhere.

2.An artist's painting that shows her getting shot? Where are the photographs of her at the scene/in the immediate aftermath or even in the hospital?

3. Because the media said so?

There are so many points to consider and please do not cite that her body was at the funeral as evidence that she was assassinated, because that is just a presumption as i will expound below...

Firstly take a look at the funeral video. Look at Rajiv's face and body language? Anything odd there?

Also we can clearly see the face of Indira in the coffin. Does it look like a 4 day old corpse? I have seen dead bodies and been to morgues regularly. In my opinion it looks like a wax sculpture like in Madame Tussaud's. Look at the eyelids, they are not natural at all and are the hardest thing to look real in wax work. it looks artificial and manufactured. They did a poor job.

If you think this is beyond the realm of possibility know that people have been  doing this for centuries! Tussaud's first wax sculpture being in 1777. 

Take a look at things with an open mind. 

Do you actually think that she would choose to die given the same results could be achieved if her death was staged???

This is Indira we are talking about. The elite don't kill their own. History is written by those that are in power. You are just meant to lap it up and believe it all like sheep.

Denial is the first stage of the grieving process, since we have been lied to our whole lives. So I can understand some of your reactions.

 

yes her corpse looks like a four day corpse , my cousin and my father were looking similar(she after seven days cancer death , Dad seven days natural cause) , the skin does start looking waxy because of the draining away of blood from the tissue by effect of gravity.

 

I watched her body intently on the pyre and it didn't melt like oil based wax ... it burned like our children and that monk

the elite kill and frame their own if they have served their purpose ...they are cold blooded like that .

Indira was a meglomaniac controlled by her handlers , that is why under her watch she opened up India to the external corporations ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest michigan
16 minutes ago, monatosingh said:

Even if it was fake, then are the people who assassinated her even Shaheeds?

 

Exactly. I asked myself this too......

but your missing an important point. If it was faked then were they actually killed?

If they were in on it and the whole event was staged then we have been fooled for decades..........

but if they had no idea and were really killed on that day then they would be shaheeds since they died due to their religion. But no one has asked these questions. 

We need to look into this further rather than dismiss these things out of hand. I'm gonna do some research.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Guest michigan said:

Exactly. I asked myself this too......

but your missing an important point. If it was faked then were they actually killed?

If they were in on it and the whole event was staged then we have been fooled for decades..........

but if they had no idea and were really killed on that day then they would be shaheeds since they died due to their religion. But no one has asked these questions. 

We need to look into this further rather than dismiss these things out of hand. I'm gonna do some research.

Old-Google-Logo.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use