Jump to content

Ali dawah ambushes and trys to own tommy robinson gets himself and islam owned instead lol

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, singh598 said:

You post alot of anti Muslim views thus portraying your internal self.

Althoughlthough I agree with you on the stuff you say.

I think you should stop hate and improve your own spiritual life

Who can know what's in someone's inner mind?

Her perspective is something that is sorely needed in a kaum that has so many softies, and a welcome counterpoint to the Islamophile Sikh Katy Sian.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, superkaur said:

Not anti muslim I am anti-islam extremism there is a difference. And I am just giving the sangat relevant topics that concern our community. The more we learn about the tactics and news of those who want to harm our  communities the more we can can protect ourselves and the most vulnerable.

Would you rather continue being spiritual ostriches of 1947 and 1984 (with heads in the sand while the storm is coming ahead?) that most Sikhs are these days. Too soft too liberal too dismissive too ignorant of whats going on out there in the real world cos they dont live in a muslim dominated area of land. I say to the soft liberal politically correct Sikhs.... give it time the dark face of islam will be knocking on your door and life too to wake you up.

Maybe post the odd anti-hindu post too... Yano just to mix things up a little...

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

how about digging up info in full the nature of the 'royal' families and current politicos who call themselves sikh and their true colours for instance maharaja of Patiala took 15,000 men and joined forces with British against Sikh Army , his son was a drunkard, smoker and womaniserand grandson well you can see that mess


yes we need to, Maharaja Bhupinder Singh what a mess! Taking women from villages and hills etc. Big tiddy as well. Corruption comes all the way to current Patiala Maharaja "Captain" Congress Chief Minister.

And all the firanghi propaganda that seeped down from these kingdoms as well as to main punjab through christian missionary schools. The rest of the colonial jatha stuff we can't post on this forum, please look on alternate boards :) Past admins could ban you for writing against believing in firanghi god, even in private messages!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, S4NGH said:

Maybe post the odd anti-hindu post too... Yano just to mix things up a little...

wtf. This is exactly what donald trump warned us about! you're taking the jobs of other hard working forum members!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought that strap was a gatra at first tbh
    • Back in the days, women of Panjab wore either a Suthan style trouser (which could be loose or tight), a Ghagra or a Tehmat/Dhoti (mainly west Panjab). They wore a Kurti, which was shorter than the modern Kameez and if you go a bit back, some could be seen wearing a Choli too. Suthan style trousers eventually evolved into the modern salwar during the 1900s.  It would be nice to see women reviving these dresses again.  Typical dress of a Panjabi women from Amritsar 1875.   The Suthan looked like this. These photos range from the the 1870s to early 1900s.     The Ghagra was worn over trousers when heading outside, mainly by Sikh and Hindu women.  The Dhoti or Tehmat was mainly worn by Muslim Panjabi women from a certain area of west Panjab as Sikh women preferred a Ghagra. 
    • Paper seems glossy. And it seems in great condition for something so puratan.  I don't think back home are too hot on verification. More details would be great, but I'm not holding my breath.
    • Nah, he was jutt innit. Have to be 'bruin' innit. lol!  Plus, why miss a chance to prance around like a bandher! Who in their right mind would do that? You're not making sense.    Plus it was a low risk move in any case. Even if she blanked him, he could always go back to bhund maaring his synchronised bhangra 'brothers'.     
    • First, It is all in the hukam of Sri Akal Purakh sahib. Sikhs are never afraid of the numbers (there were days, where we were left just in thousands). Have we been focused on numbers, whole world would be amritdhari by now. So, that is not enough reason to allow multi-religious wedding where other faith teaching such as kafir ideology, my god is superior of all etc..  Second, if they are not sikh religious then why not get married in a church or court house? What tomorrow, you are going to raise the point that we are small in numbers and we may offend someone, so why not we simple remove the rule of covering head in hazzori of guru sahib. Where it will end? 
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use