Re-release of 'Nanak Shah Fakir' , chalked in for 13th April

[Akalifauj]

Why is there a rush to put this movie out?  The producer pulled the movie the first time as there was mistakes with it.  So the movie must go through a deep analysis again before releasing it.  Only makes sense to do so.  After all its on the only Guru who can carry the soul across.

Sri Guru Nanak dev ji is the only Guru of creation and anything that will be shown on a mass scale must be perfected to the last scene.  

This whole wacky idea of don't watch it if you find something offence is being ignorant.  Obviously the person making such statements doesn't care about presenting the true story of Sri Guru Nanak dev ji.  Maybe Kahn Singh nabha should have minded his own business after hindus were printing materials of how Sikhs are Hindus.  

Whats up with the title as well.  Gurbani says Sri Guru Nanak dev ji is Guru Nanak.  So why didn't the producer follow Gurbani on this simple task?  Seems like very little research was put into the movie.

[jkvlondon]

On 13/04/2018 at 2:38 AM, Akalifauj said:

Why is there a rush to put this movie out?  The producer pulled the movie the first time as there was mistakes with it.  So the movie must go through a deep analysis again before releasing it.  Only makes sense to do so.  After all its on the only Guru who can carry the soul across.

Sri Guru Nanak dev ji is the only Guru of creation and anything that will be shown on a mass scale must be perfected to the last scene.  

This whole wacky idea of don't watch it if you find something offence is being ignorant.  Obviously the person making such statements doesn't care about presenting the true story of Sri Guru Nanak dev ji.  Maybe Kahn Singh nabha should have minded his own business after hindus were printing materials of how Sikhs are Hindus.  

Whats up with the title as well.  Gurbani says Sri Guru Nanak dev ji is Guru Nanak.  So why didn't the producer follow Gurbani on this simple task?  Seems like very little research was put into the movie.

It's a slippery slope and the people who say it go we can fix the damage after are being totally naive and foolish , a film which diminishes and distorts Guru Nanak Dev Ji's message and status on purpose (since scriptwriters etc were employed, the producer)

 

Now Salman Khan and Ifhan Khan are going  to make another film about sikh history looks like it is about Komagata Maru ....so our ithihaas it being contextualised and monetised for lining bollywood pockets  yet again ... Do we really want non sikhs telling our history as they want to  rather than how it really was ?

[superdupersingh]

Lol this is such a joke. People are actually getting hyped up over a movie. Why don't you get hyped up over the real thing? Listen to Sri Nanak Prakash Katha. You won't regret it or get your mind messed up by a Bollywood production. 

http://www.gurmatveechar.com/audio.php?q=f&f=%2FKatha%2F02_Present_Day_Katha%2FGiani_Harbhajan_Singh_Dhudikey_(Vidyarthi_Sampardai_Bhindra)%2FSri_Gurpartap_Sooraj_Parkash_Granth%2FPatshahi_01_-_Sri_Guru_Nanak_Dev_Ji

[jkvlondon]

1 hour ago, superdupersingh said:

Lol this is such a joke. People are actually getting hyped up over a movie. Why don't you get hyped up over the real thing? Listen to Sri Nanak Prakash Katha. You won't regret it or get your mind messed up by a Bollywood production. 

http://www.gurmatveechar.com/audio.php?q=f&f=%2FKatha%2F02_Present_Day_Katha%2FGiani_Harbhajan_Singh_Dhudikey_(Vidyarthi_Sampardai_Bhindra)%2FSri_Gurpartap_Sooraj_Parkash_Granth%2FPatshahi_01_-_Sri_Guru_Nanak_Dev_Ji

don't you think Nindiya of your Guru ji is not something to stop ?

[TejS]

2 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

don't you think Nindiya of your Guru ji is not something to stop ?

The best way to stop this nindya would be to not go watch it. Let the movie crash and burn for disrespecting Sikhi. Hit them where it hurts, let it flop. And that is exactly what is happening, I read the movie is doing terribly and that is a good sign of our people's intelligence. The ignorant theaters will eventually remove the movie from their listings as it isn't bringing in any costumers.

[FreshMind13]

On 4/9/2018 at 8:35 PM, jkvlondon said:

Changing all manglacharan in Guru ji to one standard one

Please don't take this is a bad way, this had nothing to do with money.

This was done by demands from Sikh Scholars, literally most early Birhs from the 1700's have the Manglacharans on top.

There is a standard rule, the Manglacharan would be on the right side, while the raag + mahala would be on the left side (but still lower than the Manglacharan). If you look at very old saroops, you can see this system present.

Slowly it went away as more "artistic" birhs started being scribed.

Please don't bring in other un-releared issues pls.

[jkvlondon]

6 hours ago, FreshMind13 said:

Please don't take this is a bad way, this had nothing to do with money.

This was done by demands from Sikh Scholars, literally most early Birhs from the 1700's have the Manglacharans on top.

There is a standard rule, the Manglacharan would be on the right side, while the raag + mahala would be on the left side (but still lower than the Manglacharan). If you look at very old saroops, you can see this system present.

Slowly it went away as more "artistic" birhs started being scribed.

Please don't bring in other un-releared issues pls.

actually NO scholars would dare to request changing the wording of the existing Mangalacharan from those penned by Guru Sahiban themselves which is what happened , it was NOT about formatting issues of the script . . I am stating the issues that have been historically caught to illustrate the lack of sikhi in SGPC head honchos.

[BhForce]

20 hours ago, superdupersingh said:

Lol this is such a joke. People are actually getting hyped up over a movie.

Username checks out.

You clearly believe you're superior to us "normal" Sikhs.

How's the air on Mount Olympus?

[FreshMind13]

6 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

actually NO scholars would dare to request changing the wording of the existing Mangalacharan from those penned by Guru Sahiban themselves which is what happened , it was NOT about formatting issues of the script . . I am stating the issues that have been historically caught to illustrate the lack of sikhi in SGPC head honchos.

Yes, Guru Sahib penned them on top.

If you look at early Birhs of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, they all have them on top generally with the rule I had mentioned.

They were not mixed, bottomed, and centered how they are like current saroops and senchyia printed today by printers.

I don't care about the SGPC, but please don't call scholars like Bhai Randhir Singh (Scholar), Gyani Gyan Singh Ji Nihung, Nihang Naurang Singh (One who standarized Sarabloh Granth), Bhai Joginder Singh Vedanti, and Bhai Joginder Singh Talwara as lacking knowledge on Sikhi. They have spent more time studying Puratan Saroops than all of us.

[jkvlondon]

22 hours ago, FreshMind13 said:

Yes, Guru Sahib penned them on top.

If you look at early Birhs of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, they all have them on top generally with the rule I had mentioned.

They were not mixed, bottomed, and centered how they are like current saroops and senchyia printed today by printers.

I don't care about the SGPC, but please don't call scholars like Bhai Randhir Singh (Scholar), Gyani Gyan Singh Ji Nihung, Nihang Naurang Singh (One who standarized Sarabloh Granth), Bhai Joginder Singh Vedanti, and Bhai Joginder Singh Talwara as lacking knowledge on Sikhi. They have spent more time studying Puratan Saroops than all of us.

you are misunderstanding what I am saying SGPC changed the wording like Ram Rai to suit their agenda ...I never maligned mahapurakhs and have total respect for all those you mentioned. It wasn't about positioning which is also important  but the actual Gurbani