Jump to content
Guest q&a

Free-masonic 'Sikhs'

Recommended Posts

Guest q&a

What do you make of secret societies like freemasons? Can you be both sikh and freemason?

I have heard of many people being initiated and there are historical masonic lodges in Punjab running since East India Company times.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Guest q&a said:

What do you make of secret societies like freemasons? Can you be both sikh and freemason?

I have heard of many people being initiated and there are historical masonic lodges in Punjab running since East India Company times.

 

no  from Gurbani side you cannot serve two masters and For us Waheguru ji is our all in all . Freemason are the antithesis of sikhi they want to control, cheat the populace deny the Creator , sikhi doesn't ... just because India has this plague doesn't mean we need to join them. 

since when has anything that east india company and angrez done been better for our people ? The first thing they did was burn our books, kill our elders and warriors , gave control of our gurdwarey over to anti-sikh mahants and rob our treasuries

Punjab has been doing international trade since ancient times even sycthians came to Punjab to buy our goldsmiths products ...we don't need them

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

no  from Gurbani side you cannot serve two masters and For us Waheguru ji is our all in all . Freemason are the antithesis of sikhi they want to control, cheat the populace deny the Creator , sikhi doesn't ... just because India has this plague doesn't mean we need to join them. 

since when has anything that east india company and angrez done been better for our people ? The first thing they did was burn our books, kill our elders and warriors , gave control of our gurdwarey over to anti-sikh mahants and rob our treasuries

Punjab has been doing international trade since ancient times even sycthians came to Punjab to buy our goldsmiths products ...we don't need them

I don't think that's what OP means. He means societies like the Nine Unknown Men. Sort of like Gupt secrets that only they would be privy to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest London jwaan
5 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

no  from Gurbani side you cannot serve two masters and For us Waheguru ji is our all in all . Freemason are the antithesis of sikhi they want to control, cheat the populace deny the Creator , sikhi doesn't ... just because India has this plague doesn't mean we need to join them. 

since when has anything that east india company and angrez done been better for our people ? The first thing they did was burn our books, kill our elders and warriors , gave control of our gurdwarey over to anti-sikh mahants and rob our treasuries

Punjab has been doing international trade since ancient times even sycthians came to Punjab to buy our goldsmiths products ...we don't need them

Hold on. Masons dont have a "master" Ie another god that is worshiped. What they have is a requirement that you must believe in a God ie not atheist. It's not Christian aligned . so how is this the antithesis of sikhi and conflicting with gurbani?

Where exactly are they cheating and controlling the populace? What the heck are you on about? (Again)

Masons have been around centuries before east India company even existed, so this is a ridiculous statement to infer that masons are a legacy of that.

Be factual jkv. I have said it once and im saying it again. Otherwise, with these exaggerations and hyperbole youre effectively just a female version of jagsaw the notorious......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Guest London jwaan said:

Hold on. Masons dont have a "master" Ie another god that is worshiped. What they have is a requirement that you must believe in a God ie not atheist. It's not Christian aligned . so how is this the antithesis of sikhi and conflicting with gurbani?

Where exactly are they cheating and controlling the populace? What the heck are you on about? (Again)

Masons have been around centuries before east India company even existed, so this is a ridiculous statement to infer that masons are a legacy of that.

Be factual jkv. I have said it once and im saying it again. Otherwise, with these exaggerations and hyperbole youre effectively just a female version of jagsaw the notorious......

Placing the group above any faith, race,societal rules or common human ethics  and staying true to the group is another master in abstract form.

Being members of a secret society and using it to get the law of the land changed  or the enforcers to ignore your crimes is an extreme form of cheating . two secret Lodges were revealed in the houses of Parliment recently...for what reason were they needed don't remember any charity work emanating from them ? the oft repeated stories of child abuse in higher echelons of society being ignored by police and justice system from the early seventies until now  are examples . Protection of the perps e.g. Leon Brittan

despite all the claims of brotherhood , charity etc Freemasonery is a closed shop with many rituals ... for sikhs we have our own idea of brotherhood which is universal , charity not as daan but as sharing , nishkam good deeds, no secrecy, lawful , respectful, no belief of ritualism or reliance on dramas  . What's the draw ,the benefit for a sikh to go to freemasonry  ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

no  from Gurbani side you cannot serve two masters and For us Waheguru ji is our all in all . Freemason are the antithesis of sikhi they want to control, cheat the populace deny the Creator , sikhi doesn't ... just because India has this plague doesn't mean we need to join them. 

Would you also object to something like the Lions Club? Unlike the Freemasons, the Lions don't use strange symbolism, their origins are not lost to the mists of time (Lions was created in 1916 in Illinois), they don't have secret handshakes or rituals, and they are meant just to be a social service organization, not a kind of substitute religion.

To the OP, I would say, instead of asking why a Sikh should not join Freemasons, I would ask, what's the need to join it in the first place? Just do your social service as a part of your local Gurdwara, or maybe donate to societies (Khalsa Aid, Sevapanthies) that are doing good work. Or join a non-secret social service organization.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Would you also object to something like the Lions Club? Unlike the Freemasons, the Lions don't use strange symbolism, their origins are not lost to the mists of time (Lions was created in 1916 in Illinois), they don't have secret handshakes or rituals, and they are meant just to be a social service organization, not a kind of substitute religion.

To the OP, I would say, instead of asking why a Sikh should not join Freemasons, I would ask, what's the need to join it in the first place? Just do your social service as a part of your local Gurdwara, or maybe donate to societies (Khalsa Aid, Sevapanthies) that are doing good work. Or join a non-secret social service organization.

my only experience of lions club was it attracted the local racial bigots  , which in the east end  was all the skins wannabes...don't know if it has cleaned up ....plenty of community projects to start help out with already  without needing to pay dues

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Guest London jwaan said:

Masons have been around centuries before east India company even existed, so this is a ridiculous statement to infer that masons are a legacy of that.

Yes, and that's plenty of time for weird stuff (philosophies/rituals/etc.) to accumulate. Why would a Sikh feel a need to be part of that?

When you say "be factual", it's a bit hard to be factual regarding a secret society. 

The Sikh panth is not a secret society because anybody can be present at any Gurdwara.

It is believed by many that Freemasons take a pledge to help their "brothers". This can have a debilitating impact on criminal and other investigations, and the process of lawmaking and governance. As regarding "facts", it's a fact that secret Freemason lodges were operating at Parliament.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/05/freemasons-masons

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/feb/04/two-freemasons-lodges-operating-secretly-at-westminster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest london jwaan
5 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Yes, and that's plenty of time for weird stuff (philosophies/rituals/etc.) to accumulate. Why would a Sikh feel a need to be part of that?

When you say "be factual", it's a bit hard to be factual regarding a secret society. 

The Sikh panth is not a secret society because anybody can be present at any Gurdwara.

It is believed by many that Freemasons take a pledge to help their "brothers". This can have a debilitating impact on criminal and other investigations, and the process of lawmaking and governance. As regarding "facts", it's a fact that secret Freemason lodges were operating at Parliament.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/05/freemasons-masons

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/feb/04/two-freemasons-lodges-operating-secretly-at-westminster

Well even if there is secrecy, "guessing" what goes on and presenting it as fact is a bit idiotic dont you think? I dont really know what goes on in the Brownies as its female only. Should I declare that they all meet up and torture male animals and eat raw fish heads and present it as fact?

No-one is denying that freemason lodges were operating in parliament. But is it a fact therefore that the majority of MPs were masons and therefore laws were set according to Masonic pledges with no regard for what is right for the country? or that because leon brittan was part of "higher society" that therefore he must have been a mason and thats why it was overlooked?

Unfortunately I think you too may be doing a few gusteean out of your jagsaw my friend....

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BhForce said:

Would you also object to something like the Lions Club? Unlike the Freemasons, the Lions don't use strange symbolism, their origins are not lost to the mists of time (Lions was created in 1916 in Illinois), they don't have secret handshakes or rituals, and they are meant just to be a social service organization, not a kind of substitute religion.

To the OP, I would say, instead of asking why a Sikh should not join Freemasons, I would ask, what's the need to join it in the first place? Just do your social service as a part of your local Gurdwara, or maybe donate to societies (Khalsa Aid, Sevapanthies) that are doing good work. Or join a non-secret social service organization.

What about societies like the 9 unknown men (providing they exist and aren't just rumors) there's surely some things within the panth that were kept gupt by some organisation for reasons unknown to the general. I mean Loh Prakash Granth was buried for aeons by the Rishis on the orders of Guru Sahib.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Kira said:

What about societies like the 9 unknown men (providing they exist and aren't just rumors) there's surely some things within the panth that were kept gupt by some organisation for reasons unknown to the general. I mean Loh Prakash Granth was buried for aeons by the Rishis on the orders of Guru Sahib.

buried ? held by the rishis to be given to Guru ji but once that was done , Guru ji entrusted gian to the khalsa and now the Khalsa have spread it further.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Guest london jwaan said:

Well even if there is secrecy, "guessing" what goes on and presenting it as fact is a bit idiotic dont you think?

The point is if they aren't up to no good, what's the reason for the secrecy?

If they they are not fully transparent, why in the world would a Sikh feel the need to join them?

And finally, why would you feel the need to defend them?

If it is conceded that outsiders don't know the full machinations of the Freemasons, can we then agree that Sikhs should not join them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest london jwaan
15 minutes ago, BhForce said:

The point is if they aren't up to no good, what's the reason for the secrecy?

If they they are not fully transparent, why in the world would a Sikh feel the need to join them?

And finally, why would you feel the need to defend them?

If it is conceded that outsiders don't know the full machinations of the Freemasons, can we then agree that Sikhs should not join them?

Just because something is secret that does not automatically mean someone is upto no good. That is an intellectually bankrupt conclusion. Your medical records are a secret between you and your doctor. Not even the police can access them without court permission. Because they are secret, does that automatically mean that youre a heroin addict?

Its not about why a sikh "feels the need". The point is, by joining them, a sikh is still a sikh. But saying that Im wasting my breath. JKV previously declared that maharajah ranjit singh was not a sikh and he wasnt even a mason, as far as we know"

Im not defending. Im challenging idiotic conclusions i.e. because they have their secrets, therefore they must be paedos for example.

And whether a sikh should join them or not, the lions club, rotary club or any other, provided they are not insulting sikhi, whats your problem with it? Being a sikh and a mason are mutually exclusive. One is not related to the other.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

buried ? held by the rishis to be given to Guru ji but once that was done , Guru ji entrusted gian to the khalsa and now the Khalsa have spread it further.

The Knowledge was still kept Gupt for 3 yugs, it came out eventually but they were tasked with a secret that later came out on the order of the Guru. My point still stands, it was originally buried so no one knew it even existed.

1 hour ago, BhForce said:

The point is if they aren't up to no good, what's the reason for the secrecy?

If they they are not fully transparent, why in the world would a Sikh feel the need to join them?

OP is referring to Sikh organisations that might exist. For all we know Guru Ji did start a secret group with a select task, He's done it before in Satyug (again Im not saying I know what the Guru is thinking, no one can do that. Only he knows but im hypothesising), in many cases these organisations might actually do some pretty important things. imagine a secret organisation with original manuscripts, told to always remain underground to guard them (every single document written by Guru Ji and his sikhs) would be instrumental in keeping certain parts of our heritage around in some shape of form, look at the state of things now. Dasam Granth is constantly attacked, we have people here who constantly deny historical events written in our books and choose to believe the tales of some modern day sunday sikh.

Quote

If it is conceded that outsiders don't know the full machinations of the Freemasons, can we then agree that Sikhs should not join them?

Dont get me wrong, im not saying Sikhs should join them. We definitely don't know enough about them but if a Sikh style organisation did emerge that was dedicated solely to issues relating to the Panth, it might actually be somewhat beneficial. Afterall there's alot of power in secrecy. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a freemason, but a close friend of mine is a past master of a lodge, they definitelty are involved in weird rituals. Not nefarious stuff but weird arti or whatever, not in sync with Gurbani. Mostly people join to enfranchise themselves and make business connections, like joining a fraternity. 

As far as secret Sikh societies I have no idea how you would find them or verify their secret info. 

I think other posters hit the mark by suggesting one join other humanitarian groups not steeped in mysticism. 

Gurbani is the best information out there.  

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nothing is easy unless something is done about it. We had only 200 cases and our PM enforced complete lockdown for 4 weeks. We have done 14 days already and have around 1000 cases and 1 death so far. These confirmed cases were projected to be 5000 now had the  lockdown not been in place. We do around 5000 cases a day which is very high per capita population of 5 million. One of my friend's wife in London got COVID 19, was send home after spending a week in hospital and my friend still has not been tested for the virus( he is diabetic too) SHOCKING.
    • They say when guru nanak dev ji and  bhai mardana used to be traveling through the jungles and start doing kirtan  even the animals used to come a listen.   
    • This was my nanas horse! Photo is from the 1950s    not sure which breed it is though    it was a female horse.   
    • bhai Rama Singh jee has written that in khalsa raj, even animals will be made to listen to Gurbani and eventually they will get salvation. In Guru Granth Sahib, kabir jee has written that dog of a Gurmukh is better than mother of a manmukh because the dog listens to Naam of its master. This means animals can listen to Naam /gurbani and get salvation.  
    • I don't like it when people treat animals bad.  It's sad when you see people in pain and suffering but for me iv always found the suffering of animals more upsetting.  I always have. The men in my mums side of the family used to keep indian bulls the white ones for racing. Mama used to raise and train them and then sell them. It was a shonkh.  He had one white bull called Saan! Saan was very well known and famed in the region. He won every race. Won so many races that my mama had a whole wall full of trophies. He made sooo much money in the races that my mamas daughters entire wedding was carried out by the money Saan won at the races   reception, dowry everything was paid by the money won at the races.  Used to win massive drums of ghee etc    he was famed throughout the whole region    gave my mama a lot of connections too lol      he then got old and my mama and nana decided not to send him to the races anymore.  But people used to still offer money for him    but they didnt sell him    he eventually died.  Loads of people after the bulls get old and cant race no more   people just sell them off or start making them work in the fields!   I dont understand how people can just sell animals just like that after they are of no use , how heartless and selfish is that      People who treat animals bad are just heartless and maha paapi  People can be just pure evil sometimes.  I dnt agree with these bull races though  I think they are cruel    iv been to a few and didnt like it at all 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use