Jump to content

How did Balbir Bazighar gain influence?


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, monatosingh said:

Is this true?!

This is shocking.

There are a whole load of Amritdhari's who eat meat either for medical reasons or because they are not as restricted to meat (Akal Takth Maryada).

Is there any proof that he said this?

Why is it shocking? Cause someone finally had the courage to stand up to those who abuse Amrit? what medical condition do you need meat for apart from greed? and not being funny, but any maryada that states you can eat meat is BS in my opnion. Fair enough if you like the singhs who were out in the jungles, but not if your like niddar going to aldi and buying cheap sausages

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Prokharkoo84 said:

Why is it shocking? Cause someone finally had the courage to stand up to those who abuse Amrit? what medical condition do you need meat for apart from greed? and not being funny, but any maryada that states you can eat meat is BS in my opnion. Fair enough if you like the singhs who were out in the jungles, but not if your like niddar going to aldi and buying cheap sausages

Do you think someone would be so short-minded to throw a fuss over what you eat?

If your Sikhi is based on viewing other people's diets, then that's where you place the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

I doubt the veracity of the fire thing for eating meat/drinking. 

Is it documented?

Wasn't Sant Ji reforming addicts etc and returning them to Sikhi?

 

 

Sant Ji did say that if you see anyone who is encouraged to molest a women, then do not spare them.

Sant Ji did say that if you see anyone who is bad mouthing the Guru, then do not spare them.

If Sant Ji did say burn anyone who eats meat and drinks, then isn't that inflicting Taksali views on other people? That's sort of changing the Sikh's maryada and forcing a Sikh to change their maryada because of the fact that they will get burnt due to eating meat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

I doubt the veracity of the fire thing for eating meat/drinking. 

Is it documented?

Wasn't Sant Ji reforming addicts etc and returning them to Sikhi?

 

 

yeah reforming people, not giving siropeh to those who claimed to be amritdhari, wore gurus bana and kakkar and did beadbi.

17 hours ago, TheeTurbanator said:

If Bhinranwale did in fact say to burn an Amritdhari simply for eating meat, then I would not consider him a Saint. 

There is a clear documented history of Sikhs eating meat. Meat itself is not “unholy” as the Taksali’s make it out to be. The ban is only on Halal meat. 

To burn someone simply for eating meat is stupid. 

PS: I’m vegetarian 

this aint a taksali issue, sant ji message was clear - if you seen anyone doing puteh kaam when in the roop of a gursikh wearing panj kakaar, then deal with them. funny how you pro meat jatha find so much dhukh in someone slating meat, tell me which ones of you are in the jungles being persecuted and starving? Let me guess... none of you. all you meat crew, how many of actually train? how many of you are pakkeh in your rehit? how much seva do you do? funny how you think by eating jhatka makes you a sikh, but doing the basics doesnt even come close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, TheeTurbanator said:

If Bhinranwale did in fact say to burn an Amritdhari simply for eating meat, then I would not consider him a Saint. 

There is a clear documented history of Sikhs eating meat. Meat itself is not “unholy” as the Taksali’s make it out to be. The ban is only on Halal meat. 

To burn someone simply for eating meat is stupid. 

PS: I’m vegetarian 

until you do 0.5% of what sant ji did, then decide if hes a sant. funny how you judge him, but anyone who cusses meat you got a sausage up your bondh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use