Journalist discovers there was no offical FIR or any punjab police historical documents held against Sant Bhindranwale

[genie]

Very strange that they would target and attack darbar sahib because of Sant Bhindranwale yet there was no crime at the time according to punjabi police he had alleged to have committed.

A First Information Report (FIR) is a written document prepared by police organizations in countries like Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan when they receive information about the commission of a cognisable offence, or in Singapore when the police receives information about any criminal offence.

 

[Guest]

Who would have filed the FIR in the first place though?

[genie]

1 hour ago, monatosingh said:

Who would have filed the FIR in the first place though?

Probably some dodgy politician or newspaper editor or right wing hindu extremists groups (e.g. ayra samajists/shiv sena punjab/hindu sanskriti,etc) and "sant nirankaris".

There was plenty of opportunity to do so as they were accusing him of all sorts yet under indian legislation of that time he had committed no crime. So question is how could the hindu extremist and the secular indian establishment then proceed to paint him as an anti-national khalistani terrorist. A murderer / a rapist / a destroyer of india and the worlds. But there was not a single charge sheet against him.

Any objective and fair minded Indian would and should have questioned why are they targeting him and what was the real game plan? But no, it seems he was used as an excuse to set a trap for Sikhs to get genocided in in their own holiest shrine. Arms were shipped in by the R&AW into darbar sahib. armed Indian state agents were infiltrating darbar sahib and vast numbers of the army deployed in Sikh majority state of punjab.

 

[Akalifauj]

9 hours ago, genie said:

 

Arms were shipped in by the R&AW into darbar sahib.

 

Shipped in for who and where did you get this baseless accusation from.  I think RAW is providing you this baseless information.

[genie]

6 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

Shipped in for who and where did you get this baseless accusation from.  I think RAW is providing you this baseless information.

You think huge numbers of arms just happened to be there at darbar sahib prior op blue star?

You think the Indian state did not monitor punjab heavily especially activity around darbar sahib during early 80s? You think the Indian state didnt want to give the public and the world an image that there are heavily armed "anti-nationalists" that only the might of the Indian army can take care of them and not the punjab police?

I personally saw video reports of coverage days prior operation blue star by ITN journalist showing truck load of Singhs and weapons heading towards darbar sahib and a police and army roadblock not stopping them. Why do you think that was? Surely if you want to prevent so called anti-nationalist/armed extremists/terrrorists you would stop and search for any arms coming into an area but they didnt stop nothing. Go figure

Go read some books, articles do some research then reply to very important topics like this.

[jkvlondon]

10 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

Shipped in for who and where did you get this baseless accusation from.  I think RAW is providing you this baseless information.

eyewitnesses who survived have spoken at length about the types of guns used and how they differed in number and class from the ones shown by the GOI on Doordarshan post-attack , same way truckloads of sikh manuscripts and literary heritage was shipped out , the parkarma and sarovar were cleared of the thousands of bodies of sikhs  that were tortured, raped and murdered in the three days after the attack and until the remainder were thrown in jails

[Akalifauj]

3 hours ago, genie said:

You think huge numbers of arms just happened to be there at darbar sahib prior op blue star?

You think the Indian state did not monitor punjab heavily especially activity around darbar sahib during early 80s? You think the Indian state didnt want to give the public and the world an image that there are heavily armed "anti-nationalists" that only the might of the Indian army can take care of them and not the punjab police?

I personally saw video reports of coverage days prior operation blue star by ITN journalist showing truck load of Singhs and weapons heading towards darbar sahib and a police and army roadblock not stopping them. Why do you think that was? Surely if you want to prevent so called anti-nationalist/armed extremists/terrrorists you would stop and search for any arms coming into an area but they didnt stop nothing. Go figure

Go read some books, articles do some research then reply to very important topics like this.

As I suspected.  You have no information and only accusations.  

[Akalifauj]

On 2018-04-07 at 5:51 AM, genie said:

You think huge numbers of arms just happened to be there at darbar sahib prior op blue star?

You think the Indian state did not monitor punjab heavily especially activity around darbar sahib during early 80s? You think the Indian state didnt want to give the public and the world an image that there are heavily armed "anti-nationalists" that only the might of the Indian army can take care of them and not the punjab police?

I personally saw video reports of coverage days prior operation blue star by ITN journalist showing truck load of Singhs and weapons heading towards darbar sahib and a police and army roadblock not stopping them. Why do you think that was? Surely if you want to prevent so called anti-nationalist/armed extremists/terrrorists you would stop and search for any arms coming into an area but they didnt stop nothing. Go figure

Go read some books, articles do some research then reply to very important topics like this.

If the Indian government was montitoring Sikhs very closely they would have known the secret paths into and out of Sri Akal Takht sahib.  

You have no evidence to say the weapons were provided by RAW.  

Weapons according to Singhs who were apart of the dharam yudh morcha was provided by Muslim sources in pakistan.  

Logically why would RAW provide weapons when RAW cut off all media from filming the attack on Sri Akal Takht sahib.  They could have planted the weapons very easily after the attack, if they wanted too as there was no media. This is not a democractic country who will not disturb the scene and take photos, and get investigation analysist to see what happened.  They shot first and destroyed Sri Akal Takht sahib as the world didn't see anything.  They created false statements and created stories.  The Singhs inside Sri Akal Takht sahib could have had a single pistol and RAW would have said they had thousands of weapons.