Jump to content

Punjabi Buddhists


Premi5
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 4/7/2018 at 3:49 PM, Premi5 said:

How many are there?

When I was at Uni, there was a British Indian with surname Chahal. 

He said his family was from Delhi, and they were all Buddhist

Hmm, Chahal is a Jat surname. Extremely strange to see a Jat as a Buddhist. They are usually Muslim, Hindu, and Sikh. Or maybe it was an Ambedkar follower who worked for a Chahal family and adopted the name when they had to get a passport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 4/13/2018 at 12:09 AM, BhForce said:

Hmm, Chahal is a Jat surname. Extremely strange to see a Jat as a Buddhist. They are usually Muslim, Hindu, and Sikh. Or maybe it was an Ambedkar follower who worked for a Chahal family and adopted the name when they had to get a passport.

I have no idea. He looked typical Panjabi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest GuestSingh

Used to know someone with the surname Randhawa and from a Sikh background whose dad then family converted to Buddhism so not easy to know just from surname. There must be more than we think but not too many, in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/24/2018 at 9:15 PM, GuestSingh said:

Used to know someone with the surname Randhawa and from a Sikh background whose dad then family converted to Buddhism so not easy to know just from surname. There must be more than we think but not too many, in my opinion.

I see. I think the exceedingly small number of Jatt, Ramgarhia, Khatri or other such Buddhists must be the overly educated rich Delhi/Mumbai dwelling-type who have never had the fortune of being exposed to the real Sikhi, and instead have the misimpression that Sikhi  is simply about swinging swords around or some such and there is no spirituality in it.

They are exposed to a whiff of spirituality from some Buddhist that they meet in the big city, and they think, "I've found it. Real spirituality. Never would have experienced this in the small-time provincial atmosphere of Punjab. I'm becoming a Buddhist."

Whereas if we had gotten off our butts and preached the real meaning of our faith, we wouldn't have this problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, BhForce said:

I see. I think the exceedingly small number of Jatt, Ramgarhia, Khatri or other such Buddhists must be the overly educated rich Delhi/Mumbai dwelling-type who have never had the fortune of being exposed to the real Sikhi, and instead have the misimpression that Sikhi  is simply about swinging swords around or some such and there is no spirituality in it.

They are exposed to a whiff of spirituality from some Buddhist that they meet in the big city, and they think, "I've found it. Real spirituality. Never would have experienced this in the small-time provincial atmosphere of Punjab. I'm becoming a Buddhist."

Whereas if we had gotten off our butts and preached the real meaning of our faith, we wouldn't have this problem.

You're right in someways. One of the biggest things in Sikhi is meditation and chanting the Waheguru mantra but I don't think even the majority of Sikhs know this. Sikhi is just seen as some 'warrior' religion that provides langar by a lot of people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I know why most Punjabi Buddhists are indeed Buddhists, well due to the fact of caste discrimination in our Sikhi. In Sikhism you would think we are advanced, but the issue is that culture is tangled up with Sikhi, and due to the promotion by the British that some certain castes were martial races this caused an Ego with certain Sikhs. As a result there was caste discrimination on our fellow Sikhs who, forgive me for saying it lower castes. Which is why Ambedkar wanted Buddhism, actually he was interested in our religion since we were against it, but he realized he would be a second class Sikh due to the fact of caste discrimination. If our fellow Sikh's would've actually followed the Guru Granth Sahib, and treated our fellows with respect, then perhaps Ambedkar would've been a Sardar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CanadianSingh said:

Us Sikh's don't believe in caste.

Well, yeah, but not in the way you replied to my statement. It is no more controversial to state that Chahal is a Jatt surname than to say that Anand is a Khatri surname or Smith is an English surname or O'Reilly is an Irish surname.

We don't "believe" in devtas, but that doesn't mean they don't exist. We just don't place our faith in them.

Similarly, we don't believe that any one racial group is inherently better than another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use