Jump to content

Why is there ritualism in Sikhism?


Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, guruvah said:

Because we are not attached to NAAM.

Anything devoid of NAAM is Maya. Simple.

Yes there are cautions every where in gurbani to rise above from human conditioning, wrapping our head around reference points, dualistic notions. Sukhmani sahib and Akaal ustat compositions comes in mind, where it clearly says without devotion of naam -dharam and karam are useless, so cautions are everywhere in gurbani to seekers not to confine themselves in only form-sargun /maya but see substratum ultimate principle behind all of this, seeing source of it and always remember -Aad purkh (Primal all pervading aware being) in midst of everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, guruvah said:

Because we are not attached to NAAM.

Anything devoid of NAAM is Maya. Simple.

Congrats guruvah. :clap:

For there can not be a more perfect reply than the one given by you.

Stay blessed.

Sat Sree Akal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CanadianSingh said:

Well, not going to lie, yeah, I do it as every other Sikh. I mean, we can bow down to anywhere we want in my opinion, I mean god is everywhere it's not in a certain direction, but everywhere. I mean when we bow down we gave humility or submission to god in a sense, but, yes I do bow down.

OK, thanks for the answer. Please also answer the question I gave above about if Guru Nanak Dev ji were to suddenly manifest in front of you (or you were to be transported to the 1500s) would you touch Guru Sahib's feet, matha tek, and wash Guru Sahib's feet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, guruvah said:
Quote

Why is there ritualism in Sikhism?

Because we are not attached to NAAM.

Anything devoid of NAAM is Maya. Simple.

Basically correct.

But it should be noted that Naam is granted by the Guru:

ਬਿਨੁ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਦਾਤਾ ਕੋ ਨਹੀ ਜੋ ਹਰਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਦੇਇ ਆਧਾਰੁ ॥

Bin Sathigur Dhaathaa Ko Nehee Jo Har Naam Dhaee Aadhhaar ||

Without the True Guru, there is no giver who can bestow the Support of the Lord's Name.

ਸਲੋਕ ਵਾਰਾਂ ਤੇ ਵਧੀਕ (ਮਃ ੩) (੩੫):੧ - ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ : ਅੰਗ ੧੪੧੭ ਪੰ. ੫ 
Salok Vaaraan and Vadheek Guru Amar Das

 

The very next line states that Naam is found via the grace of the Guru:

ਗੁਰ ਕਿਰਪਾ ਤੇ ਨਾਉ ਮਨਿ ਵਸੈ ਸਦਾ ਰਹੈ ਉਰਿ ਧਾਰਿ ॥

Gur Kirapaa Thae Naao Man Vasai Sadhaa Rehai Our Dhhaar ||

By Guru's Grace, the Name comes to dwell in the mind; keep it enshrined in your heart.

 

 

So how to get grace? Worship (puja) the Guru via loving devotion (bhagti).

So, some of the stuff the OP is talking about is not "ritualism", rather it is worship, which Gurbani says to do:

 

ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸੁਰੁ ਪੂਜੀਐ ਮਨਿ ਤਨਿ ਲਾਇ ਪਿਆਰੁ ॥

Gur Paramaesur Poojeeai Man Than Laae Piaar ||

Worship the Guru, the Transcendent Lord, with your mind and body attuned to love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CanadianSingh said:
12 minutes ago, BhForce said:

OK, thanks for the answer. Please also answer the question I gave above about if Guru Nanak Dev ji were to suddenly manifest in front of you (or you were to be transported to the 1500s) would you touch Guru Sahib's feet, matha tek, and wash Guru Sahib's feet?

Well, I guess no.

OK, so what part of that do you object to? 

If you're OK with matha teking to Guru Granth Sahib, I presume you would be OK with matha teking to Guru Nanak Dev ji.

But you object to touching Guru Sahib's feet with your hands? Afraid of germs, are we?

You would also object to washing Guru Sahib's feet? And this is based, again, on your own personal preferences?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BhForce said:

OK, so what part of that do you object to? 

If you're OK with matha teking to Guru Granth Sahib, I presume you would be OK with matha teking to Guru Nanak Dev ji.

But you object to touching Guru Sahib's feet with your hands? Afraid of germs, are we?

You would also object to washing Guru Sahib's feet? And this is based, again, on your own personal preferences?

No, I am not saying that, but I am just saying we should pay attention and pray to god, that's it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CanadianSingh said:
8 minutes ago, BhForce said:

OK, so what part of that do you object to? 

If you're OK with matha teking to Guru Granth Sahib, I presume you would be OK with matha teking to Guru Nanak Dev ji.

But you object to touching Guru Sahib's feet with your hands? Afraid of germs, are we?

You would also object to washing Guru Sahib's feet? And this is based, again, on your own personal preferences?

No, I am not saying that, but I am just saying we should pay attention and pray to god, that's it. 

Well of course we should pray to God.

But I'm trying to work out what you would do and not do. Just like you posted that you don't like bowing to pictures and I agreed with you. And you also posted you don't like that your father walks around Guru Granth Sahib. Posting what your position is allows us to have conversation.

So please just answer the questions, and tell us what you would do and what you wouldn't out of matha teking, touching feet, and washing feet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BhForce said:

Well of course we should pray to God.

But I'm trying to work out what you would do and not do. Just like you posted that you don't like bowing to pictures and I agreed with you. And you also posted you don't like that your father walks around Guru Granth Sahib. Posting what your position is allows us to have conversation.

So please just answer the questions, and tell us what you would do and what you wouldn't out of matha teking, touching feet, and washing feet.

I would only do Matha Tek to the Guru Granth Sahib, and thats it. I would only touch my elders feet as a sign of respect, I wouldn't touch any godmens or prophets who say they represent god. Infact god has no representatives, washing feet, I think its a sign of respect when you go into the Gurdwara.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use