Jump to content

Sikh Empire; Alternate History.


Recommended Posts

18th Century:

In this alternate history, I am starting after all the Sikh Misls had united under Maharaja Ranjit Singh. In this time line , Sikh Kings were not tolerant, any and all gaddars and enemies were killed without a thought. This Maharaja Ranjit Singh looked toward the future of the raj after his death and planned it so. The Maharaja did not invite anyone into the inner circle except strict Sikhs, aka Nihangs and those who had no alternate motivations except the far and wide rule of Sikh Fauj. In this scenario the king knew all about the dogra's trecherous nature, so he invaded and routed and slaughtered all dogras while annexing kashmir full into the sikh raj, rather than keeping it a vessle in the real time line. Further more, Sikhs were far more aggressive about converting all non sikhs into the khalsa fauj. People were given land and rewards when they converted and embraced khalsa. This way, Sikhs would've made up the majority of the empire  in a 100 yrs . Maharaja Ranjit Singh had started training his grandson Nau Nihal Singh to takeover his empire after his death in the future. So when the time came, Nihal would've been ready. In this time line , Sikh Empire is at it's peak and the maharaja is close to his death. But Nihal is fully ready to serve the Fauj. In this time line , the snakes never showed their heads since all faucets of the empire were made up of very sikh aspects. There was no terrible transition period between Rajit Singh's death and Nau Nihal's crowning. The british never saw a chance to strike , so they stayed at bay. 

 

Soon after taking over for his grandfather, Nau Nihal wanted to expand his rule, so he invaded Sindh and baluchistan , conquering both easily. The sikhs and british made further treaties into their allience and the british decided to hand  Haryana and Himachal to the Sikhs to show friendship. Meanwhile, the russians were looking to expand further down central asia and were looking to take Afganistan, the british decided to help sikhs Annex Afganistan , so russia never had a chance. Nau Nihal started his war against afgans, and with a rapidly industralizing Sikh Fauj and British weapons, the SIkhs easily defeated the very tribal and backwards afgans , this also led to the genocide of majority pathan population . Upwards of a million pathans were massacared by the Sikh army, though Sikhs didnt feel bad, as the afgans had slaughtered Sikhs in 17th century . Soon Sikhs had a huge landmass  for themselves, but they still weren't satisfied. The russians were coming, they wanted acess to the warm sea port into the indian ocean and didn't think the Sikhs couldn't defeat russian might. So the Sikh - Russo war started in 1893. Sikhs had been industrilizing since the start of 18th century and had much superior weapons and military system , that was developed with the help of the french and british. Sikhs easily defeated the russians and took over much of their central asian countries, uzbekistan, turkmenistan, parts of kazakstan were handed to the Sikhs and Europe took notice of this new superpower. 

 

19th Century

Sikhs expanded into africa, and made gains in Somalia and eritria . During WW1 , Sarkar I Khalsa sided with the brits  /allies but mostly stated out of the conflict, helping the allies with weapons / supplies and access through Sikh controlled areas.  However the Khalsa Fauj had it's own ambitions. Maharaja Ranjit the 2nd , son of Nau Nihal Singh wanted to take over tibet due to it's vast resources of mineral and plenty of fresh water. China itself was being destroyed by Japan and couldn't fight on two fronts and the Sikhs had a treaty with japan and so were able to annex Tibet. 

 

 WW2 , Sikhs again were friendly with brits / Allies and stayed mostly out of the war while protecting their african colonies . By 1940 , and the end of WW 2. Sikhs had grown to 100 million strong, made up majority in all the lands they controlled . Sikhism was now the 3rd largest religion after Christiany and islam, through the 19th and start of the 20th century , Sarkar - E - Khalsa stayed a monarchy, with the blood lines of the Original Maharaja Ranjit staying in power. Sikhs made out of WW2 with rich and with very few casulties, Sikhs never took part in battles in Europe and mainly just protected their assets. Sikhs had also loaned millions of dollars to the allies and very now the 3rd largest economy in the world by the end of WW2. With the end of Nazi empire , many nazi scientist were looking refuge outside germany, many escaped to USA and helped create the Atom Bomb and Sikh Empire had also given refuge to many of them in turn that they help create atom bombs for SIkhs. With the end of colonialism, european countries left Africa , along with the Sikh Empire, however, during that time , Sikhs had made converted all of east africa in to the Khalsa and thus and friendly relations with their former colonies. BY the end of 19th century, Sarkar E Khalsa was the 2nd largest economy after USA. 

 

21st Century

 

As for 2018, Sikh Empire is a nuclear superpower along with being one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Former British india is now split in 2 with Marathas and Rajputs controlling the subcontinent. Sarkar E Khalsa has friendly ties with both. 

 

The Flag of Sarkar E Khalsa has a Navy Blue background with a dark orange Khanda in the middle, and with 2 roaring Lions , one of each side of the khanda and a Eagle standing on the Khanda with it's wings spread out. 

gohan-maligno.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ZorawarSinghSaini said:

18th Century:

In this alternate history, I am starting after all the Sikh Misls had united under Maharaja Ranjit Singh. In this time line , Sikh Kings were not tolerant, any and all gaddars and enemies were killed without a thought. This Maharaja Ranjit Singh looked toward the future of the raj after his death and planned it so. The Maharaja did not invite anyone into the inner circle except strict Sikhs, aka Nihangs and those who had no alternate motivations except the far and wide rule of Sikh Fauj. In this scenario the king knew all about the dogra's trecherous nature, so he invaded and routed and slaughtered all dogras while annexing kashmir full into the sikh raj, rather than keeping it a vessle in the real time line. Further more, Sikhs were far more aggressive about converting all non sikhs into the khalsa fauj. People were given land and rewards when they converted and embraced khalsa. This way, Sikhs would've made up the majority of the empire  in a 100 yrs . Maharaja Ranjit Singh had started training his grandson Nau Nihal Singh to takeover his empire after his death in the future. So when the time came, Nihal would've been ready. In this time line , Sikh Empire is at it's peak and the maharaja is close to his death. But Nihal is fully ready to serve the Fauj. In this time line , the snakes never showed their heads since all faucets of the empire were made up of very sikh aspects. There was no terrible transition period between Rajit Singh's death and Nau Nihal's crowning. The british never saw a chance to strike , so they stayed at bay. 

 

Soon after taking over for his grandfather, Nau Nihal wanted to expand his rule, so he invaded Sindh and baluchistan , conquering both easily. The sikhs and british made further treaties into their allience and the british decided to hand  Haryana and Himachal to the Sikhs to show friendship. Meanwhile, the russians were looking to expand further down central asia and were looking to take Afganistan, the british decided to help sikhs Annex Afganistan , so russia never had a chance. Nau Nihal started his war against afgans, and with a rapidly industralizing Sikh Fauj and British weapons, the SIkhs easily defeated the very tribal and backwards afgans , this also led to the genocide of majority pathan population . Upwards of a million pathans were massacared by the Sikh army, though Sikhs didnt feel bad, as the afgans had slaughtered Sikhs in 17th century . Soon Sikhs had a huge landmass  for themselves, but they still weren't satisfied. The russians were coming, they wanted acess to the warm sea port into the indian ocean and didn't think the Sikhs couldn't defeat russian might. So the Sikh - Russo war started in 1893. Sikhs had been industrilizing since the start of 18th century and had much superior weapons and military system , that was developed with the help of the french and british. Sikhs easily defeated the russians and took over much of their central asian countries, uzbekistan, turkmenistan, parts of kazakstan were handed to the Sikhs and Europe took notice of this new superpower. 

 

19th Century

Sikhs expanded into africa, and made gains in Somalia and eritria . During WW1 , Sarkar I Khalsa sided with the brits  /allies but mostly stated out of the conflict, helping the allies with weapons / supplies and access through Sikh controlled areas.  However the Khalsa Fauj had it's own ambitions. Maharaja Ranjit the 2nd , son of Nau Nihal Singh wanted to take over tibet due to it's vast resources of mineral and plenty of fresh water. China itself was being destroyed by Japan and couldn't fight on two fronts and the Sikhs had a treaty with japan and so were able to annex Tibet. 

 

 WW2 , Sikhs again were friendly with brits / Allies and stayed mostly out of the war while protecting their african colonies . By 1940 , and the end of WW 2. Sikhs had grown to 100 million strong, made up majority in all the lands they controlled . Sikhism was now the 3rd largest religion after Christiany and islam, through the 19th and start of the 20th century , Sarkar - E - Khalsa stayed a monarchy, with the blood lines of the Original Maharaja Ranjit staying in power. Sikhs made out of WW2 with rich and with very few casulties, Sikhs never took part in battles in Europe and mainly just protected their assets. Sikhs had also loaned millions of dollars to the allies and very now the 3rd largest economy in the world by the end of WW2. With the end of Nazi empire , many nazi scientist were looking refuge outside germany, many escaped to USA and helped create the Atom Bomb and Sikh Empire had also given refuge to many of them in turn that they help create atom bombs for SIkhs. With the end of colonialism, european countries left Africa , along with the Sikh Empire, however, during that time , Sikhs had made converted all of east africa in to the Khalsa and thus and friendly relations with their former colonies. BY the end of 19th century, Sarkar E Khalsa was the 2nd largest economy after USA. 

 

21st Century

 

As for 2018, Sikh Empire is a nuclear superpower along with being one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Former British india is now split in 2 with Marathas and Rajputs controlling the subcontinent. Sarkar E Khalsa has friendly ties with both. 

 

The Flag of Sarkar E Khalsa has a Navy Blue background with a dark orange Khanda in the middle, and with 2 roaring Lions , one of each side of the khanda and a Eagle standing on the Khanda with it's wings spread out. 

gohan-maligno.jpg

Not sure how in line with Sikhi that history is. 

Still, Khalistan Zindabad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ZorawarSinghSaini said:

In this alternate history, I am starting after all the Sikh Misls had united under Maharaja Ranjit Singh. In this time line , Sikh Kings were not tolerant, any and all gaddars and enemies were killed without a thought.

Welcome to the forum, I hope you keep posting.

Very interesting thought experiment, and I do agree that we'd be sitting pretty if the Maharaja had not been so fantastically stupid.

It is agreed by all (including the British) that we only lost before the British by a hair. If we had won, we would have basically been a power like the British in India, except that we would have been indigenous, and therefore there couldn't have been the same kind of "Quit India, you don't belong here" movement against Sikh rule against us.

We could definitely have taken over great expanses of territory, and most importantly, a route to the sea. The foreign empires/Africa is a bit fanciful, but we definitely would have had an intact empire, flourishing numbers, a route to the sea, and industrialization. You have all that, and you basically have a great power, like France or so. Or Japan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Premi5 said:

Whatever was meant to happen, happened. It is what it is and nothing can change that 

Yea, Guru Sahib de Hukam vich hoaeaa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Posts

    • Sri Kesgarh Sahib (and Akaal Takht) has always allowed eating meat for those who take Amrit there, as long as it's not ritually killed like halaal.  They've followed the official Sikh Rehat Maryada since it was made in the 30s, before that they were Nihang Maryada who also allow meat. So no Panj Pyaare have ever mandated being veg at Anandpur Sahib. You can read the full Sikh Rehat Maryada in English, it includes the Panj Pyaare are meant to say on the day (page 57 I believe). My cousin took Amrit at Anandpur Sahib and my other one in Darbar Sahib 8 years later. I recently showed them both this page and they said that's exactly what the Panj said to them word for word at their Sanchaars
    • Anandpur Sahib does and always has followed the Sikh Rehat Maryada, same as Darbar Sahib in Amritsar. They allow you to eat any eggs, fish or meat as long it is not Halal meat/killed Ritualistically. They say Kes is the Kakkar, not Keski. I believe only AKJ says that and nobody else. You can read the full Sikh Rehat Maryada, page 56-7 I believe is what the Panj Pyaare are meant to say on the day. My cousin took Amrit at Anandpur Sahib and the other in Darbar Sahib 8 years later. I showed them both this page and they said that is exactly what the Panj said to them word for word at their Sanchaar
    • All Sikhs must recite Rehras Sahib daily but Chaupai Sahib and the short Anand Sahib were only added to it by SGPC and other jathebandis in the 1900s. In Guru Granth Sahib Ji's saroop, "Sodar Rehras" appears from "So dar tera keha" to "Saran pare ki rakho sarma", which is basically the first half of "Rehras" in all standard Gutka Sahibaan. So why do we recite these? Obviously doing more Baani can never be bad, but most Amritdharis recite Benti Chaupai and Anand Sahib in their morning Nitnem so why should we recite these two Baania again instead of a new one? That time could be used to read Shastar Naam Mala, Shabad Hazaare etc. And why do these two Baanis get more importance than the others? Surely if we recite Chaupai Sahib and (part of) Anand Sahib twice in a day then we should also recite Japji Sahib, Jaap Sahib and Tav Prasad Savaiya twice as well? Note: Pls correct me if I'm wrong about SGPC. My theory is that they added these into Rehras Sahib cos they removed them from the morning Baania but still had to include them in the daily Nitnem somehow, but this doesn't explain why older Samparde like Budha Dal also have this version of Rehras Sahib in their Gutkeh - someone enlighten Daas pls Bhul Chuk Maaf
    • There's no debate that all Sikhs must recite Rehras Sahib daily but Chaupai Sahib and the short Anand Sahib were only added to "Rehras Sahib" by SGPC and other jathebandis in the 1900s. In Guru Granth Sahib Ji's saroop, "Sodar Rehras" appears from "So dar tera keha" to "Saran pare ki rakho sarma", which is basically the first half of "Rehras" in all standard Gutka Sahibaan. So why do we recite these? I agree doing more Baani can never be bad, but most Amritdharis recite Benti Chaupai and Anand Sahib in their morning Nitnem so why should we recite these two Baania again instead of a new one? That time could be used to read Shastar Naam Mala, Shabad Hazaare etc. And why do these two Baanis get more importance than the others? Surely if we recite Chaupai Sahib and (part of) Anand Sahib twice in a day then we should also recite Japji Sahib, Jaap Sahib and Tav Prasad Savaiya twice as well? Note: Pls correct me if I'm wrong about SGPC. My theory is that they added these into Rehras Sahib as they removed them from the morning Baania but still had to include them in the daily Nitnem somehow, but this doesn't explain why older Samparde like Budha Dal also have this version of Rehras Sahib in their Gutkeh - someone enlighten Daas pls Bhul Chuk Maaf
    • Uncle, realistically are you gonna challenge it in real life? I could fully jhatka and eat a steak wearing Bana bilkul tere samne but on God you could do nothing about that 😂
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use