Jump to content

indian media is completely bikaauuu!


Recommended Posts

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
4 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

For most people in Sikh and Kashmiri circles this is no real revelation it is knowledge at grass roots since the eighties

contrary to what most sikhs believe on this site, Congress is not a hindutva party , rather blamed by hindutva followers to be a "muslim appeaser" party . The hindutva capture of media happened mostly after BJP came to center in 2014 , but then thats just because of the monies. Prominent media personalities changed their colors for the money from bjp, not because they suddenly became proud hindus 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

contrary to what most sikhs believe on this site, Congress is not a hindutva party , rather blamed by hindutva followers to be a "muslim appeaser" party . The hindutva capture of media happened mostly after BJP came to center in 2014 , but then thats just because of the monies. Prominent media personalities changed their colors for the money from bjp, not because they suddenly became proud hindus 

ALL POLITICAL PARTIES ARE BRAHMIN NESTS - it is Brahminvad which controls the country's resources, commerce, development, education, laws and justice

BJP -is full frontal assault , just round them up and kill/rape them

Congress - is death by a thousands cuts , removing future through destroying the culture, language and ethics of a group

do not be fooled both joined hands to attacked Harmandir Sahib FOUR times , Both are complicit  in suddhi kaaran, woodrose, and all the disappearences they just tag team the attacks .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
Just now, jkvlondon said:

ALL POLITICAL PARTIES ARE BRAHMIN NESTS - it is Brahminvad which controls the country's resources, commerce, development, education, laws and justice

BJP -is full frontal assault , just round them up and kill/rape them

Congress - is death by a thousands cuts , removing future through destroying the culture, language and ethics of a group

do not be fooled both joined hands to attacked Harmandir Sahib FOUR times , Both are complicit  in suddhi kaaran, woodrose, and all the disappearences they just tag team the attacks .

4 times ?? I only remember 1955 incident and 1984 incident BTW . And if i remember correctly , 1955 incident was police chastising the people leading the punjabi suba movement, no physical attack on infrastructure as such ! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

4 times ?? I only remember 1955 incident and 1984 incident BTW . And if i remember correctly , 1955 incident was police chastising the people leading the punjabi suba movement, no physical attack on infrastructure as such ! 

 

rajiv attacked twice in 86 and 88, in 1955 over 200 sikhs were killed and thousands arrested ...try reading true history not made up stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
30 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

rajiv attacked twice in 86 and 88, in 1955 over 200 sikhs were killed and thousands arrested ...try reading true history not made up stuff

Not doubting treacherous nehru,  but what concrete evidences do we have that nehru and gandhi promised bright future and autonomy to sikhs before partitition if they sided with india 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

Not doubting treacherous nehru,  but what concrete evidences do we have that nehru and gandhi promised bright future and autonomy to sikhs before partitition if they sided with india 

because there are minutes of meeting and numerous witness statements , newspaper quotes ... both in punjabi and other newspapers

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use