Jump to content

Sikh man brutally attacked in Karnataka for wearing kirpan


Recommended Posts

He was gonna get beat regardless, so in my opinion he should have tried defending himself with his kirpan instead. Would have hurt the mob as well then.

PS:Probably the kirpan he was wearing was probably a blunt novelty

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe he gave up his only means of defence so easily what did he think , that he could turn his back on a baying crowd and no one would hurt him ? It really beggars belief , even if the kirpan was blunt it was sufficient cause for pause for them .

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/28/2018 at 7:12 PM, Singh123456777 said:

He was gonna get beat regardless, so in my opinion he should have tried defending himself with his kirpan instead. Would have hurt the mob as well then.

PS:Probably the kirpan he was wearing was probably a blunt novelty

do you carry a 5ft sharp kirpan? have u ever used it? if no then why dont you? easy to cuss others.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Prokharkoo84 said:

do you carry a 5ft sharp kirpan? have u ever used it? if no then why dont you? easy to cuss others.

Did i say he needed a 5 foot sharp kirpan? I said that his kirpan was probably blunt novelty. Khalsa fauj should carey a shastar that is actually sharp and usable, such. As pech kabaz etc

if he carried a 5 foot sharp kirpan, he wouldnt be in this predicament. Unless he wanted to hand that to the mob as well

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Prokharkoo84 said:

do you carry a 5ft sharp kirpan? have u ever used it? if no then why dont you? easy to cuss others.

Come on, man, you must surely know that a full size kirpan is 3ft, not 5ft!

It doesn't matter if he's ever "used it". If you are walking around with a 3ft kirpan, you in all likelihood will never need to use it because nobody will bother you.

Finally, even a small kirpan has a huge deterrent effect, if actually used.

As the other posters have highlighted, he might as well have put up a fight when he had a weapon. It's kind of like what they say about kidnappings: you are advised to put up a fight right at the point where you're being kidnapped. If you are moved to another location, your chances of surviving go way down.

Similarly, while there's no guarantee, it should be quite obvious that the guy's chances of prevailing would be higher with a weapon.

Are you seriously going to argue that his chances of prevailing would have been higher without a weapon?

A guy with a sharp knife waving it around is not someone who will easily be approached by the average person. Nobody wants to be the "first guy" to receive knife wounds. You can quite easily wound, and even kill, with a knife.

I applaud the posters in this thread because they are encouraging Sikhs to man up.

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Singh123456777 said:

Did i say he needed a 5 foot sharp kirpan? I said that his kirpan was probably blunt novelty. Khalsa fauj should carey a shastar that is actually sharp and usable, such. As pech kabaz etc

if he carried a 5 foot sharp kirpan, he wouldnt be in this predicament. Unless he wanted to hand that to the mob as well

in that case is yours sharp? what faujiyah wala kaam have you done? my point being is brother we all quick to diss people like this, but we aint all exactly warriors ourselves lol. yeah i agree Singhs should be ready to fight whoever no matter the numbers, but sadly that isnt the case

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, BhForce said:

Come on, man, you must surely know that a full size kirpan is 3ft, not 5ft!

It doesn't matter if he's ever "used it". If you are walking around with a 3ft kirpan, you in all likelihood will never need to use it because nobody will bother you.

Finally, even a small kirpan has a huge deterrent effect, if actually used.

As the other posters have highlighted, he might as well have put up a fight when he had a weapon. It's kind of like what they say about kidnappings: you are advised to put up a fight right at the point where you're being kidnapped. If you are moved to another location, your chances of surviving go way down.

Similarly, while there's no guarantee, it should be quite obvious that the guy's chances of prevailing would be higher with a weapon.

Are you seriously going to argue that his chances of prevailing would have been higher without a weapon?

A guy with a sharp knife waving it around is not someone who will easily be approached by the average person. Nobody wants to be the "first guy" to receive knife wounds. You can quite easily wound, and even kill, with a knife.

I applaud the posters in this thread because they are encouraging Sikhs to man up.

and have you manned up now? do you now carry a 3ft, 5 ft or 7 ft siri sahib now? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Prokharkoo84 said:

in that case is yours sharp? what faujiyah wala kaam have you done? my point being is brother we all quick to diss people like this, but we aint all exactly warriors ourselves lol. yeah i agree Singhs should be ready to fight whoever no matter the numbers, but sadly that isnt the case

Yes i keep a sharp shastar on me at all times, and i train in yudh vidya such as boxing just in case i cannot use my shastar. I train in shastar vidya as wel but yudh vidya such as boxing is much more easier to utilize especially in the western world.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, monatosingh said:
5 hours ago, Prokharkoo84 said:

and have you manned up now? do you now carry a 3ft, 5 ft or 7 ft siri sahib now? 

There are 7ft Sri Sahibs?

No, bro, of course there aren't! He's just being hyperbolic.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Prokharkoo84 said:
On 5/30/2018 at 4:41 PM, BhForce said:

Come on, man, you must surely know that a full size kirpan is 3ft, not 5ft!

It doesn't matter if he's ever "used it". If you are walking around with a 3ft kirpan, you in all likelihood will never need to use it because nobody will bother you.

Finally, even a small kirpan has a huge deterrent effect, if actually used.

As the other posters have highlighted, he might as well have put up a fight when he had a weapon. It's kind of like what they say about kidnappings: you are advised to put up a fight right at the point where you're being kidnapped. If you are moved to another location, your chances of surviving go way down.

Similarly, while there's no guarantee, it should be quite obvious that the guy's chances of prevailing would be higher with a weapon.

Are you seriously going to argue that his chances of prevailing would have been higher without a weapon?

A guy with a sharp knife waving it around is not someone who will easily be approached by the average person. Nobody wants to be the "first guy" to receive knife wounds. You can quite easily wound, and even kill, with a knife.

I applaud the posters in this thread because they are encouraging Sikhs to man up.

and have you manned up now? do you now carry a 3ft, 5 ft or 7 ft siri sahib now? 

And thereby having refuted exactly zero of the arguments presented by me or the other posters.

In regards to encouraging Sikhs to "man up", that was used in the sentence "I applaud the posters in this thread because they are encouraging Sikhs to man up." And what they encouraged the guy to do was to not relinquish the kirpan on him (which was a small kirpan). 

All that the poster @Singh123456777 said is the guy should have used his kirpan (small). You're the one who if a Sikh dares to encourage a Sikh to use his kirpan, that you're going to demand of him whether he carries a 5ft kirpan.

Arguments you have not even bothered to refute:

-That most of the time, you'll never have to use a 3ft kirpan.

-You should not relinquish your weapon voluntarily.

-You have a better chance of prevailing with a weapon than without.

-Even small knives have a deterrent effect.

-No one wants to get a knife wound.

-You can kill with a knife.

 

I would really like to see your answers to these. Would they be like the following?

-If you carry a 3ft kirpan, Hindus/Muslims are more likely to accost you.

-If a thug demands you remove your kirpan, you should just hand it over.

-You have a better chance of prevailing without a weapon.

-Small knives have no deterrent effect.

-People actually want to get knife wounds.

-You can't kill with a knife. (That's why Sadiq Khan wants to ban knives, right? Because knives are harmless.)

 

I don't even know what or who you're angry with. Angry with Guru Gobind Singh ji? It's Guru Sahib's command not to be without a weapon, not a bunch of posters on sikhsangat.com

Link to post
Share on other sites

in Meghalaya sikhs are being targeted by mobs

http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/army-put-on-standby-in-violence-hit-shillong/599094.html

in UP, Gurdwara Sahib and sikh homes attacked

we need to wake up as a kaum and send help to these isolated sikhs  , interesting how social media and internet was shut down in areas of attack 'to prevent false news'

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Happens all the time even now! Collecting daswand to help 84 victims, to fight cases they raise a heck of money and boom they disappear and you never hear from them again  
    • Unfortunately outside India we've had plenty of 'daswand' collected to help 84 victims over the years in the West. Few years ago there was 'Sikh' organisation which collected well over 6 figs close to 200k to fight cases for those in jail and bring justice no idea where they went or what happen to the money.  Our kaum is infested with rats and deceivers sadly. 
    • Are they under the Indian government?   
    • Paedophile doctor, 28, who groomed '13-year-old girl' on Kik using the username 'olderc**k' walks free from court after his lawyer blamed his actions on working long hours during the pandemic James Peter Farthing, 28, spoke to the 'teenager' on messaging service Kik He asked to see pictures of her and sent the account a picture of his <banned word filter activated> But the NHS doctor was actually speaking to an undercover police officer He admitted attempting to groom a child and was given a suspended sentence  A doctor who attempted to groom a '13-year-old girl' online has been spared prison after his lawyers blamed his actions on working long hours during the Covid pandemic. James Peter Farthing, 28, spoke to the 'teenager' on messaging service Kik - under the username 'olderc**k' - as well as on Snapchat. The junior doctor, who worked for the NHS in Stockport, asked to see photographs of her body and shared an image of <banned word filter activated>. The account was actually being run by an undercover police officer and Farthing was later arrested for attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child. However, today he walked free from Minshull Street Crown Court after being handed a suspended sentence. Lawyers mitigating for Farthing, said he had been juggling working long hours during the pandemic, his wife's health condition and his training.  They said he had 'emotional struggles', had been watching pornography and smoking cannabis at the time - but that he was working to address his issues. Her Honour Judge Tina Landale sentenced him to six months in prison, suspended for two years, after he admitted attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child. He was handed concurrent sentences for attempting to involve a child aged 13 or over in non-penetrative sexual activity; and attempting to engage with a child aged 13 to 15 to watch and look at images of a sexual nature. The court heard Farthing spoke to the 'girl' on Kik - under the username 'olderc**k', Fiona Clancy, prosecuting said. He also spoke to her on Snapchat, in March. He said he was 23 and from Leeds. The 'girl' was called 'Beth' and was said to have been from Liverpool. The cop used a picture of kittens to portray how young she was, Ms Clancy said. Farthing asked 'Beth' if she was into 'older guys' and if she would send him a picture. 'Beth' told him: 'I'm 13, by the way.' Farthing replied: 'Cool. Are you down for role play or sex?' He asked to see her body and offered to show her his <banned word filter activated>. The 'girl' said she was worried about sending a photograph. Farthing reassured her that if she didn't include her face, it 'should be fine'. 'The fact that the undercover officer was 13 was reiterated, but the sexual conversations continued,' Ms Clancy said, as the conversations moved to Snapchat. Farthing told 'Beth': 'I have spoken to a few girls that like older men.' The officer then sent a picture of a young, clothed girl.  Farthing sent a photograph of his <banned word filter activated>. 'I really want to touch your body and see what you look like naked,' he said. He then sent another picture of his <banned word filter activated>. Ms Clancy said that when officers arrested Farthing, he said he was 'ashamed' and 'tried to stop', but 'gave in to sexual pleasure', the court heard. Simon Gurney, defending, said Farthing, who has no previous convictions, was 'deeply ashamed and remorseful for his behaviour'.   His supervisor - a consultant - and training programme director provided statements to the court. Staff and patients 'all expressed shock' after Farthing was arrested, the court heard, as people thought he had a good 'moral compass'.  Mr Gurney said they 'stand by him' because they acknowledge his remorse. The lawyer said it was the first time in Farthing's career that he didn't enjoy his work - and that his family was in debt as a result of the pandemic.  Mr Gurney said Farthing 'only has himself to blame for jeopardising' his career.  Judge Landale said the 'girl' made it 'clear that she didn't want to talk about sex'.  Farthing was ordered to take part in the Horizon project; to complete 20 rehabilitation activity requirement days; and to undertake 200 hours of unpaid work. He was also made the subject of a sexual harm prevention order - to last a decade.   https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9995087/NHS-junior-doctor-28-groomed-13-year-old-girl-Kik-spared-prison.html  
    • Plus who said I was some 'admitted expert' about the dumbing down? There's no two ways about it, everything is dumbed down for pendus. Who can't see that? The only people who can't see it, are the dumb themselves. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use