Jump to content

Christianity and Islam


Dsinghd
 Share

Recommended Posts

Both of these faiths are mirror image. None of them can be trusted. In the past they have even used each other to spread (e.g Indonesia).

There is chapter in the Quran called Isa (Jesus) and hailed as a prophet of Allah.

Christians call all non-Christian as heathens (infidels).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Dsinghdp said:

Both of these faiths are mirror image. None of them can be trusted. In the past they have even used each other to spread (e.g Indonesia).

There is chapter in the Quran called Isa (Jesus) and hailed as a prophet of Allah.

Christians call all non-Christian as heathens (infidels).

It should be obvious from my post history that I have no love lost for the British who destroyed our Sikh Raaj.

But, in the present day, if you were given the choice to live in a random Christian country vs. a random Muslim country, which would you choose?

Don't lie, please.

Oh, also, 99% chance you're posting this from a non-Muslim country, likely Christian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Islam was spread with violence, fear and murder, Now that it has geographically stopped spreading and reached its limit now they have turned on each other and are killing one another. Something that begins and spreads with violence eventually reaches a limit and then turns on itself and becomes self destructive. Since the recent Saudi and Iran proxy war started in Yemen, around 10,000 Muslims in Yemen have died. Sunnis and Shias are killing each other in the middle east everyday. More muslims have been killed by the taliban and ISIS than non Muslims, in fact muslims have suffered much more under these terrorist groups than non muslims. 

 

Well the reason that Muslims say that Islam came was because the previous religions Judaism and Christianity had become corrupt. So Muslims do not deny any of the prophets and see jesus as one too. Difference is Muslims dont believe  that Jesus was god or the son of god and that he didn't die on the cross 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, puzzled said:

Islam was spread with violence, fear and murder, Now that it has geographically stopped spreading and reached its limit now they have turned on each other and are killing one another. Something that begins and spreads with violence eventually reaches a limit and then turns on itself and becomes self destructive. Since the recent Saudi and Iran proxy war started in Yemen, around 10,000 Muslims in Yemen have died. Sunnis and Shias are killing each other in the middle east everyday. More muslims have been killed by the taliban and ISIS than non Muslims, in fact muslims have suffered much more under these terrorist groups than non muslims. 

 

Well the reason that Muslims say that Islam came was because the previous religions Judaism and Christianity had become corrupt. So Muslims do not deny any of the prophets and see jesus as one too. Difference is Muslims dont believe  that Jesus was god or the son of god and that he didn't die on the cross 

same with early christianity and that which foillowed the pioneering explorers to the new world .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, puzzled said:

Islam was spread with violence, fear and murder, Now that it has geographically stopped spreading and reached its limit now they have turned on each other and are killing one another. 

Now? They've fought each other ever since the death of Mohammed. The issue of who becomes the caliph of Muslims is the essence of the Sunni-Shia divide. That didn't happen 50 years ago; they've been at it since 632AD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

same with early christianity and that which foillowed the pioneering explorers to the new world .

Yeah! Even though Christians are peaceful today Christianity has a very dark and bloody past. The inquisitions, witch hunts, puritans etc Even the long history of the popes is full of murder, genocide, rape, adultery, incest, pedophilia etc   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Now? They've fought each other ever since the death of Mohammed. The issue of who becomes the caliph of Muslims is the essence of the Sunni-Shia divide. That didn't happen 50 years ago; they've been at it since 632AD.

Yeah but what i meant is that when Islam was spreading all the way from Arabia to India and beyond it was basically slaughtering non muslims but now that it has geographically stopped spreading they have no one else to kill other than each other and thats what they are basically doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But at least Christians have changed, Muslims can learn from them ...  

Even Hindus have changed, not long ago they were burning widows and pouring boiling water/oil into the ears of shudras who accidentally heard the vedas. The way Hinduism was practiced especially by the brahmins was pure evil and not too long ago either 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use