Jump to content

Hazur Sahib Sri Dasam Granth Senchyia missing first Savaiya


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, chatanga1 said:

 

 

So typical to jump the gun and start casting aspertions.

after a discrepancy was discovered in a sikh ithiaas book printed to order by SGPC by a vigilant gursikh it took more than 4 years for SGPC to respond in the meantime those books had long gone into individual hands and created dubida in sikhs and searchers ...surely beadbhi of Gurbani is higher priority so action has to be quick and decisive to avoid people reading and learning mistakes . If it is called thethi Swaiyae  it would be normal to expect 33 not 32 or 34 swaiyae and it to be the correct ones . Sorry if I trod on someone's sentiments in worry for my sikh bretheren being misguided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

after a discrepancy was discovered in a sikh ithiaas book printed to order by SGPC by a vigilant gursikh it took more than 4 years for SGPC to respond in the meantime those books had long gone into individual hands and created dubida in sikhs and searchers ...surely beadbhi of Gurbani is higher priority so action has to be quick and decisive to avoid people reading and learning mistakes . If it is called thethi Swaiyae  it would be normal to expect 33 not 32 or 34 swaiyae and it to be the correct ones . Sorry if I trod on someone's sentiments in worry for my sikh bretheren being misguided.

In reality the standard “33 swayie” was implimented by sgpc. Its actually supposed to be 34 swayie, but cause it was only found in some saroops at hazur sahib the sgpc used their dumb brains and discredited it(such as other banis like uggardanti etc). 

Time for a history lesson, cause yall really need it. 32 swayie were written before khalsa was created. The 33rd swayie was created after the khalsa was created, and the 34th swayie was created when maharaj went to nanded di dharti. 

Before jumping to conclusions we should know our ithaas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Singh123456777 said:

In reality the standard “33 swayie” was implimented by sgpc. Its actually supposed to be 34 swayie, but cause it was only found in some saroops at hazur sahib the sgpc used their dumb brains and discredited it(such as other banis like uggardanti etc). 

Time for a history lesson, cause yall really need it. 32 swayie were written before khalsa was created. The 33rd swayie was created after the khalsa was created, and the 34th swayie was created when maharaj went to nanded di dharti. 

Before jumping to conclusions we should know our ithaas

but veer ji given that it is obviously computer printset , would it not be quick enough to double check prior to print run? it seems so simple to do that (I've had to write massive instruction manuals  and usually you check there hasn't been an unauthorised  version change prior to printing, document handler automatically stores seperate version each save) compared against Dasam Granth I can see the missing stanza/swayiae. What does the actual manglacharan look like in purataan Dasam Granth because the version I have access to looks like this :

ਸਵਯੇ ॥

Savaye ॥

THIRTY-THREE SWAYYAS

 

ਅਛਰ ਆਦਿ ਅਨੀਲ ਅਨਾਹਦ ਸਤ ਸਦੈਵ ਤੁਹੀ ਕਰਤਾਰਾ ॥

Achhar Aadi Aneela Anaahada Sata Sadaiva Tuhee Kartaaraa ॥

O Lord ! Thou art Indestructible, Beginningless, limitless and ever Truth-incarnate and Creator

 

ੴ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫਤਹਿ ॥

Ikoankaar Vaahiguroo Jee Kee Phatahi ॥

The Lord is One and the Victory is of the Lord.

 

ਜੀਵ ਜਿਤੇ ਜਲ ਮੈ ਥਲ ਮੈ ਸਬ ਕੈ ਸਦ ਪੇਟ ਕੌ ਪੋਖਨ ਹਾਰਾ ॥

Jeeva Jite Jala Mai Thala Mai Saba Kai Sada Petta Kou Pokhn Haaraa ॥

Thou art the sustainer of all the beings living in water and on plain

 

ਸ੍ਰੀ ਮੁਖਵਾਕ ਪਾਤਸਾਹੀ ੧੦ ॥

Sree Mukhvaak Paatasaahee 10 ॥

The utterance from the holy mouth of the Tenth King :

 

ਬੇਦ ਪੁਰਾਨ ਕੁਰਾਨ ਦੁਹੂੰ ਮਿਲਿ ਭਾਂਤਿ ਅਨੇਕ ਬਿਚਾਰ ਬਿਚਾਰਾ ॥

Beda Puraan Kuraan Duhooaan Mili Bhaanti Aneka Bichaara Bichaaraa ॥

The Vedas, Quran, Puranas together have mentioned many thoughts about you

 

then Jagat Jot swaiyae

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

but veer ji given that it is obviously computer printset , would it not be quick enough to double check prior to print run? it seems so simple to do that (I've had to write massive instruction manuals  and usually you check there hasn't been an unauthorised  version change prior to printing, document handler automatically stores seperate version each save) compared against Dasam Granth I can see the missing stanza/swayiae. What does the actual manglacharan look like in purataan Dasam Granth because the version I have access to looks like this :

ਸਵਯੇ ॥

Savaye ॥

THIRTY-THREE SWAYYAS

 

ਅਛਰ ਆਦਿ ਅਨੀਲ ਅਨਾਹਦ ਸਤ ਸਦੈਵ ਤੁਹੀ ਕਰਤਾਰਾ ॥

Achhar Aadi Aneela Anaahada Sata Sadaiva Tuhee Kartaaraa ॥

O Lord ! Thou art Indestructible, Beginningless, limitless and ever Truth-incarnate and Creator

 

ੴ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫਤਹਿ ॥

Ikoankaar Vaahiguroo Jee Kee Phatahi ॥

The Lord is One and the Victory is of the Lord.

 

ਜੀਵ ਜਿਤੇ ਜਲ ਮੈ ਥਲ ਮੈ ਸਬ ਕੈ ਸਦ ਪੇਟ ਕੌ ਪੋਖਨ ਹਾਰਾ ॥

Jeeva Jite Jala Mai Thala Mai Saba Kai Sada Petta Kou Pokhn Haaraa ॥

Thou art the sustainer of all the beings living in water and on plain

 

ਸ੍ਰੀ ਮੁਖਵਾਕ ਪਾਤਸਾਹੀ ੧੦ ॥

Sree Mukhvaak Paatasaahee 10 ॥

The utterance from the holy mouth of the Tenth King :

 

ਬੇਦ ਪੁਰਾਨ ਕੁਰਾਨ ਦੁਹੂੰ ਮਿਲਿ ਭਾਂਤਿ ਅਨੇਕ ਬਿਚਾਰ ਬਿਚਾਰਾ ॥

Beda Puraan Kuraan Duhooaan Mili Bhaanti Aneka Bichaara Bichaaraa ॥

The Vedas, Quran, Puranas together have mentioned many thoughts about you

 

then Jagat Jot swaiyae

 

 

See, the thing is. You are looking at one manuscript of dasam granth. There are many others with different mangals etc, hence why Hazur sahib version is different than sgpc or Mehron Budha Dal version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Singh123456777 said:

See, the thing is. You are looking at one manuscript of dasam granth. There are many others with different mangals etc, hence why Hazur sahib version is different than sgpc or Mehron Budha Dal version.

given the fluidity of the situation which is considered the most authentic  i.e. closest to Guru ji's final ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry if I'm being rude here, but can we stop using SGPC as a scapegoat.

I mentioned this before, SGPC doesn't print Sri Dasam Granth whole or as Bhaag/Senchyia. The nearest thing they print is their Das Granthi Gutka Sahib which contains: Jaap, Shabad Hazare, Akal Ustat, Bachittar Natak, Chandi Charittar Ukat Bilas, Chandi Charittar, Chandi Di Vaar, and Gian Prabodh.

All I can say its that I would never trust Chattar Singh Jeevan Singh. I personally consider SGPC as most authentic for SGGS Ji.

SGPC didn't even exist when the Sodhak Committee was working on Sri Dasam Granth, how could they have done anything? I don't think they removed the 34th Savaiya, because if I read correctly, Giani Sher Singh said this last Savaiya was written at Hazur Sahib? So it wasn't part of the original then I'm assuming.

I would like to have a copy of Mehron Wale Senchyia and compare them to Hazur Sahib ones. Next time I go to India will try to get them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

given the fluidity of the situation which is considered the most authentic  i.e. closest to Guru ji's final ?

In my opinion the one with the 34th pauri should be considered most authentic. 

 

I currently read Mehron Budha Dal saroop/pothis so i follow what is written in it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use