Jump to content
FreshMind13

Hazur Sahib Sri Dasam Granth Senchyia missing first Savaiya

Recommended Posts

As said in the title, Hazur Sahib Senchi is missing the first Savaiya from 33 Savaiye? Why? This is big beadbi.

V40zCcXf991rdsRjhttHjwPBeIC640Qm-0SHXCWi

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, FreshMind13 said:

As said in the title, Hazur Sahib Senchi is missing the first Savaiya from 33 Savaiye? Why? This is big beadbi.

V40zCcXf991rdsRjhttHjwPBeIC640Qm-0SHXCWi

let me guess is it printed by SGPC ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

let me guess is it printed by SGPC ?

Nope, I said in the title, Hazur Sahib.

SGPC doesn't print Sri Dasam Granth or Senchyia of it. Closest thing SGPC has is their Das Granthi Gutka I guess.

Edited by FreshMind13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, FreshMind13 said:

Nope, I said in the title, Hazur Sahib.

SGPC doesn't print Sri Dasam Granth or Senchyia of it. Closest thing SGPC has is their Das Granthi Gutka I guess.

who are responsible for printing presses there , I had heard RSS had infiltrated the committee there (maybe just a rumour but given this situation maybe not so false) basically whereever they have had an access they have distorted and reprinted to suit ...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

who are responsible for printing presses there , I had heard RSS had infiltrated the committee there (maybe just a rumour but given this situation maybe not so false) basically whereever they have had an access they have distorted and reprinted to suit ...

I have no clue, I borrowed this from a local Singh.

What is also interesting is that the second savaiya ends in a ||1||, not a ||2||. So this is not a simple printing mistake, but someone purposefully did not include it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, FreshMind13 said:

I have no clue, I borrowed this from a local Singh.

What is also interesting is that the second savaiya ends in a ||1||, not a ||2||. So this is not a simple printing mistake, but someone purposefully did not include it.

obviously they must have quality assurance as it is Gurbani and the manglacharan page is starting with the second swaiyae so yes it is a deliberate choice by the print setter. Time to get everyone to check their copies and create a stink if more are found .

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think @TaksalDaSingh9771 also has Hazur Sahib senchis, maybe he can also check

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

There is also another saroop that has 34 swayie and that too is in hazur sahib. Listen to giani sher singhs 33 swayie katha for more information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/18/2018 at 9:53 AM, jkvlondon said:

let me guess is it printed by SGPC ?

 

On 7/18/2018 at 10:32 AM, jkvlondon said:

Time to get everyone to check their copies and create a stink if more are found .

 

So typical to jump the gun and start casting aspertions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, chatanga1 said:

 

 

So typical to jump the gun and start casting aspertions.

after a discrepancy was discovered in a sikh ithiaas book printed to order by SGPC by a vigilant gursikh it took more than 4 years for SGPC to respond in the meantime those books had long gone into individual hands and created dubida in sikhs and searchers ...surely beadbhi of Gurbani is higher priority so action has to be quick and decisive to avoid people reading and learning mistakes . If it is called thethi Swaiyae  it would be normal to expect 33 not 32 or 34 swaiyae and it to be the correct ones . Sorry if I trod on someone's sentiments in worry for my sikh bretheren being misguided.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

Sorry if I trod on someone's sentiments in worry for my sikh bretheren being misguided.

It wasn't your worries. Its just a trait of yours. To run off at the mouth without any research into it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
2 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

after a discrepancy was discovered in a sikh ithiaas book printed to order by SGPC by a vigilant gursikh it took more than 4 years for SGPC to respond in the meantime those books had long gone into individual hands and created dubida in sikhs and searchers ...surely beadbhi of Gurbani is higher priority so action has to be quick and decisive to avoid people reading and learning mistakes . If it is called thethi Swaiyae  it would be normal to expect 33 not 32 or 34 swaiyae and it to be the correct ones . Sorry if I trod on someone's sentiments in worry for my sikh bretheren being misguided.

In reality the standard “33 swayie” was implimented by sgpc. Its actually supposed to be 34 swayie, but cause it was only found in some saroops at hazur sahib the sgpc used their dumb brains and discredited it(such as other banis like uggardanti etc). 

Time for a history lesson, cause yall really need it. 32 swayie were written before khalsa was created. The 33rd swayie was created after the khalsa was created, and the 34th swayie was created when maharaj went to nanded di dharti. 

Before jumping to conclusions we should know our ithaas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Singh123456777 said:

In reality the standard “33 swayie” was implimented by sgpc. Its actually supposed to be 34 swayie, but cause it was only found in some saroops at hazur sahib the sgpc used their dumb brains and discredited it(such as other banis like uggardanti etc). 

Time for a history lesson, cause yall really need it. 32 swayie were written before khalsa was created. The 33rd swayie was created after the khalsa was created, and the 34th swayie was created when maharaj went to nanded di dharti. 

Before jumping to conclusions we should know our ithaas

but veer ji given that it is obviously computer printset , would it not be quick enough to double check prior to print run? it seems so simple to do that (I've had to write massive instruction manuals  and usually you check there hasn't been an unauthorised  version change prior to printing, document handler automatically stores seperate version each save) compared against Dasam Granth I can see the missing stanza/swayiae. What does the actual manglacharan look like in purataan Dasam Granth because the version I have access to looks like this :

ਸਵਯੇ ॥

Savaye ॥

THIRTY-THREE SWAYYAS

 

ਅਛਰ ਆਦਿ ਅਨੀਲ ਅਨਾਹਦ ਸਤ ਸਦੈਵ ਤੁਹੀ ਕਰਤਾਰਾ ॥

Achhar Aadi Aneela Anaahada Sata Sadaiva Tuhee Kartaaraa ॥

O Lord ! Thou art Indestructible, Beginningless, limitless and ever Truth-incarnate and Creator

 

ੴ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫਤਹਿ ॥

Ikoankaar Vaahiguroo Jee Kee Phatahi ॥

The Lord is One and the Victory is of the Lord.

 

ਜੀਵ ਜਿਤੇ ਜਲ ਮੈ ਥਲ ਮੈ ਸਬ ਕੈ ਸਦ ਪੇਟ ਕੌ ਪੋਖਨ ਹਾਰਾ ॥

Jeeva Jite Jala Mai Thala Mai Saba Kai Sada Petta Kou Pokhn Haaraa ॥

Thou art the sustainer of all the beings living in water and on plain

 

ਸ੍ਰੀ ਮੁਖਵਾਕ ਪਾਤਸਾਹੀ ੧੦ ॥

Sree Mukhvaak Paatasaahee 10 ॥

The utterance from the holy mouth of the Tenth King :

 

ਬੇਦ ਪੁਰਾਨ ਕੁਰਾਨ ਦੁਹੂੰ ਮਿਲਿ ਭਾਂਤਿ ਅਨੇਕ ਬਿਚਾਰ ਬਿਚਾਰਾ ॥

Beda Puraan Kuraan Duhooaan Mili Bhaanti Aneka Bichaara Bichaaraa ॥

The Vedas, Quran, Puranas together have mentioned many thoughts about you

 

then Jagat Jot swaiyae

 

 

Edited by jkvlondon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to give you an example of Iceland where everyone has to scrub themself before using their hot springs. The reason Icelanders are so adamant is, in fact, purely hygienic.
    • Guest harleen
      the first time I took Amrit, I was 5 years old. After plenty of mistakes and growing I had taken it again at the age of 12 from pressure (not all of it was bad but some auntiyan were really urging me to just do it even though my family was warning me of all my responsibilities) and just pure desire to want it. It was at a camp and they really motivate you well. I kept it up for a while and ended up doing many wrongful things afterwards. I’ve plucked my eyebrows because I started getting insecure and ashamed, and just some of my facial hair in general after I got judgemental comments even from my own mother who is Amritdhari, I’ve removed a small amount from legs a couple times where my leg was exposed, once even because I childishly wanted to see what a razor feels like (not sure if this was before or after I took it again). But I’ve had my fair share of mess ups. I kissed a boy and once he took Amrit we never did again and are on a better path now where we don’t even see each other in real life. I feel like I have to confess to that and I’m not sure how. The worst one for me is confession removing pubic hair a few times for comfort purposes especially during period a few times. I just can’t find any way to do that so simply. I know I have to confess everything I can remember because if I don’t then I will be punished after I leave this world so I might as confess now and take the tankha especially because I do very much feel guilty for it all. I don’t know what I was thinking. But I’m terrified of how to say all this. Like wording-wise and just bringing it up in general. 
    • Guest guest
      you sound hysterical.   again, why do you keep mixing brown with blacks? - if small pox was stolen, why did they record where they originally got it from?  i don't think you understand the concept of theft.  immunisation is not the same as variolation.  its an improvement upon it.  would you rather receive variolation or immunisation. -picasso did not "steal" his art.  its well known he was influenced by the african masks he saw at the paris world show. so if an african plays guitar, does that mean he 'stole' the instrument from the west?  stop being stupid. i think you should look up the world 'steal'.
    • Guest guest
      the concept of zero is an intellectual idea.  why should they pay for it?  do you seem modern mathematicians 'patenting' their work? they got via the arabs anyway.
    • Guest guest
      they left india over 73 years ago!   thats not an excuse for todays poverty.   what have punjabis done?  just laced panjab soil and water with toxins to make money, imported foreign livestock and run off to europe/north america en masse? yes theres ALOT of bad stuff.  but what about good stuff?  you can research infant mortality before and after to get an idea.  or deaths from diseases like malaria etc  or number of women forced into sati against their will.   who exactly should feel remorse or shame?  how many of these people were actually there at that time?  why should they feel remorse or shame for what their grandparents did? "take em for wat u can get. they deserve no sympathy." ^this sounds like the kind of cruelty you accuse them of.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use