Jump to content

Hazur Sahib Sri Dasam Granth Senchyia missing first Savaiya


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Dsinghdp said:

The SGPC left out

Uggardanti

Hanuman Natak

Sukhmana

to keep it short than Guru Granth Sahib.

He real reason the sodhak committee took these banis out was because they had a lot of hindu iconography which didnt go well with their missionary brains. 

Other banis that were left out are Brahm Kavach(which also says to do havan), bhagaouti astotar, asfokat swayie etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Singh123456777 said:

He real reason the sodhak committee took these banis out was because they had a lot of hindu iconography which didnt go well with their missionary brains. 

Other banis that were left out are Brahm Kavach(which also says to do havan), bhagaouti astotar, asfokat swayie etc

but Havan for a khalsa is doing naam simran from what I was told .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

but Havan for a khalsa is doing naam simran from what I was told .

???

there are places in puratan granths where it tells of sikhs (such as baba deep singh)doing havan etc

Ill post up the brahm kavach bani where it talks about havan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Singh123456777 said:

He real reason the sodhak committee took these banis out was because they had a lot of hindu iconography which didnt go well with their missionary brains. 

Other banis that were left out are Brahm Kavach(which also says to do havan), bhagaouti astotar, asfokat swayie etc

Sodhak Committee wasn't Missionary btw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Singh123456777 said:

???

there are places in puratan granths where it tells of sikhs (such as baba deep singh)doing havan etc

Ill post up the brahm kavach bani where it talks about havan

after Naina Devi Havan didn't Guru Pita ji say that he wanted to break sikhs from old bharam of Havan and Hom karna thus he agreed to Pandit's proposal ? Or is this a change on the sakhi?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jkvlondon said:

after Naina Devi Havan didn't Guru Pita ji say that he wanted to break sikhs from old bharam of Havan and Hom karna thus he agreed to Pandit's proposal ? Or is this a change on the sakhi?

Grow up and stop believing in fairytales told by RSS motivated story tellers. There is no change of the sakhi. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use