Jump to content

EDL supporting Sikhs


Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 8/11/2018 at 8:16 PM, Guest Genda said:

The same thing is happening in the US as well. The media keeps trying to silence Trump but it's not working anymore. Gone are the days where the media can dictate public opinion.

^^honestly, if u think there's a problem, then why don't you speak up about it rather than hiding behind a fascist party?

As long as what u would say wouldn't be racist and fascist itself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/12/2018 at 12:09 PM, Guest Sat said:

^^honestly, if u think there's a problem, then why don't you speak up about it rather than hiding behind a fascist party?

As long as what u would say wouldn't be racist and fascist itself. 

Do you even know what the word fascists means? .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/12/2018 at 8:09 PM, Guest Sat said:

^^honestly, if u think there's a problem, then why don't you speak up about it rather than hiding behind a fascist party?

As long as what u would say wouldn't be racist and fascist itself. 

The unfortunate thing is  if facism is coming to the U.S. it won't come wrapped in a flag but will be wearing a p*ssy hat flag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest London jwaan
On 8/8/2018 at 7:24 PM, Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh said:

None of them have ever or would even think about standing in unity alongside the facists for the question of whether or not to do so is basically a matter of right and wrong. The trend as manifested on this thread among UK Sikhs to 'try a bit of facism' is as scary as it is sad. No Pasaran always.

You really are a c0ck. Im astounded that each one of your idiotic comments is even more moronic than the last.

So let's recap : what you're saying is that no sikh person who saw violence in the 1970s with the nf in southall would think about agreeing with the edl, so would automatically side with Muslims, who incidentally raped sikh women, performed forced conversions and killed Sikhs during the atrocious communal violence in partition of punjab and now are the  single highest perpetrators of child grooming in this country (including of sikh girls) regardless of your idiotic copy and pastes. Indeed sajid javid has even acknowledged that and ordered an inquiry as to why the majority of child groomers are overwhelmingly from Pakistani origins. But you continue to fantasise and spout diahorrea in your usual manner......

And to your point about the fact that sadiq got in because 2m Muslims voted for him. That's the reason Muslims are becoming more prominent. Because they see any Muslim as one of their own and back him /her to get ahead as a community. With apnay, the minute someone is getting somewhere its c6cks like you that are "anti" then because he has too much affix in his dhari or because his suit was too fashionable. Much like your criticism of the apna head of the liberal party for marrying a girl who trimmed her hair.

The most useful thing I think you can possibly do, is try and shove your keyboard up your jagsaw, and please post here to let us know if you managed to get it all in. That would be more useful for the sangat to know than any of your typical bukwaas.

Oh and your nonsense about edl being funded by Canadian fascists....Errr they're not.

Waheguru JI ka Khalsa, Waheguru JI ki fateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh
8 hours ago, Guest London jwaan said:

You really are a c0ck. Im astounded that each one of your idiotic comments is even more moronic than the last.

So let's recap : what you're saying is that no sikh person who saw violence in the 1970s with the nf in southall would think about agreeing with the edl, so would automatically side with Muslims, who incidentally raped sikh women, performed forced conversions and killed Sikhs during the atrocious communal violence in partition of punjab and now are the  single highest perpetrators of child grooming in this country (including of sikh girls) regardless of your idiotic copy and pastes. Indeed sajid javid has even acknowledged that and ordered an inquiry as to why the majority of child groomers are overwhelmingly from Pakistani origins. But you continue to fantasise and spout diahorrea in your usual manner......

And to your point about the fact that sadiq got in because 2m Muslims voted for him. That's the reason Muslims are becoming more prominent. Because they see any Muslim as one of their own and back him /her to get ahead as a community. With apnay, the minute someone is getting somewhere its c6cks like you that are "anti" then because he has too much affix in his dhari or because his suit was too fashionable. Much like your criticism of the apna head of the liberal party for marrying a girl who trimmed her hair.

The most useful thing I think you can possibly do, is try and shove your keyboard up your jagsaw, and please post here to let us know if you managed to get it all in. That would be more useful for the sangat to know than any of your typical bukwaas.

Oh and your nonsense about edl being funded by Canadian fascists....Errr they're not.

Waheguru JI ka Khalsa, Waheguru JI ki fateh

Thank you my friend for sharing your thoughts.  As a tree=hugging bearded lefty I do of course heartedly welcome all opinions with much love. Please do post more often. There is so much love, respect and awe-inspiring niceness in everything you write it definitely makes the world a much nicer place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use